Jintao Zhang1, Zhenhai Xia2, Liming Dai1. 1. Center of Advanced Science and Engineering for Carbon (Case4Carbon), Department of Macromolecular Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. 2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Department of Chemistry, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA.
Abstract
Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) play curial roles in electrochemical energy conversion and storage, including fuel cells and metal-air batteries. Having rich multidimensional nanoarchitectures [for example, zero-dimensional (0D) fullerenes, 1D carbon nanotubes, 2D graphene, and 3D graphite] with tunable electronic and surface characteristics, various carbon nanomaterials have been demonstrated to act as efficient metal-free electrocatalysts for ORR and OER in fuel cells and batteries. We present a critical review on the recent advances in carbon-based metal-free catalysts for fuel cells and metal-air batteries, and discuss the perspectives and challenges in this rapidly developing field of practical significance.
pan class="Chemical">Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) andoxygen evolution reaction (OER) play curial roles in electrochemical energy conversion and storage, including fuel cells andmetal-air batteries. Having rich multidimensional nanoarchitectures [for example, zero-dimensional (0D) fullerenes, 1D carbon nanotubes, 2D graphene, and 3D graphite] with tunable electronicand surface characteristics, various carbon nanomaterials have been demonstrated to act as efficient metal-free electrocatalysts for ORR and OER in fuel cells and batteries. We present a critical review on the recent advances in carbon-based metal-free catalysts for fuel cells andmetal-air batteries, and discuss the perspectives andchallenges in this rapidly developing field of practicalsignificance.
With diminishing fospan class="Chemical">sil fuels, increasing demand on energy resources, and growing environmentalconcerns, the development of clean and sustainable energy conversion and storage systems with a high efficiency and low cost, such as fuel cells andmetal-air batteries, has become more important than ever (). However, implementing these energy technologies in our daily life is still a big challenge because catalysts are required for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in fuel cells and for both ORR andoxygen evolution reaction (OER) in rechargeable metal-air batteries (). Traditionally, platinum supported on carbons (Pt/C) has been regarded as the best catalyst for ORR, although it still suffers from multiple drawbacks, including its susceptibility to time-dependent drift, fuel crossover, andCO poisoning effects (, ). On the other hand, metal oxides (for example, RuO2, MnO2, andperovskite oxides) have been widely explored as electrocatalysts for OER (). However, the high cost and poor durability of noble metal/metal oxidecatalysts have precluded the commercialization of fuel cell andmetal-air battery technologies (). Therefore, the large-scale practical application of fuel cells andmetal-air batteries cannot be achieved unless the expensive noble metal (for example, platinum)/metal oxide electrocatalysts for ORR/OER are replaced by other efficient, low-cost, and durable electrode materials.
pan class="Chemical">Alopan class="Chemical">ng with the intensive research efforts in developing nonprecious metalcatalysts to reduce or replace noble metalcatalysts for clean and renewable energy technologies, we have discovered a new class of low-cost, metal-free ORR catalysts based on nitrogen (N)–dopedcarbon nanotubes (NCNTs), which performed better than platinum in alkaline fuel cells (). The improved catalytic performance for the NCNTs can be attributed to the electron-accepting ability of the nitrogen atoms, which creates net positive charge density on adjacent carbon atoms in the nanocarbon structure for changing the oxygen adsorption mode to facilitate ORR (). Subsequent research activities carried out in many laboratories worldwide, including our own, have not only confirmed the above findings but also provided further support for the important role of doping-induced charge transfer in the design and development of new metal-free catalytic materials for fuel cells andmetal-air batteries (–). It was further demonstrated that not only did those carbon nanomaterials [for example, one-dimensional (1D) CNTs and 2D graphene] doped/co-doped by various heteroatoms (for example, N, B, P, S, Br, Cl, and I) exhibit high ORR (–), but undopedcarbon nanomaterials adsorbed with polyelectrolytes also showed high ORR catalytic activities through intermolecular charge transfer (, ). We have also recently demonstrated that metal-free NCNTs and their graphenecomposites with porous structures perform better and are more durable than the state-of-the-art nonprecious iron–based catalyst even in acidicpolymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) ()—the mainstream fuel cell technology. Furthermore, recent papers (including those by our group) have reported that carbon nanomaterials can act as either monofunctional or bifunctionalmetal-free catalysts for ORR, OER, hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), carbon dioxide reduction (CDR), and even triiodide to iodide reduction—reactions crucial to fuel cells, metal-air batteries, water splitting for fuel generation, and dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) (–). Among them, 3D carbon nanoarchitectures with well-defined porous network structures and large surface/interface areas for a high density of active centers and efficient electron/electrolyte transports are of particular interest for high-performance electrolysis (). These studies represent major breakthroughs in the emerging field of carbon-based metal-free catalysts (–), which will remove the bottlenecks to translating low-cost, metal-free, carbon-based catalysts to commercial reality, and open avenues for clean energy generation and storage with affordable and durable fuel cells andmetal-air batteries. The widespread use of carbon-based metal-free catalysts will surely result in better fuel economy, lower harmful emissions, and less reliance on petroleum sources. This could markedly improve our daily life in the near future. Because so many carbon-based catalysts, along with the related theoretical work, have recently been reported, this once emerging field has grown to a critical point for a timely summary of the fruitful achievements and a critical outlook for future development. This article aims to provide a critical review of the recent progresses, along with perspectives andchallenges, in this fast-growing field of great significance.
EVALUATION OF ELECTROCATALYTIC ACTIVITY TOWARD ORR AND OER
In principn>le, pan class="Chemical">oxygen reduction can occur in both alkaline and acidic media either through a two-electron transfer process to produce peroxide species as an intermediate, followed by further reduction to OH−/water, or through a more efficient four-electron transfer to directly produce H2O as the only by-product (Scheme 1) ():
Scheme 1
The process of oxygen reduction reaction.
The oxygen reduction reaction in acid and alkaline media, respectively.
The process of oxygen reduction reaction.
The oxygen reduction reaction in acid andalkaline media, respectively.To evpan class="Chemical">aluate the electrocatalytic activity of catalysts for ORR in aqueous electrolytes, the most commonly used techniques include rotating disc electrode (RDE), rotating ring-disc electrode (RRDE), linear scan voltammetry (LSV), and steady-state polarization (). The overall measured ORR current (J) is dependent on the kineticcurrent (Jk) and diffusion-limitingcurrent (Jd), as shown in Eq. 1. Jk is determined by the reaction kinetic process. If the applied overpotential is high enough, however, every atom/ion reaching the electrode reacts immediately; thus, the reactant (for example, O2) concentration at the electrode surface becomes nearly zero, leading to a diffusion-limitingcurrent (that is, Jd). Jd is only determined by the rate of diffusion. Because the diffusion rate depends on the rotating speed in an RDE measurement, Jd is determined by the rate at which the reactant diffuses to the surface of the electrode. When the small effect of Nafion film diffusion on the rotating electrode is neglected, the overall measured current, J, is given by the Koutecky-Levich equation (, ):where ω is the electrode rotating rate. B is determined from the slope of the Koutecky-Levich plot based on the Levich equation below:
In Eq. 2, n represents the pan class="Gene">transferred electron number per oxygen molecules, F is the Faraday constant (F = 96,485 C mol−1), is the diffusion coefficient of O2 in electrolyte, υ is the kinetic viscosity, and is the bulk concentration or solubility of O2. The constant 0.2 is adopted when the rotation speed is expressed in rpm.
Figure 1A represents the typipan class="Chemical">cpan class="Chemical">al LSV curves of ORR tested on RDE at various rotating speeds, showing an increased Jd with increasing rotating speeds due to the enhanced oxygen diffusion to and reduction at the electrode surface. At high overpotentials, the oxygen reduction is so fast that a limiting plateau is achieved (Fig. 1A). This current plateau would be associated with the distribution of the electrocatalyticsites on the electrode surfaces (). Typically, the uniform distribution of active sites leads to a fine current plateau. In contrast, the current plateau is more inclined if the distribution of active sites is less uniform and the electrocatalytic reaction is slower. n and Jk can be obtained by Koutecky-Levich plots, in which the diffusion limitation can be eliminated. Alternatively, RRDE can be used to determine the kinetics and mechanism of ORR. This technology can quantitatively evaluate the molar proportion of produced H2O2/HO2− on the ring electrode (platinum or gold, Fig. 1B). The discand ringcurrents (ID and IR, respectively) are recorded as a function of the disc electrode potential (Fig. 1B). Taking into account that the total disccurrent, ID, is the sum of the O2 reduction currents to water, , and intermediate (H2O2), , and using the collection efficiency (N), we have Eq. 3:
Fig. 1
Evaluation of electrocatalytic activities toward ORR and OER.
(A) LSV curves of electrocatalysts in oxygen-saturated electrolyte with different rotating rates. (B) Oxygen reduction curves on the disc and ring electrodes of RRDE at 5 mV s−1 scan rate at 1600 rpm, respectively. (C) Exemplary OER currents of La1−CaCoO3 and LaCoO3 thin films on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH at 10 mV s−1 scan rate at 1600 rpm, capacitance-corrected by taking an average of the positive and negative scans. The contributions from AB (acetylene black) and binder (Nafion) in the thin film and GCE are shown for comparison. (D) Evidence of O2 generated from Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3− (BSCF) using RRDE measurements (schematic shown as an inset). The O2 gas generated from BSCF on a GCE disc (OER current given as idisc) is reduced at the Pt ring at a constant potential of 0.4 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). The collecting efficiency of RRED is 0.2. [From J. Suntivich, K. J. May, H. A. Gasteiger, J. B. Goodenough, Y. Shao-Horn, A perovskite oxide optimized for oxygen evolution catalysis from molecular orbital principles. Science
334, 1383–1385 (2011). Reprinted with permission from AAAS.]
Evaluation of electrocatalytic activities toward ORR and OER.
