Literature DB >> 26601577

Divergent utilization patterns of grass fructan, inulin, and other nonfiber carbohydrates by ruminal microbes.

M B Hall1, P J Weimer2.   

Abstract

Fructans are an important nonfiber carbohydrate in cool season grasses. Their fermentation by ruminal microbes is not well described, though such information is needed to understand their nutritional value to ruminants. Our objective was to compare kinetics and product formation of orchardgrass fructan (phlein; PHL) to other nonfiber carbohydrates when fermented in vitro with mixed or pure culture ruminal microbes. Studies were carried out as randomized complete block designs. All rates given are first-order rate constants. With mixed ruminal microbes, rate of substrate disappearance tended to be greater for glucose (GLC) than for PHL and chicory fructan (inulin; INU), which tended to differ from each other (0.74, 0.62, and 0.33 h(-1), respectively). Disappearance of GLC had almost no lag time (0.04 h), whereas the fructans had lags of 1.4h. The maximum microbial N accumulation, a proxy for cell growth, tended to be 20% greater for PHL and INU than for GLC. The N accumulation rate for GLC (1.31h(-1)) was greater than for PHL (0.75 h(-1)) and INU (0.26 h(-1)), which also differed. More microbial glycogen (+57%) was accumulated from GLC than from PHL, though accumulation rates did not differ (1.95 and 1.44 h(-1), respectively); little glycogen accumulated from INU. Rates of organic acid formation were 0.80, 0.28, and 0.80 h(-1) for GLC, INU, and PHL, respectively, with PHL tending to be greater than INU. Lactic acid production was more than 7-fold greater for GLC than for the fructans. The ratio of microbial cell carbon to organic acid carbon tended to be greater for PHL (0.90) and INU (0.86) than for GLC (0.69), indicating a greater yield of cell mass per amount of substrate fermented with fructans. Reduced microbial yield for GLC may relate to the greater glycogen production that requires ATP, and lactate production that yields less ATP; together, these processes could have reduced ATP available for cell growth. Acetate molar proportion was less for GLC than for fructans, and less for PHL than for INU. In studies with pure cultures, all microbes evaluated showed differences in specific growth rate constants (μ) for GLC, fructose, sucrose, maltose, and PHL. Selenomonas ruminantium and Streptococcus bovis showed the highest μ for PHL (0.55 and 0.67 h(-1), respectively), which were 50 to 60% of the μ achieved for GLC. The 10 other species tested had μ between 0.01 and 0.11h(-1) with PHL. Ruminal microbes use PHL differently than they do GLC or INU.
Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fermentation; fructan; nonfiber carbohydrate; rumen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26601577     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  4 in total

Review 1.  A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types-The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions.

Authors:  Xuezhao Sun; Long Cheng; Arjan Jonker; Sineka Munidasa; David Pacheco
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-17

2.  Key Microbiota Identification Using Functional Gene Analysis during Pepper (Piper nigrum L.) Peeling.

Authors:  Jiachao Zhang; Qisong Hu; Chuanbiao Xu; Sixin Liu; Congfa Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Dietary Supplementation of Inulin Ameliorates Subclinical Mastitis via Regulation of Rumen Microbial Community and Metabolites in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Xuemei Nan; Yiguang Zhao; Linshu Jiang; Hui Wang; Fan Zhang; Dengke Hua; Jun Liu; Junhu Yao; Liang Yang; Qingyao Luo; Benhai Xiong
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-09-08

4.  Development of a rational framework for the therapeutic efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for calf diarrhea treatment.

Authors:  Jahidul Islam; Masae Tanimizu; Yu Shimizu; Yoshiaki Goto; Natsuki Ohtani; Kentaro Sugiyama; Eriko Tatezaki; Masumi Sato; Eiji Makino; Toru Shimada; Chise Ueda; Ayumi Matsuo; Yoshihisa Suyama; Yoshifumi Sakai; Mutsumi Furukawa; Katsuki Usami; Hiroshi Yoneyama; Hisashi Aso; Hidekazu Tanaka; Tomonori Nochi
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 14.650

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.