Literature DB >> 26601647

Surgical resident involvement differentially affects patient outcomes in laparoscopic and open colectomy for malignancy.

Megan Sippey1, Konstantinos Spaniolas1, Mark L Manwaring1, Walter E Pofahl1, Kevin R Kasten2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated effect of resident involvement on outcomes after laparoscopic and open colon resection for malignancy.
METHODS: Patients undergoing colectomy were queried using the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. "Attending alone" and "Resident" cohorts were compared with primary end point of overall morbidity.
RESULTS: Of 37,330 patients, residents were involved in 26,190 (70.2%) cases. Attending alone patients were older with higher vascular, cardiac, and pulmonary comorbidity. Univariate analysis demonstrated increased operative time (181.0 ± 98.4 vs 138.7 ± 77.0, P < .001), reoperation (5.7% vs 5.2%, P = .041), and readmission rates (11.9% vs 9.6%, P = .037) with resident involvement. Serious (16.0% vs 13.9%, P < .001), minor (17.5% vs 14.1%, P < .001), and overall morbidity (26.4% vs 22.5%, P < .001) were higher with resident participation. Mortality (2.0% vs 2.8%, P < .001) and failure to rescue (.8% vs 1.2%, P < .029) were lower with resident involvement. Resident involvement showed independent association with overall morbidity in both laparoscopic (odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.38, P < .001) and open cases (odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval, 1.18 to 1.35, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Resident participation in colectomy for malignancy is associated with lower mortality at the expense of higher overall morbidity.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Colectomy; Morbidity; NSQIP; Oncology; Outcome; Resident; SSI

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26601647     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

Review 1.  What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Andrea Balla; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Martinez; Pilar Hernández; Jesús Bollo; Eduard M Targarona
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The Presence of an Advanced Gastrointestinal (GI)/Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Fellowship Program Does Not Impact Short-Term Patient Outcomes Following Fundoplication or Esophagomyotomy.

Authors:  Donald K Groves; Maria S Altieri; Brianne Sullivan; Jie Yang; Mark A Talamini; Aurora D Pryor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Trainee-associated outcomes in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: propensity score analysis accounting for operative time, procedure complexity and patient comorbidity.

Authors:  Kevin R Kasten; Adam C Celio; Lauren Trakimas; Mark L Manwaring; Konstantinos Spaniolas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Impact of fellow compared to resident assistance on outcomes of minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Sherif Aly; Susanna W L de Geus; Cullen O Carter; Teviah E Sachs; Donald T Hess; Jennifer F Tseng; Luise I M Pernar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Trainee performance in radical gastrectomy and its effect on outcomes.

Authors:  M Navidi; A Madhavan; S M Griffin; P Prasad; A Immanuel; N Hayes; A W Phillips
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-11-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.