(A) LSV curves of electrocatalysts in oxygen-saturated electrolyte with different rotating rates. (B) Oxygen reduction curves on the discand ring electrodes of RRDE at 5 mV s−1 scan rate at 1600 rpm, respectively. (C) Exemplary OER currents of La1−CaCoO3 andLaCoO3 thin films on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH at 10 mV s−1 scan rate at 1600 rpm, capacitance-corrected by taking an average of the positive and negative scans. The contributions from AB (acetylene black) and binder (Nafion) in the thin film and GCE are shown for comparison. (D) Evidence of O2 generated from Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3− (BSCF) using RRDE measurements (schematic shown as an inset). The O2 gas generated from BSCF on a GCE disc (OER current given as idisc) is reduced at the Pt ring at a constant potential of 0.4 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). The collecting efficiency of RRED is 0.2. [From J. Suntivich, K. J. May, H. A. Gasteiger, J. B. Goodenough, Y. Shao-Horn, A perovskite oxide optimized for oxygen evolution catalysis from molecular orbital principles. Science
334, 1383–1385 (2011). Reprinted with permission from AAAS.]The H2O2 yield (%n>an class="Chemical">H2O2) and the electron transfer number (n) are determined by the following equations (, , ):where N is the current collection efficiency of the ring electrode. The collection efficiency is defined as N = −IR/ID and is usually determined by using the [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3− redox couple ().
RDE pan class="Chemical">and RRDE measurements are also used to evaluate the catalytic activity of electrocatalysts toward OER. As a typical example, representative OER currents of oxidescollected by using a thin-film RDE are shown in Fig. 1C (), which is a powerful method to determine better catalytic activity by the lower onset potential with a shaper current rise. To ensure that the observed oxidation current is from oxygen evolution, RRDE with a Pt ringcan be used to detect the current for the electrochemical reduction of O2 generated at the disc with an electrocatalyst (Fig. 1D). The measurements can also lead to insights into the reaction mechanism of OER with various electrocatalysts.
In comparison with the relatively well-established evpan class="Chemical">aluation procedures for Pt-based catalysts (for example, electrochemical active surface), the electrocatalyticcharacterization of carbon electrocatalysts is still under development and has to be optimized. Especially, the inclined current plateau in the ORR polarization curve is commonly observed, possibly suggesting the presence of by-products (for example, H2O2) and/or the nonuniform distribution of active sites. Thus, the conclusion on the electrocatalytic activity of carbon-based catalysts should be reached on the basis of the proper electrode preparation. Furthermore, the performance of these electrocatalysts still needs to be further demonstrated in actual operating fuel cells or metal-air batteries.
HETEROATOM-DOPED CARBONS AS METAL-FREE CATALYSTS IN FUEL CELLS
A fuel cell is an electrochemical device to directly convert chemical energy into electricity by oxidizing fuels (for example, hydrogen, methanol, ethanol, andformic acid) at the anode and reducingoxygen at the cathode. Figure 2 shows the typical steady-state polarization curve of PEMFCs (), which describes the relationship between the electrode potentialand the current density for evaluating both ORR and fuel cell performance. The criteria to evaluate a polarization curve depend on its application (). It can be seen in Fig. 2 that the fuel cell voltage is significantly deviated from the theoretical potential (also called reversible standard potential, 1.23 V) (). The loss could be attributed to electrode kinetics (electron transfer overpotential), slow mass transport (diffusion overpotential), and slow chemical reactions coupled to the electron transfer (reaction overpotential). We note that the sluggish ORR is about six or more orders of magnitude slower than the hydrogen oxidation reaction in a PEMFC (). Thus, ORR has a limiting factor to the cell performance, which requires a platinumcatalyst (see above). Because of the high cost and poor durability intrinsically associated with platinumcatalysts, the development of nonprecious metalandmetal-free catalysts with high ORR activities has become the major focus of fuel cell research (, ).
Fig. 2
Polarization curve of PEMFC.
The typical polarization curve describes the relationship between cell voltage and current density used to evaluate cell performance. The various losses are shown in the same figure, indicating different overpotential sources. [From V. Ramani, H. R. Kunz, J. M. Fenton, The polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Electrochem. Soc. Interface
13, 17 (2004). Reprinted with permission from the Electrochemical Society.]
Polarization curve of PEMFC.
The typipan class="Chemical">cpan class="Chemical">al polarization curve describes the relationship between cell voltage andcurrent density used to evaluate cell performance. The various losses are shown in the same figure, indicating different overpotential sources. [From V. Ramani, H. R. Kunz, J. M. Fenton, The polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Electrochem. Soc. Interface
13, 17 (2004). Reprinted with permission from the ElectrochemicalSociety.]
To reduce or repn>lace Pt-based electrocatalysts in fuel cells, metal porphyrins or phthalocyanines have been found to exhibit good oxygen reduction performance, but a poor stability, since the 1960s (, ). A recent breakthrough was then achieved by mimicking the atomicconfiguration of metal porphyrinandphthalocyanine using individualnitrogenandCo/Fe precursors (, ). By modifyingcarbon particles with polypyrrole for adsorption of cobalt ions, for example, the resultant cobalt-polypyrrolecomposite catalyst with C-Co-N active sites was demonstrated to combine high oxygen-reduction activity with good operation durability. More specifically, the cobalt-polypyrrolecomposite catalyst showed a power density of about 0.15 W cm2 in H2-O2 fuel cells and did not display obvious performance degradation for more than 100 hours (). Similar catalysts with C-M-N (typically, M = Co, Fe) have been developed by incorporatingiron or cobalt into various nitrogen-rich polymer precursors, such as polypyrrole (), polyaniline (), phenanthroline (), and2,6-diaminopyridine (), under high-temperature processes. In addition, a new class of metal-free ORR catalysts based on carbon nanomaterials doped with heteroatom(s) has recently been discovered ().pan class="Chemical">Nitrogen atoms can be doped into the basal plane of a graphiticcarbon (graphene) sheet in several different configurations (Fig. 3) (, ). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is a commonly used technique to examine the features of nitrogen species in N-dopedcarbon nanomaterials. The characteristic XPS peaks for pyridinic (N-6), pyrolic (N-5), and graphitic (N-Q) nitrogen are located at about 398.6, 400.5, and 401.4 eV (, ), respectively, as shown in Fig. 3. These different nitrogenconfigurations could vary the electronic structure of neighbor carbon atomsand then affect physicalandchemical properties, such as electricalconductivity and electrocatalytic activity (). Previous studies have shown that the edge structure anddoped-N near the edge could significantly enhance the ORR activity through the four-electron pathway (, ). In addition, the armchair and zigzag sites located at the edges through the sp2 hybridization are high energy sites, which could be functionalized with heteroatoms to provide strong electrochemical activities (Fig. 3). Several research groups have reported that the pyridinic N was the active site to enhance the ORR activity of the N-dopedcarbon materials (, –), whereas some others suggested that more graphiticnitrogen atoms, rather than the pyridinic ones, are important for the ORR (, ). Therefore, the exact catalytic role for each of the nitrogen forms in nanocarbon ORR catalysts is still a matter of controversy. An interconversion of the graphitic to pyridinicsites through the ring opening of a cyclic C-N bond or vice versa has been proposed to reconcile the controversy over whether the graphitic, pyridinic, or both nitrogens are active sites for ORR ().
Fig. 3
Scheme illustration of nitrogen species in nitrogen-containing graphitic carbons.
The commonly doped nitrogen species in graphitic carbons with the corresponding reported XPS binding energies.
Scheme illustration of nitrogen species in nitrogen-containing graphitic carbons.
The commonly n>an class="Chemical">dopednitrogen species in graphiticcarbons with the corresponding reported XPS binding energies.
Heteroatom-doped CNTs
The location pan class="Chemical">control of dopants in the heteroatom-dopedcarbon nanomaterials should provide us with powerful means to tailor the structure-property relationships for heteroatom-dopedcarbon-based metal-free catalysts. Although the accurate control of the nitrogen dopingsites in carbon nanomaterials is still impossible, a few approaches, including the use of N-containing macromolecular precursors with N-rich cycles (for example, triazineandphthalocyanine derivatives) of precisely controlled locations of N atomsand hole sizes, followed by carbonization, have led to the formation of well-controlled N-doped holey graphene nanosheets (, ). We have also used N-containingiron phthalocyanine as the precursor for the synthesis of vertically aligned NCNTs (VA-NCNTs) by chemicalvapor deposition (CVD) (Fig. 4A). After removal of iron residue, if any, the VA-NCNTs thus prepared were shown to catalyze a four-electron ORR process free from CO “poisoning” with a much higher electrocatalytic activity and better durability than those of commercially available Pt/C in alkaline electrolytes (Fig. 4, B to E) (). According to the experimental observations and theoreticalcalculations by B3LYP hybrid density functional theory (DFT), the improved catalytic performance can be contributed to the electron-accepting ability of the nitrogen atoms, which creates a net positive charge on adjacent carbon atoms in the CNT plane of VA-NCNTs (Fig. 4F). The nitrogen-induced charge delocalization could also change the chemisorption mode of O2 from the usual end-on adsorption (Pauling model) at the nitrogen-free CNT (CCNT) surface (Fig. 4G, top) to a side-on adsorption (Yeager model) onto the NCNT electrodes (Fig. 4G, bottom). The N-doping induced charge transfer from adjacent carbon atomscould lower the ORR potential, whereas the parallel diatomic adsorption could effectively weaken the O-O bonding, facilitating ORR at the VA-NCNT electrodes. Uncovering this ORR mechanism in the NCNT electrodes is significant because the same principle has been applied to the development of various other metal-free efficient ORR catalysts for fuel cells and other applications (, ).
Fig. 4
Morphology characterization and catalytic performance of VA-NCNTs.
(A) Scanning electron microscopy image of the as-synthesized VA-NCNTs on a quartz substrate. Scale bar, 2 μm. (B) Digital photograph of the VA-NCNT array after having been transferred onto a polystyrene (PS) and nonaligned CNT conductive composite film. (C) RDE voltammograms for oxygen reduction in air-saturated 0.1 M KOH at the Pt/C (curve 1), VA-CCNT (curve 2), and VA-NCNT (curve 3) electrodes. (D) Cyclic voltammograms for the ORR at the Pt/C (top) and VA-NCNT (bottom) electrodes before (solid curves) and after (dotted curves) a continuous potentiodynamic sweep for about 100,000 cycles in air-saturated 0.1 M KOH at room temperature (25 ± 1°C). Scan rate: 100 mV s−1. (E) The CO poisoning effect on the i-t chronoamperometric response for the Pt/C (black curve) and VA-NCNT (red line) electrodes. CO gas (55 ml/min) was first added into the 550 ml/min O2 flow, and then the mixture gas of ~9% CO (v/v) was introduced into the electrochemical cell at about 1700s. (F) Calculated charge density distribution for the NCNTs. (G) Schematic representations of possible adsorption modes of an oxygen molecule at the CCNTs (top) and NCNTs (bottom). [From K. Gong, F. Du, Z. Xia, M. Durstock, L. Dai, Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube arrays with high electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction. Science
323, 760–764 (2009). Reprinted with permission from AAAS.]
Morphology characterization and catalytic performance of VA-NCNTs.
(A) Scannipan class="Chemical">ng electron microscopy image of the as-synthesized VA-NCNTs on a quartz substrate. Scale bar, 2 μm. (B) Digital photograph of the VA-NCNT array after having been transferred onto a polystyrene (PS) and nonaligned CNTconductive composite film. (C) RDE voltammograms for oxygen reduction in air-saturated 0.1 M KOH at the Pt/C (curve 1), VA-CCNT (curve 2), andVA-NCNT (curve 3) electrodes. (D) Cyclic voltammograms for the ORR at the Pt/C (top) andVA-NCNT (bottom) electrodes before (solid curves) and after (dotted curves) a continuous potentiodynamic sweep for about 100,000 cycles in air-saturated 0.1 M KOH at room temperature (25 ± 1°C). Scan rate: 100 mV s−1. (E) The CO poisoning effect on the i-t chronoamperometric response for the Pt/C (black curve) andVA-NCNT (red line) electrodes. CO gas (55 ml/min) was first added into the 550 ml/min O2 flow, and then the mixture gas of ~9% CO (v/v) was introduced into the electrochemicalcell at about 1700s. (F) Calculated charge density distribution for the NCNTs. (G) Schematic representations of possible adsorption modes of an oxygen molecule at the CCNTs (top) and NCNTs (bottom). [From K. Gong, F. Du, Z. Xia, M. Durstock, L. Dai, Nitrogen-dopedcarbon nanotube arrays with high electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction. Science
323, 760–764 (2009). Reprinted with permission from AAAS.]
To examine the chemipan class="Chemical">cal nature of active sites and optimize the content of nitrogen in carbon lattices for ORR, many groups, including our own ones, have synthesized NCNTs with different nitrogencontents using different precursors (, –). For instance, NCNT/nanoparticle composites were obtained from iron acetate as an iron precursor and from cyanamide as a nitrogenandCNT precursor for ORR electrocatalysts (). NCNTs with relatively high nitrogencontents have also been prepared by increasing the precursor ratio (pyridine to ethanol) for CVD (). Such NCNTs exhibited a positive correlation between nitrogencontent and electrocatalytic activity toward ORR. The nitrogencontents in NCNT arrays have also been adjusted by changing the pyrolysis temperature. The NCNTs with a high content of pyridinic-type nitrogen showed excellent activity toward ORR and much better activity in alkaline medium than that in an acidic medium (). The influence of nitrogenconcentration in the NCNTs on the electronic, structural, and electrochemical properties has been examined, showing an increase in the bulk electricalconductivity and the density of states at the Fermi level with the increased nitrogen doping in CNTs ().This could also result in chemically active, localized areas of higher electron density to promote the electrocatalysis of ORR. Theoreticalsimulations indicated that the presence of nitrogencould reduce the barrier to ORR at neighbor carbon atoms ().
Because the pan class="Chemical">CVD process for producing the VA-NCNTs involves metalcatalysts (for example, Fe), considerable care has been taken during the electrode preparation to completely remove the catalyst residue. However, there are still some concerns on the possible effects of metalcontaminates on the observed superb ORR performance (–) unless N-dopedcarbon materials with excellent ORR electrocatalytic activities can be produced by a metal-free preparation procedure. In this context, NCNTs with a high nitrogen doping level (~20 atomic %) have recently been synthesized directly by usingmelamine as a C/N precursor in the absence of metalcatalyst (), displaying excellent ORR catalytic activity comparable to that of Pt/Ccatalysts with outstanding stability, fuel selectivity, and resistance to CO poisoning. Similarly, many other heteroatom-dopedcarbon nanomaterials generated from metal-free preparation procedures also showed outstanding ORR activities in both alkaline and acid electrolytes (, , –). Therefore, the observed ORR activities in these cases are exclusively attributed to intrinsic nonmetal active sites in N-dopedcarbons.
Subsequent studies extended to the other heteroatoms with different electronegativities (x) from that of carbon (x = 2.5), such as boron (x = 2.0) andphosphorus (x = 2.1), for enhancing the ORR activity. For instance, Yang et al. () have demonstrated that boron with a lower electronegativity than carboncould dope CNTs into metal-free ORR catalysts with positively shifted potentials and enhanced reduction current, as well as good stability and high resistance toward methanolcrossover andCO poisoning. The experimentaland theoretical results suggest that the doping-induced charge redistribution, regardless of whether the dopants have a higher (as N) or lower (as B) electronegativity than that of carbon, could create charged sites (C+ or B+) that are favorable for O2 adsorption and subsequent reduction process (). We have successfully prepared vertically aligned CNTs containing both nitrogenandboron heteroatoms (VA-BCN) and found that the resultant VA-BCN nanotubes exhibited a higher electrocatalytic activity for ORR in alkaline medium than VA-CNTsdoped with either boron or nitrogen only (). Thus, the dual-dopedCNTs with heteroatoms, one with higher and one with lower negativity than that of carbon, showed a synergetic effect arising from the co-doping (). Theoreticalcalculations revealed that co-dopedCNTs with separated B-Cand N-C are capable of turning the inert CNTs into efficient ORR catalysts, whereas the bonded boronandnitrogen (B-N-C) cannot because charge neutralization between the bonded boronandnitrogen leads to unfavorable chemisorption of O2 on the co-dopedCNTs (). Experimentally, the observed co-doping–induced synergetic effect has been applied to CNTs co-doped with other heteroatoms, includingphosphorus (P), sulfur (S), andnitrogen (N), for high-performance electrocatalysis of ORR (, –), and opens up novel avenues for designingvarious efficient metal-free ORR catalysts through co-dopingcarbon nanomaterials with more than one heteroatoms of different electronegativities.In addition to the ORR apan class="Chemical">ctivities aripan class="Chemical">sing from the heteroatom-doping–induced intramolecular charge redistribution discussed above, poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride)-adsorbed undopedCNTs were also demonstrated to act as metal-free catalysts for ORR through the intermolecular charge transfer from the all-carbonCNTs to the adsorbed polyelectrolyte (). More recently, phosphorus-encapsulated single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) were also demonstrated to exhibit improved ORR activity, though relatively inferior to the commercialPt/C electrode, due to the good electron-accepting properties of the filled phosphorusclusters that create a large number of positively charged sites on the carbon plane (). These results indicate the important role of intermolecular charge transfer to ORR for carbon nanomaterials.
Heteroatom-doped graphene
pan class="Chemical">Graphene, a 2D pan class="Chemical">single-atom-thick layer of sp2 hybridized carbons tightly bonded in a hexagonal lattice, is the basic building block for all other graphiticcarbons, includingCNTs. Havingmany similarities to CNTs in structure and property, such as high aspect ratio (the ratio of lateralsize to thickness), large surface area, rich electronic states, andgood mechanical properties, graphene is an attractive candidate for potential uses in many areas where the CNTs have been exploited. In comparison with CNTs, the graphene sheets with a 2D planar geometry will further facilitate electron transport, and hence are efficient electrode materials for potential uses as metal-free ORR catalysts (, , ).
Soon after the dispan class="Chemical">covery of ORR activity of the VA-NCNTs (), Qu et al. () further demonstrated that N-doped graphene (NG) films produced by CVD in the presence of ammonia had a superb ORR performance in alkaline medium that was comparable to that of VA-NCNTs with the same nitrogencontent. Like NCNTs, the electronicandchemical properties of graphenecan also be modulated by chemical doping with heteroatoms (). Unlike NCNTs, graphene materials and their N-doped derivatives with different sizes, qualities, and prices for various specific applications can be produced by CVD and arc discharge of graphite electrodes as well as various large-scale preparation methods, such as liquid-phase exfoliation and molecular assembling (Fig. 5) (). For instance, a novel method for one-pot direct synthesis of NG through the reaction of tetrachloromethane with lithium nitride under mild conditions has been reported (), which led to a nitrogencontent in the range of 4.5 to 16.4% and an enhanced catalytic ORR activity with respect to pure grapheneandcommercialcarbon black XC-72. Multilayered NG films with a uniform structure and a nitrogencontent of 12.5% have also been synthesized from a detonation reaction between cyanuric chlorideandtrinitrophenol (). In a phosphate buffer solution, the resultant NG acted as a metal-free electrode with an excellent electrocatalytic activity and long-term operation stability for ORR through combined two- and four-electron pathways.
Fig. 5
Scheme illustration of methods for mass production of graphene.
The various methods for graphene production allowing a wide choice in terms of size, quality, and price for specific applications. [From K. S. Novoselov, V. I. Fal’ko, L. Colombo, P. R. Gellert, M. G. Schwab, K. Kim, A roadmap for graphene. Nature
490, 192–200 (2012). Reprinted with permission from the Nature Publishing Group.]
Scheme illustration of methods for mass production of graphene.
The pan class="Chemical">various methods for pan class="Chemical">graphene production allowing a wide choice in terms of size, quality, and price for specific applications. [From K. S. Novoselov, V. I. Fal’ko, L. Colombo, P. R. Gellert, M. G. Schwab, K. Kim, A roadmap for graphene. Nature
490, 192–200 (2012). Reprinted with permission from the Nature Publishing Group.]
pan class="Chemical">Graphitic carbon nitride, pan class="Chemical">g-C3N4, a carbonaceous material that has a planar phase analogous to graphite, has also been extensively investigated for metal-free electrocatalysis of ORR (, ). g-C3N4can be readily obtained through the pyrolysis of cyanamide (), melamine (), ethylenediamine/carbon tetrachloride (), or s-triazine derivatives () through condensation. Lyth et al. () investigated the ORR activity of carbon nitride in oxygen-saturated sulfuric acid solution and found a much higher onset potential of 0.69 V (versus NHE) than that (0.45 V) for a carbon black reference electrode. A relatively low current density for the carbon nitride electrode (0.72 versus 0.91 mA cm−2 for the carbon black electrode) was observed, which could be attributed to its low surface area (5 m2 g−1) and poor electricconductivity. In the same study, a significant improvement in both current density (2.21 mA cm−2) and onset potential (up to 0.76 V) was achieved by blending the carbon nitride with a high surface area carbon black support (50 wt %). To prepare carbon nitride materials with enhanced electricalconductivity and surface accessibility, several innovative approaches have been devised by incorporatingg-C3N4 into mesoporouscarbon with a large surface area (), immobilizingg-C3N4 onto chemically converted graphene (CCG) sheets to form a composite (G-g-C3N4) through polymerization of melamine molecules adsorbed on CCG sheets at a high temperature of 823 K (), and preparing the macroporous g-C3N4/C with 3D ordered interconnected structures usingsilica microspheres as hard templates (). These methods led to g-C3N4composites with an enhanced electron transfer efficiency, ORR catalytic activity, fuel crossover resistance, and long-term durability, comparable to or, even better, than that of the commercialPt/C in alkaline medium. On the other hand, Yang et al. () fabricated g-C3N4 nanosheets with interdispersed graphene layers to show a high nitrogencontent, high surface area, large aspect ratio, and enhanced electricalconductivity attractive for electrocatalysis.
pan class="Chemical">Alternatively, the solution oxidation of pan class="Chemical">graphite with strong oxidizing reagents (for example, HNO3, KMnO4, and/or H2SO4) to produce solution-processable graphene oxide (GO) sheets with reactive carboxylic acid groups at the edge and epoxy andhydroxyl groups on its basal plane is one of the most popular methods for mass production of soluble graphene materials (, ). Subsequent reduction of GO sheets using a reducing regent or thermal treatment led to electrically conductive reduced graphene oxide (RGO) sheets on a large scale. N-doped RGO (NRGO) can be prepared by posttreatments of GO (or RGO) with various nitrogen-containing species, includingammonia (), melamine (), polyaniline (), pyrrole (), urea (), and ionic liquid (). These approaches could avoid the contamination of metalcatalysts, and thus, the intrinsiccatalytic performance of metal-free doped graphenecan be examined. Usingmelamine as the nitrogen precursor, Sheng et al. () reported that the atomic percentage of nitrogen in NRGO samples could be adjusted up to 10.1%, mainly containingpyridine-like nitrogen atoms. Pyrolysis of well-mixed GOandurea in an inert environment has also resulted in the formation of NRGO with a high percentage of graphiticnitrogen, in which GO was thermally reduced andN atoms were doped into the graphitic lattice (). The resultant NRGO exhibited a high catalytic activity toward the ORR through a four-electron pathway with superior stability and anti-crossover property to Pt/Ccatalysts. In addition, Lai andco-workers () have demonstrated that the bonding state of the N atom had a significant effect on the selectivity andcatalytic activity for ORR. Specifically, these authors found that graphiticand pyridinic N centers were preferentially formed by annealingGO with ammonia, whereas annealing of polyaniline/RGOandpolypyrrole/RGO tended to generate pyridinicand pyrrolic N moieties. It has been revealed that pyridinic N can contribute one p-electron to the aromatic system and has a lone electron pair in the plane of carbon matrix, which can increase the electron-donor property of the catalyst. Thus, it would weaken the O-O bond through the bonding between oxygenandnitrogenand/or the adjacent carbon atom to facilitate the reduction of O2. However, the total N content in the NRGOcatalyst played a much less important role in the ORR process in this particular case.
In addition to N-dopipan class="Chemical">ng, pan class="Chemical">graphene materials doped with other heteroatoms, such as S (), P (), B (), andhalogen (), have also been studied. Among them, sulfur has a similar electronegativity to that of carbon, and hence no doping-induced charge transfer. Nevertheless, graphene materials doped with sulfuralso exhibit better catalytic activity than do the commercialPt/C in alkaline media (), presumably due to the doping-induced spin redistribution effect (). Dopinggraphite layers with P, an element of the same number of valence electrons andsimilar chemical properties as N, by pyrolysis of tolueneandtriphenylphosphine (TPP) also showed high electrocatalytic activity toward the ORR, long-term stability, and excellent tolerance to the methanolcrossover effect in alkaline medium (). These results not only shed light on the metal-free ORR mechanism for the dopedcarbon nanomaterials but also open new ways for scalable fabrication of other low-cost, metal-free electrocatalysts.
Recent efforts have led to solution-processable edge-functionalized graphene (EFG) sheets. Through a simple one-pot reaction, for example, Jeon andco-workers () have prepared edge-functionalized graphene nanoplatelets (EFGnPs) with aminobenzoyl moiety, which could be used as the in situ feedstock for “C-welding” and “N-doping” to produce high-quality NG films without introducing any oxygen-containing surface groups on the graphene basal plane. By solution casting the NG on a GC electrode and subsequent heat treatment, these authors demonstrated comparable ORR performance to the NG prepared by CVD. On the other hand, Jeon andco-workers () have also developed a low-cost and scalable ball milling method to produce high-quality, edge-functionalized NG films. By ball millinggraphite with dry ice in a planetary ball-mill machine, Jeon andco-workers () initially produced edge-selectively carboxylated graphite (ECG), which is highly dispersable in many solvents to self-exfoliate into single- or few-layer graphene sheets. By replacing dry ice with N2 gas, the same authors have developed a simple approach to direct fixation of N2 into graphene nanoplatelets (GnPs) to form five- andsix-membered aromatic rings at the broken edges (), leading to solution-processable edge-nitrogenated graphene nanoplatelets (NGnPs) with superb electrocatalytic performance. As shown in Fig. 6, ball millinggraphite in the presence of reactants other than dry ice or N2 (for example, halogen) is an efficient approach to scalable production of EFGnPs with various edge-functional groups (Fig. 6A) (, ). For instance, GnPs functionalized with hydrogen (HGnP), carboxylic acid (CGnP), sulfonic acid (SGnP), and mixed carboxylic acid/sulfonic acid (CSGnP) have been synthesized in the presence of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, sulfur trioxide, or carbon dioxide/sulfur trioxide mixture (, ). One of the salient features of EFGnPs is that the reaction medium does not intercalate into graphite but selectively functionalizes the sp2C-H defects at the edges of graphite, leading to minimalcarbon basal plane damage, and hence the formation of highly conductive electrodes. Electrochemical measurements indicated that the ORR activity of EFGnP electrodes follows the order of SGnP > CSGnP > CGnP > HGnP > pristine graphite. Among them, the sulfur-containingSGnPandCSGnP have superior ORR performance to the Pt/C electrocatalysts. Oxidation of SGnP into SOGnP further improved the ORR catalytic activity (). Theoreticalcalculations showed that the electronic spin density, in addition to generally considered charge density, played a key role in the high ORR activity of SGnPand SOGnP. Furthermore, both SGnPand SOGnP demonstrated a better fuel selectivity with a longer-term stability than those of the pristine graphiteandcommercialPt/C electrocatalysts.
Fig. 6
Schematic illustration of the preparation of EFGnPs through the ball-milling method for ORR.
(A) Schematic representation of the mechanochemical reaction between in situ generated active carbon species and reactant gases in a sealed ball-mill crusher. The cracking of graphite by ball milling in the presence of corresponding gases and subsequent exposure to air moisture resulted in the formation of EFGnPs. The red balls stand for reactant gases such as hydrogen, carbon dioxide, sulfur trioxide, and air moisture (oxygen and moisture). [Derived from (), Copyright 2012 National Academy of Sciences.] (B) A schematic representation for the edge expansions of XGnPs caused by the edge halogens: ClGnP, BrGnP, and IGnP. (C) The optimized O2 adsorption geometries onto XGnPs, in which halogen covalently linked to two sp2 carbons. In (C), the O-O bond length and the shortest C-O bond are shown in angstrom. [From I.-Y. Jeon, H.-J. Choi, M. Choi, J.-M. Seo, S.-M. Jung, M.-J. Kim, S. Zhang, L. Zhang, Z. Xia, L. Dai, N. Park, J.-B. Baek, Facile, scalable synthesis of edge-halogenated graphene nanoplatelets as efficient metal-free eletrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Sci. Rep.
3, 1810 (2013). Reprinted with permission from the Nature Publishing Group.]
Schematic illustration of the preparation of EFGnPs through the ball-milling method for ORR.
(A) Schematipan class="Chemical">c representation of the mechanochemical reaction between in situ generated active carbon species and reactant gases in a sealed ball-mill crusher. The cracking of graphite by ball milling in the presence of corresponding gases and subsequent exposure to air moisture resulted in the formation of EFGnPs. The red balls stand for reactant gases such as hydrogen, carbon dioxide, sulfur trioxide, and air moisture (oxygenand moisture). [Derived from (), Copyright 2012 National Academy of Sciences.] (B) A schematic representation for the edge expansions of XGnPscaused by the edge halogens: ClGnP, BrGnP, and IGnP. (C) The optimized O2 adsorption geometries onto XGnPs, in which halogencovalently linked to two sp2carbons. In (C), the O-O bond length and the shortest C-O bond are shown in angstrom. [From I.-Y. Jeon, H.-J. Choi, M. Choi, J.-M. Seo, S.-M. Jung, M.-J. Kim, S. Zhang, L. Zhang, Z. Xia, L. Dai, N. Park, J.-B. Baek, Facile, scalable synthesis of edge-halogenated graphene nanoplatelets as efficient metal-free eletrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Sci. Rep.
3, 1810 (2013). Reprinted with permission from the Nature Publishing Group.]
It is worth mentionipan class="Chemical">ng that the dry ball milling method is quite general. By ball millinggraphite with Cl2, Br2, and I2, a series of edge-selectively halogenated GnPs (XGnPs, X = Cl, Br, I) have been prepared (Fig. 6B) (). Although the electron negativities of halogen atoms are in the order of Cl (x = 3.16) > Br (x = 2.96) > I (x = 2.66), the experimentally observed electrocatalytic activities for ORR are in the order of IGnP > BrGnP > ClGnP. Compared to the pristine graphiteandPt/C, IGnP exhibited much better electrocatalytic performances with an excellent long-term durability and tolerance to methanolcrossover/CO poisoning effects. Considering the difference in the electronegativity between halogens (Cl x = 3.16, Br x = 2.96, and I x = 2.66) andcarbon (x = 2.55), the reversed order of ORR activities, ClGnP << BrGnP < IGnP, seems contradictory to the doping-induced charge transfer effect (). In comparison to Cl, however, Brand I can form partially ionized bonds of -Br+- and -I+- to further enhance the charge transfer because of their relatively larger atomicsizes. The larger atomicsize leads to more loosely bound valence electrons for easy charge polarization in the BrGnPand IGnP electrodes. According to DFT calculations, halogenated edges, in which halogen atoms substitute for the Csites in the zigzag edges, show desirable binding affinity with O2 molecules (Fig. 6C). The efficiency of the charge transfer between the halogenand adsorbed O2 follows the atomicsize in the order of Cl < Br < I. The charge transfer–induced weakening of the O-O bond strength is most prominent for the case of IGnP, leading to the best catalytic activity. These new insights on the ORR of the edge-functionalized GnPscould provide practical approaches to designing high-performance metal-free ORR electrocatalysts through low-cost and scalable ball milling techniques, which have many advantages over the commonly used solution synthetic method ().
pan class="Chemical">Similarly to pan class="Chemical">co-dopedCNTs, co-dopinggraphene with two heteroatoms, one with higher (for example, N, x = 3.04) and another with lower (for example, B, x = 2.04) electronegativity than that of C (x = 2.55), can create a unique electronic structure, leading to synergistic effects with a higher electrocatalytic activity than singly dopedcounterparts. In this context, we have successfully developed a facile low-cost approach to mass production of co-doped graphene with tunable N-/B-doping levels simply by thermally annealing RGO in the presence of boric acid in ammonia atmosphere (). The first-principles calculations revealed a doping-level–dependent energy bandgap, spin density, andcharge density. The substitution of C with B and N led to a smaller energy gap. However, overdoping of B and N showed a detrimental effect on the conjugation length, which is accompanied by a drastic increase in the energy gap and a reduced conductivity, significantly affecting its electron transfer andcatalyticcapability. In agreement with the theoretical results, BCN graphene with a modest N- and B-doping level was demonstrated to have the best ORR electrocatalytic activity, fuel selectivity, and long-term durability, along with an excellent thermal stability and porosity. Subsequently, a two-step method was developed for incorporating N and B sequentially into selected sites of the graphene domain to further enhance the electrocatalytic activity toward ORR ().
The pan class="Chemical">co-dopn>ipan class="Chemical">ng–induced synergistic effect has also been observed when S and N were simultaneously incorporated into graphene to form dual-doped graphene (). S and N co-doped graphene (N-S-G) materials with large mesopores favorable for mass transfer () were found to exhibit a good electrocatalytic activity, long durability, and high selectivity for ORRs, comparable to that of commercialPt/Candsignificantly better than that of graphenecatalysts doped solely with S atoms (S-G) or with N atoms (N-G). Although the similar electronegativities between S (x = 2.58) andC atoms (x = 2.55) resulted in a negligible charge transfer between S andC, the DFT calculations indicated that the dual doping of S and N induced asymmetrical spin andcharge density in the N-S-G models with different relative positions of the S andN atoms, leading to the excellent ORR performance observed for the dual-doped N-S-G catalysts.
Heteroatom-doped 3D carbon nanostructures
Carbon nanomaterials with unique 3D ordered porous nanostructures of a controllable pore diameter andconfiguration, good mechanicalandchemical stability, high graphitization degree, and high surface area have attracted a great deal of interest for a wide range of applications, including gas adsorbents, catalyst supports, and electrodes in supercapacitors (, –). Heteroatom-doped 3D porous carbons have been synthesized from various dopant-containing precursors by using ordered mesoporoussilica as a hard template. For example, Liu et al. () have used ordered mesoporoussilicaSBA-15 as a template and a nitrogen-containing aromatic dyestuff, N,N′-bis(2,6-diisopropyphenyl)-3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic diimide (PDI), as the carbon precursor to synthesize 3D N-doped mesoporouscarbon with a high ORR electrocatalytic activity, excellent long-term stability, andgood resistance to crossover effects. Owing to the metal-free preparation procedure, the observed electrocatalytic activity can be exclusively attributed to the incorporation of nitrogen in the mesoporouscarbon. By usingSBA-15 mesoporoussilica with different channel lengths as templates, phosphorus-doped ordered mesoporouscarbons (POMCs) have also been synthesized from triphenylphosphineandphenol as phosphorusandcarbon sources, respectively (). The resultant POMCs of a low P doping level (less than 1.5 atomic %) acted as a metal-free electrode for ORR through a four-electron pathway in alkaline medium with an excellent electrocatalytic activity, along with an enhanced stability andalcohol tolerance with respect to platinum. It was found that POMCs with a shorter channel length (~0.7 μm) exhibited better electrocatalytic performance. In addition, N-doped 3D carbon nanocages, with a large specific surface area up to 1393 m2 g−1 and superior ORR stability to the commercialPt/C electrocatalyst in alkaline medium, were prepared through in situ synthesis from pyridine precursor within an MgO template ().Through in pan class="Chemical">situ polymerization of polyaniline within the pores of the SBA-15 template, N and O co-dopedmesoporouscarbons have also been synthesized recently (). The resultant 3D porous carbons showed good activities toward ORR because of the synergistic effect of the O and N co-doping. Similarly, the SBA-15 template was used to prepare S and N co-doped 3D carbon foams (S-N-CF) with controllable morphologies from sucroseandthiourea (). Compared to a commercialPt/Ccatalyst, the resultant S-N-CF exhibited a better catalytic activity, longer-term stability, and higher methanol tolerance, attributable to multiple synergistic effects intrinsically associated with the co-dopingand unique 3D architecture, including (i) numerous ORR catalyticsites from the high S and N heteroatom loadings, (ii) good reactant transports through the 3D pore structures, and (iii) efficient electron transfer along the 3D continuous carbon networks. In addition, N and S co-doped 3D carbon aerogels with distinct morphologies andcontrollable S-doping levels have been synthesized through hydrothermalcarbonization of S-(2-thienyl)-l-cysteine (TC) and2-thienyl carboxaldehyde (TCA), followed by thermal annealing to further modulate the conductivity and heteroatom binding states (). The N and S co-dopedcarbon aerogels showed an improved electrocatalytic activity with respect to the solely N-dopedcarbon aerogel, in both basicand acidic media. These results indicate that nanostructured carbon electrodes with 3D architectures of a large specific surface area can facilitate ion diffusion/charge transfer and are highly desirable for electrocatalysis.
Heteroatom-doped carbon electrocatalysts for ORR in acid media
As can be seen from the above discussions, most recent studies on the metal-free electrocatalysts based on heteroatom-dopedcarbon nanostructures have focused on the ORR reaction in alkaline electrolytes. However, fuel cells that operate with acidic electrolytes, particularly PEMFCs (), could have a more significant economic impact. Although many dopedcarbons have exhibited robust electrocatalytic activity toward ORR in alkaline electrolytes, their ORR activities are still inferior to platinumcatalysts under acidicconditions, probably because of the relatively few catalyticsites formed on the carbons (). Therefore, many recent efforts have been devoted to modulatingvarious physicochemicalcharacteristics of heteroatom-dopedcarbon nanomaterials, such as the carbon edge sites, doping amount, type of doping, surface area, and degree of sp2 bonding in the carbon matrix, to enhance their catalytic activities in acidic solutions. In this context, we have developed a simple plasma etching technology to effectively generate SiO2 nanoparticles as nonmetalcatalysts for efficient growth of N-dopedSWNTs by pyrolysis of CH4 under NH3 at 900°C (). Compared with undopedCNTs, the newly produced metal-free NCNTs showed relatively good electrocatalytic activity and long-term stability toward ORR in an acidic medium. In addition, a metal-free ordered mesoporouscarbon nitride (OMCN) has been prepared for ORR in an acidic medium to show significantly enhanced electrocatalytic activity compared to bulk carbon nitrideand ordered mesoporouscarbon in terms of both the current density and onset potential (). A high surface area and an increased density of catalytically active nitrogen groups in the OMCNcould concomitantly contribute to its enhanced performance. Furthermore, the OMCNalso exhibited a superior durability andmethanol tolerance to a Pt/Ccatalyst, suggesting its potential utilization as an electrocatalyst for PEMFCs.To inpan class="Chemical">crease the catalytic activity of N-dopedcarbons in acidic media, co-doping with additional dopants of B and/or P was also investigated (). It was noted that co-doping with B reinforced the sp2 structure of graphiteand increased the portion of pyridinic N sites in the carbon lattice, whereas P co-doping enhanced the charge delocalization of the carbon atomsand produced carbon structures with many edge sites. These co-doping–induced physicaland structuralalternations of the N-dopedcarbons are responsible for the enhanced ORR activity. Compared with N-dopedcarbon, B, N co-dopedand P, N co-dopedcarbons showed 1.2 and 2.1 times higher ORR activities, respectively, in acidic media. The ternary-dopedcarbon (B, P, N–dopedcarbon) exhibited the highest ORR catalytic activity, 2.3 times higher than that of its N-dopedcounterpart (). These results imply that the binary or ternary doping of B and P with N into carbon nanomaterials significantly enhanced the ORR performance, presumably owing to the improved charge delocalization of the carbon atomsand increased number of edge sites.
To inpan class="Chemical">crease the number of edge (depan class="Chemical">fect) sides, a new type of ORR electrocatalysts based on few-walled (two to three walls) CNTs andgraphene hybrids has been developed through a unique oxidation condition, in which abundant defects were introduced through partial unzipping of the outer nanotube walls to form large amounts of defect-rich nanoscale graphene sheets intimately attached to the intact inner walls of the CNTs (). The edge- and defect-rich graphene sheets facilitated the formation of catalyticsites on annealing in NH3 to show a high ORR activity and superb stability for ORR in acidic solutions. In this particular case, however, it is difficult to eliminate the effect of iron impurities originated from catalyst residues on nanotube growth because iron atomscould be found next to nitrogen atoms along the edges of the defective graphene sheets attached to the intact inner walls of few-walled nanotubes.
More recently, we have developn>ed a new class of carbon-based metal-free ORR catalysts that worked well in acid PEMFCs (). By mixingNG with acid-oxidized CNTs andcarbon black particles in solution, followed by freeze-drying, we obtained 3D porous carbon foams (N-G-CNT), in which N-graphene provided enormous surface area to speed ORR, nanotubes enhanced conductivity, andcarbon black separated the graphene sheets for free flow of the electrolyte andoxygen, which altogether greatly increased the ORR performance and efficiency of the N-G-CNT electrode. The cell performance of PEMFC at the N-G-CNT loading of 0.15, 0.5, or 2 mgcm−2 plus 2 mgcm−2 carbon black [Ketjenblack (KB)] is given in Fig. 7A, which shows a dramatic activity suppression for the cathode with high catalyst loadings (2 mgcm−2), as shown by the retardation in the activity increase with increasingcatalyst loading (Fig. 7A). Figure 7B shows a current of 30 A g−1 at 0.8 V, a limitingcurrent of 2000 A g−1 at 0.1 V, and a peak power density of 300 W g−1 for the N-G-CNT with carbon black (N-G-CNT/KB/Nafion = 0.5:2:2.5 mgcm−2), which are comparable to high-performance Fe(Co)/N/Ccatalysts (). In comparison with the Fe/N/C nonprecious metalcatalyst, N-G-CNT + KB (at both low and high loadings) showed a comparable capacity with a much better durability in PEMFCs operating at a constant voltage of 0.5 V with pure H2/O2 as fuel gas (Fig. 7C). Because carbon is more anticorrosive to acids than most transition metals, no significant acidiccorrosion was observed for the carbon electrode. As can be seen in Fig. 7C, N-G-CNT + KB exhibited an excellent stability with a relatively small current decay (~20% decay over 100 hours). In contrast, the Fe/N/Ccatalyst showed an initial sharp current decay with a total of about 75% decay over 100 hours at both the high (2 mgcm−2) and low loadings (0.5 mgcm−2) (). This work indicates that N-dopedcarbon nanomaterials are durable catalysts for ORR in acidic fuel cells (for example, PEMFCs), and opens possibilities for clean energy generation from affordable and durable PEMFCs based on low-cost, metal-free, carbon-based ORR catalysts.
Fig. 7
Power and durability performance of N-G-CNT with the addition of KB in PEM fuel cells.
(A) Polarization curves of N-G-CNT with loadings: 2, 0.5, or 0.15 mg cm−2 plus KB (2 mg cm−2) for each cathode. Weight ratio of (N-G-CNT/KB)/Nafion, 1:1. (B) Cell polarization and power density as a function of gravimetric current for N-G-CNT/KB (0.5/2 mg cm−2) with a 1:1 weight ratio of (N-G-CNT/KB)/Nafion. (C) Durability of the metal-free N-G-CNT in a PEM fuel cell measured at 0.5 V, compared with a Fe/N/C catalyst. Catalyst loading of N-G-CNT/KB (0.5 mg cm−2) and Fe/N/C (0.5 and 2 mg cm−2). Test conditions: H2/O2; 80°C; 100% relative humidity; back pressure, 2 bar. [From J. Shui, M. Wang, F. Du, L. Dai, N-doped carbon nanomaterials are durable catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in acidic fuel cells. Sci. Adv.
1, e1400129 (2015). Reprinted with permission from AAAS.]
Power and durability performance of N-G-CNT with the addition of KB in PEM fuel cells.
(A) Polarization curves of pan class="Chemical">N-G-CNT with loadings: 2, 0.5, or 0.15 mgcm−2 plus KB (2 mgcm−2) for each cathode. Weight ratio of (N-G-CNT/KB)/Nafion, 1:1. (B) Cell polarization and power density as a function of gravimetriccurrent for N-G-CNT/KB (0.5/2 mgcm−2) with a 1:1 weight ratio of (N-G-CNT/KB)/Nafion. (C) Durability of the metal-free N-G-CNT in a PEM fuel cell measured at 0.5 V, compared with a Fe/N/Ccatalyst. Catalyst loading of N-G-CNT/KB (0.5 mgcm−2) andFe/N/C (0.5 and 2 mgcm−2). Test conditions: H2/O2; 80°C; 100% relative humidity; back pressure, 2 bar. [From J. Shui, M. Wang, F. Du, L. Dai, N-dopedcarbon nanomaterials are durable catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in acidic fuel cells. Sci. Adv.
1, e1400129 (2015). Reprinted with permission from AAAS.]
HETEROATOM-DOPED CARBONS FOR METAL-AIR BATTERIES
pan class="Chemical">Metal-air battery is an electrochemical energy device in which a porous electrode allows the specificmetal to react directly with O2 from the air for electricity generation and storage. Because of the large theoretical specificcapacity of metal anode materials (for example, 3842 mAh g−1 for Li, 3816 mAh g−1 for Si, 2965 mAh g−1 for Al, 2204 mAh g−1 for Mg, and 815 mAh g−1 for Zn), metal-air batteries are attractingconsiderable attention nowadays (). Although different metalsand electrolytes are used, ORR and OER are involved in a variety of metal-air batteries during discharge andcharge processes, respectively. As such, catalysts play a major role in the electrochemical reduction of O2 in metal-air batteries with aqueous and nonaqueous media (, –), and hence, it is important to study ORR in metal-air cells.
Because of their high theoretipan class="Chemical">cal energy density, Li-air batteries, particularly those utilizing nonaqueous electrolytes with substantially high capacities, have been the main focus of recent research efforts (, ). However, the Zn-air battery technology is of particular interest because of its significantly lower cost and much better safety than its Li counterpart. In an aqueous Li-air battery, oxygen is reduced to hydroxyl ions (or hydroperoxide ions) during discharge to combine with Li ions from the anode into soluble LiOH. The overall reaction that occurs at the three-phase zone (Fig. 8A) in a Li-air battery is given in Eq. 5:
Fig. 8
Illustrated interfaces of air electrodes and proposed electrode structures.
(A) Gas-solid-liquid three-phase interface model in aqueous electrolytes. (B) Liquid-solid two-phase interface model in nonaqueous electrolytes. [From F. Cheng, J. Chen, Metal–air batteries: From oxygen reduction electrochemistry to cathode catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev.
41, 2172–2192 (2012). Reprinted with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.]
Illustrated interfaces of air electrodes and proposed electrode structures.
(A) Gas-solid-liquid three-phase interface model in aqueous electrolytes. (B) Liquid-solid two-phase interface model in nonaqueous electrolytes. [From F. Cheng, J. Chen, Metal–air batteries: From oxygen reduction electrochemistry to cathode catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev.
41, 2172–2192 (2012). Reprinted with permission from the RoyalSociety of Chemistry.]For a Zn-air battery, similar reactions occur at the air electrode, but Zinc ions from the anode can combine with hydroxyl ions to form zincate ions [Zn(OH)42−], which may decompose to produce ZnO:In a nonaqueous electrolyte, pan class="Chemical">O2 enters the porous cathode, is reduced, and then combines with the Li+ ions in the electrolyte to form solid Li2O2 (or Li2O) on discharge (Fig. 8B). The process is reversed on charging in the rechargeable batteries. Typically, the solid Li2O2 is insoluble and accumulates in the pores of the O2-breathingcathode:
To eliminate the effects of other constituents in air (for example, H2O, CO2, andN2), most studies of Li-air batteries have focused on examining battery performance with pure oxygen gas.
Carbon electrocatalysts for nonaqueous Li-air batteries
In 1996, Apan class="Chemical">braham pan class="Chemical">and Jiang () developed a nonaqueous thin film battery consisting of a thin Li metal foil anode, a thin solid polymer electrolyte, and a thin carboncomposite electrode. These authors found that the porous carbon electrode with a large surface area could efficiently reduce oxygen from the environment during discharge to generate a high specificcapacity of 1410 mAh g−1. Subsequently, various carbon materials, includingcarbon aerogel, porous carbon, CNT, andgraphene, have been investigated as porous cathodes in Li-O2 batteries (–). During the discharge process, the carbon skeleton acted as an electronically conductive pathway for ORR reaction, whereas the porous structure facilitated the oxygen diffusion to the carbon-electrolyte interface as well as the formation and accumulation of lithium oxides. During the charge process, the carbon skeleton promoted the electrochemical decomposition of lithium oxides. Therefore, the porous air electrode plays an important role in achieving high discharge capacity andcycling stability. Generally speaking, the specificcapacity of Li-air batteries depends strongly on the pore size, pore volume, andchemical structure of carbon materials (–). It is commonly believed that the discharge process is being terminated when the entire pore volume of the air electrode is filled with lithium oxides, which blocks the O2 intake. It has been found that only a fraction of the total pore volume (typically less than 50%) has been filled with the product at the end of discharge as micropores, and some of the mesopores would be blocked by lithium oxides formed through reduction of O2 at the beginning of discharge (, , ). In this context, Tran et al. () revealed that the capacity of a gas diffusion electrode (GDE) in a nonaqueous electrolyte depended almost linearly on the average pore diameter of the porous carbon electrode, leading to a quantitative estimation of the electrode capacity.
3D pan class="Chemical">carbon foam with bimodpan class="Chemical">al mesopores of narrow pore size distributions (~4.3 and 30.4 nm), prepared by using a mesocellular silica foam as the hard template, was demonstrated to show an approximately 40% higher discharge capacity in a Li-O2 battery than the commercialcarbon blacks (such as XC-72, Super P), as the ultra-large surface area of mesoporouscarbon with a large pore volume could allow a high uptake of lithium oxide during the discharge process (). Template-synthesized porous honeycomb-like carbon with hierarchical pores has also been used as an air electrode in Li-O2 batteries to yield a significantly higher specificcapacity of 3233 mAh g−1 and an improved cycle efficiency with a higher discharge voltage plateau (2.75 versus 2.50 V) than that of a conventionalcarbon electrode (). These results indicate that carbon with an optimal pore structure, a large surface area, and a high pore volume is a desirable air cathode for a high rate and large discharge capacity. Indeed, hierarchicalcarbon electrodes composed of highly aligned CNT fibrils with a well-defined pore structure, which renders good accessibility of oxygen to the inner electrode and a uniform deposition of discharge products on the individualCNTs, have been demonstrated to significantly enhance both the cycling stability and rate capability for Li-O2 batteries (). Similarly, NCNTs synthesized on nickel foams by a floatingcatalyst CVD method were shown to deliver a specificcapacity of 1814 mAh g−1 (normalized to the weight of the air electrode) in Li-O2 batteries. These 3D network structures could not only facilitate the O2 diffusion but also provide sufficient void volume for product deposition during a discharge process. The intimate contact between the NCNTs and the Ni current collector is an additional advantage for suppressing the volume expansion, leading to less polarization andgood cycling performance (). On the other hand, Zhangand Zhou () have designed, along with a conventional air electrode (Fig. 9A), a network gel consisting of SWNTsand ionic liquid [that is, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) ([C2C1im][NTf2])] as the oxygen electrode (Fig. 9, B andC) for a Li-O2 battery. The use of ionic liquid with excellent nonvolatility, high hydrophobicity, high thermal stability, and a broad electrochemical window, in conjunction with the 3D physically cross-linked SWNTs for efficient electron transfer and high uptake of discharge products (Fig. 9C), ensured an efficient tricontinuous pathway for electron, ion, andoxygentransfers (Fig. 9D), leading to a pronounced specific energy density and robust cycling stability without decomposition of the electrolyte ().
Fig. 9
Comparison of a conventional air electrode and a CNT/ionic liquid–based air electrode.
(A) Schematic illustration of a conventional air electrode. (B) Weight variation of the SWNT/[C2] salt and [C2C1im][NTf2] for 1 week. (C and D) Schematic illustration of the SWNT/[C2C1im][NTf2] CNG air electrode, in which SWNTs are untangled through π-π interaction with the imidazolium cation of [C2C1im] (green), whereas [NTf2] ions (purple) are anchored in the gel through electric neutrality (C) and the tricontinuous passage of electrons, ions, and oxygen in SWNT/[C2C1im][NTf2] CNG (D). Electrons conduct along the CNTs, whereas lithium ions transferred from the ionic liquid electrolyte outside into the cross-linked network gel become coordinated by the inside-anchored [NTf2] ion. Oxygen in the cross-linked network gel is incorporated with the lithium ions and electrons along the SWNTs, thereby turning into the discharge products. [From T. Zhang, H. Zhou, From Li–O2 to Li–air batteries: Carbon nanotubes/ionic liquid gels with a tricontinuous passage of electrons, ions, and oxygen. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
51, 11062–11067 (2012). Reprinted with permission from Wiley.]
Comparison of a conventional air electrode and a CNT/ionic liquid–based air electrode.
(A) Schematipan class="Chemical">c illustration of a conventional air electrode. (B) Weight variation of the SWNT/[C2] saltand [C2C1im][NTf2] for 1 week. (Cand D) Schematic illustration of the SWNT/[C2C1im][NTf2] CNG air electrode, in which SWNTs are untangled through π-π interaction with the imidazolium cation of [C2C1im] (green), whereas [NTf2] ions (purple) are anchored in the gel through electric neutrality (C) and the tricontinuous passage of electrons, ions, andoxygen in SWNT/[C2C1im][NTf2] CNG (D). Electrons conduct along the CNTs, whereas lithium ions transferred from the ionic liquid electrolyte outside into the cross-linked network gel become coordinated by the inside-anchored [NTf2] ion. Oxygen in the cross-linked network gel is incorporated with the lithium ions and electrons along the SWNTs, thereby turning into the discharge products. [From T. Zhang, H. Zhou, From Li–O2 to Li–air batteries: Carbon nanotubes/ionic liquid gels with a tricontinuous passage of electrons, ions, andoxygen. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
51, 11062–11067 (2012). Reprinted with permission from Wiley.]
In addition to the pan class="Gene">CNT-based air electrodes, graphene nanosheets (GNSs) have also been extensively studied as the cathode materials for Li-O2 batteries, showing an excellent electrochemical performance with a discharge capacity up to 8705.9 mAh g−1 (). Furthermore, higher average discharge plateau voltage andcharge capacity have been observed for the GNS electrode with respect to BP-2000 and Vulcan XC-72 electrodes. Although the detailed mechanism for ORR on GNSs in a nonaqueous electrolyte is still not fully understood, the GNSs are expected to form a 3D electrochemical interface with unique diffusion channels for the electrolyte andO2 to facilitate the catalytic reaction. In addition, the active sites at the graphene edge could also significantly enhance the ORR electrocatalytic activity (, ). In a similar but independent study, Xiao et al. () devised a novel air electrode consisting of a hierarchical arrangement of functionalized GNSs, demonstrating an exceptionally high capacity of 15,000 mAh g−1 in Li-O2 batteries. The observed excellent battery performance was attributed to a unique bimodal porous structure of the GNS electrode, in which microporous channels facilitated rapid O2 diffusion, whereas the highly connected pores provided a high density of reactive sites for lithium oxide reactions. In addition, defects and functional groups on the graphene sheet promoted the formation of isolated lithium oxide nanoparticles to prevent the air electrode from air blocking.
The efficient oxidization of solid pan class="Chemical">Li2O2 through OER during the charging process is highly desirable for rechargeable nonaqueous Li-O2 batteries. Modeling studies showed that bulk Li2O2 had both ionicand electronicconductivities () and that Li2O2could be effectively decomposed through self-oxidation. However, an in situ transmission electron microscopic study revealed that oxidation of electrochemically deposited Li2O2 particles supported on multiwalled CNTs (MCNTs) occurred preferentially at the MCNT/Li2O2 interface, which was relatively easy in the initial stage of charging, but became increasingly difficult for the vast majority of Li2O2 away from the electrode surface. The oxidation of Li2O2 is associated with severe polarization, as indicated by the inexorable increases in charging voltage (). This suggests that the oxidation kinetics at high rates are ultimately limited by the sluggish electron transport in Li2O2, leading to large overpotentials (). Under such high overpotentials, the stability of carbonand the possible effect of carbon on electrolyte decomposition are major concerns for the rechargeable nonaqueous Li-O2 battery. Ottakam Thotiyl andco-workers () revealed a potential-dependent carbon decomposition and electrolyte decomposition. It was further found that the decomposition of carbon to Li2CO3 only occurred on charging above 3.5 V (versus Li/Li+), whereas carbon promoted electrolyte (for example, dimethyl sulfoxideand tetraglyme electrolytes) decomposition to Li2CO3andLi carboxylates during discharge andcharge processes. Carbon with a hydrophobic surface was found to be less catalytically active toward electrolyte decomposition and, thus, more stable than its hydrophiliccounterpart. It is worth noting that only a small proportion of the totalcarbon decomposition duringcyclingcan be ascribed to the direct chemical reaction with Li2O2, whereas the accumulation of Li2CO3 on cycling often results in electrode passivation andcapacity fading.
These issues could be alleviated by using desirable electrodes with a large specific surface to maximize the Li2O2/electrode interfacial area and high electronicconductivity to facilitate electron transport to the reaction sites. To efficiently oxidize bulk Li2O2, a redox mediator has been incorporated into the electrolyte to enhance electron-hole transfer between the electrode andLi2O2 (). Recent studies have revealed that the application of catalysts, metal-based and/or metal-free heteroatom-dopedcarboncatalysts, could effectively decrease the recharge overpotential of a Li-O2 battery compared with pure carbon electrodes (–), as indicated by the N-dopedcarbon-based ORR/OER bifunctionalcatalyst (, , ). More specifically, we have recently developed vertically aligned N-dopedcoral-like carbon nanofiber (VA-NCCF) arrays with a large interfacial area andgood electronicconductivity by CVD as a binder-free ORR/OER bifunctional electrode for nonaqueous Li-O2 batteries (). The Li-O2 battery exhibited an energy efficiency as high as 90% and a narrow voltage gap of 0.3 V between discharge/charge plateaus. Because of the low overpotential of the VA-NCCF electrode, the electrolyte decomposition could be minimized. Excellent cycle ability, high specificcapacity (up to 1000 mAh g−1) per cycle, andgood reversibility were also demonstrated for the VA-NCCF electrode, attributable to its unique vertically aligned, coral-like N-dopedcarbon microstructure with a large surface area, high catalytic activity, and optimized oxygen/electron transportation capability. These results demonstrate that highly efficient and reversible Li-O2 batteries are feasible by using a rationally designed carbon-based oxygen electrode.
Carbon electrocatalysts for aqueous/hybrid Li-air batteries
For the aqueous Li-air battery, the presence of pan class="Chemical">water requires a protective layer on the Li anode to prevent lithium metal from reacting with water. An aqueous electrolyte is used at the cathode (air) side, which is separated from lithium metal by a solid-state electrolyte [a lithium super-ion conductor glass film (LISICON)]. The interface between lithiumand LISICON is filled with a thin buffer (electrolyte) polymer to prevent reduction of the solid electrolyte (, , , ). Figure 10 shows the typicalconfiguration of a hybrid Li-air battery, in which N-doped GNSs are used as an air electrode (). For the cathode side with aqueous electrolytes, the knowledge from conventional ORR catalysts may be straightforwardly applied. So far, however, only a few studies have been done on the use of carbon electrocatalysts in aqueous or hybrid Li-O2cells (). Owing to the presence of edge defect sites in GNSs, the metal-free GNS air electrodes in hybrid Li-air batteries showed a comparable and even superior discharge voltage to that of the 20 wt % Pt/C (). It was further found that proper thermal treatment of graphene sheets could enhance the catalytic activity toward ORR andalso improve the cycling stability. This is because the thermal treatment can remove adsorbed functional groupsand improve the graphitization degree of the GNS electrodes.
Fig. 10
Schematic representation of a hybrid Li-air battery.
The enlarged image shows the basic reaction process in the air electrode based on NG. [From E. Yoo, J. Nakamura, H. Zhou, N-Doped graphene nanosheets for Li–air fuel cells under acidic conditions. Energy Environ. Sci.
5, 6928–6932 (2012). Reprinted with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.]
Schematic representation of a hybrid Li-air battery.
The enlarged image shows the basin>an class="Chemical">c reaction process in the air electrode based on NG. [From E. Yoo, J. Nakamura, H. Zhou, N-Doped graphene nanosheets for Li–air fuel cells under acidicconditions. Energy Environ. Sci.
5, 6928–6932 (2012). Reprinted with permission from the RoyalSociety of Chemistry.]
Carbon electrocatalysts for Zn-air batteries
Due to its high theoreticn>an class="Chemical">al energy density, excellent safety, and a relatively low cost, Zn-air batteries may overtake the Li-air batteries in the race to the technological marketplace (). Similar reactions at the air electrodes are involved in both the Li-air andZn-air batteries, as shown in Eqs. 5 to 7.
The formation of soluble produpan class="Chemical">cts [for example, pan class="Chemical">Zn(OH)42−, compare Eq. 6] in a Zn-air battery could avoid cathode cloggingand volume expansion. Like in an aqueous or a hybrid Li-air battery, the porous air electrode is also attractive for a Zn-air battery (). As discussed earlier, various heteroatom-dopedcarbons have exhibited robust catalytic activities toward ORR, although only a few studies demonstrate their applications in a whole Zn-air battery (). As an example, NCNTs derived from ethylenediamine precursors were investigated as an air cathode catalyst in Zn-air batteries, which showed a high ORR activity with a cell power density of ~70 mW cm−2 at an air-cathode catalyst loading of 0.2 mgcm−2 in 6 M KOH (). Likewise, a Zn-air battery based on mesoporousand macroporous N-dopedcarbon fibers with a high surface area (1271 m2 g−1) exhibited a peak power density of 194 mW cm−2, comparable to its Pt/Ccounterpart (192 mWcm−2) ().
Bifunpan class="Chemical">ctionpan class="Chemical">al catalysts, which have the ability to catalyze both ORR and OER in aqueous media, are highly desirable for rechargeable Zn-air batteries. Noble metaland nonprecious metalcatalysts, such as metal oxides supported by carbon, have long been investigated in aqueous electrolytes as bifunctionalcatalysts to facilitate ORR and OER (–). In contrast, carbon-based metal-free bifunctionalcatalysts are a recent development (, , , ). Through polymerization of aniline in the presence of phytic acid to produce polyaniline (PANi) aerogels () and subsequent pyrolysis, we have recently produced 3D N and P co-dopedmesoporous nanocarbon (NPMC) foams that have a surface area of up to ~1663 m2 g−1 andgood electrocatalytic properties for both ORR and OER (). When used as air electrodes for primary batteries, the NPMC-based Zn-air batteries showed an open circuit potential of 1.48 V, a specificcapacity of 735 mAh gZn−1 (corresponding to an energy density of 835 Wh kgZn−1), and a peak power density of 55 mW cm−2, andcould sustain stable operation for 240 hours after mechanical recharging (). In addition, two-electrode rechargeable batteries based on the NPMC-1000 (pyrolysis temperature: 1000°C) air electrode could be stably cycled for 180 cycles at 2 mA cm−2 (Fig. 11A). Although NPMC-1000 accelerates both ORR and OER, a certain degree of irreversibility is unavoidable because of the different catalytic activities of the same catalyst toward ORR and OER reactions. Consequently, a deteriorating performance was observed for the two-electrode rechargeable Zn-air battery during a long-term cycling test. Therefore, to further improve the NPMC battery performance, we have also constructed a three-electrode rechargeable Zn-air battery (Fig. 11B), in which the NPMC bifunctionalcatalysts are prevented from beingcontacted with the oxidative (or reductive) potential during ORR (or OER), to study the electrocatalytic activities of the NPMC foam for both OER and ORR independently. In this case, the activities toward ORR and OER could be independently regulated by adjusting the catalyst mass loading on each of the two air electrodes, and a balanced reversible transfer between oxygen reduction and evolution was readily achieved. Figure 11C shows the discharge andcharge polarization curves for the three-electrode batteries with various air electrodes. The three-electrode rechargeable Zn-air battery usingNPMC-1000 as air electrodes showed no obvious voltage change over 600 discharge/charge cycles (for 100 hours, Fig. 11D), comparable to that of a three-electrode Zn-air battery using the state-of-the-art Pt/CandRuO2 as the ORR and OER catalysts, respectively (). The Zn-air battery based on the NPMC air electrodes is comparable to, or even better than, most of the recently reported rechargeable Zn-air batteries based on metal/metal oxide electrodes (, –). To gain insights into the ORR and OER catalytic mechanisms of the NPMCmetal-free bifunctionalcatalysts, we performed the first-principles calculations using the DFT methods to determine the electronic structures andcatalytic reactions for the N, P co-dopedcarbon structures. Our calculations revealed that the N, P co-dopingand the graphene edge effect are crucial for the bifunctional electrocatalytic activities of our NPMC materials ().
Fig. 11
Performance of rechargeable Zn-air batteries.
(A) Discharge/charge cycling curves of a two-electrode rechargeable Zn-air battery at a current density of 2 mA cm−2 using the NPMC-1000 (pyrolysis at 1000°C) air electrode. Three-electrode Zn-air batteries. (B) Schematic illustration for the basic configuration of a three-electrode Zn-air battery by coupling a Zn electrode with two air electrodes to separate ORR and OER. The enlarged parts illustrate the porous structures of the air electrodes, which facilitates the gas exchange. (C) Charge and discharge polarization curves of three-electrode Zn-air batteries using the NPMC-1000, NPMC-1100, or commercial Pt/C catalyst as both of the air electrodes, along with the corresponding curve (that is, Pt/C + RuO2) for the three-electrode Zn-air battery with Pt/C and RuO2 nanoparticles as each of the air electrodes, respectively. (D) Discharge/charge cycling curves of a three-electrode Zn-air battery using NPMC-1000 as air electrodes (0.5 mg cm−2 for ORR and 1.5 mg cm−2 for OER) at a current density of 2 mA cm−2. [From J. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Z. Xia, L. Dai, A metal-free bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions. Nat. Nanotechnol.
10, 444–452 (2015). Reprinted with permission from the Nature Publishing Group.]
Performance of rechargeable Zn-air batteries.
(A) Discharge/charge cyclingcurves of a two-electrode rechargeable Zn-air battery at a current density of 2 mA cm−2 using the NPMC-1000 (pyrolysis at 1000°C) air electrode. Three-electrode Zn-air batteries. (B) Schematic illustration for the basicconfiguration of a three-electrode Zn-air battery by coupling a Zn electrode with two air electrodes to separate ORR and OER. The enlarged parts illustrate the porous structures of the air electrodes, which facilitates the gas exchange. (C) Charge and discharge polarization curves of three-electrode Zn-air batteries using the NPMC-1000, NPMC-1100, or commercialPt/Ccatalyst as both of the air electrodes, along with the correspondingcurve (that is, Pt/C + RuO2) for the three-electrode Zn-air battery with Pt/CandRuO2 nanoparticles as each of the air electrodes, respectively. (D) Discharge/charge cyclingcurves of a three-electrode Zn-air battery usingNPMC-1000 as air electrodes (0.5 mgcm−2 for ORR and 1.5 mgcm−2 for OER) at a current density of 2 mA cm−2. [From J. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Z. Xia, L. Dai, A metal-free bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction andoxygen evolution reactions. Nat. Nanotechnol.
10, 444–452 (2015). Reprinted with permission from the Nature Publishing Group.]More generpan class="Chemical">ally, it is pan class="Chemical">critical to establish design principles or descriptors for heteroatom-dopedcarbon nanomaterials based on computational modeling. It has been shown that in ORR and OER, surface-oxygen bond energy is closely related to the charge densities on graphene around dopants because the reaction intermediates (*OH, *O, *OOH, where the asterisk indicates a bond to the surface) interact with the surface through an O atom. Thus, electrochemical quantities, such as 4e− pathway selectivity and onset potential, should relate well to the binding strength of intrinsicoxygen-containing intermediates (adsorbed species) on the catalyst surface. To derive the minimum overpotential (corresponding to the highest activity) in doped graphene systems, the overpotentials were calculated for different reaction sites on different structures using the adsorption energy difference between *O and *OH for OER and adsorption energy of *OH for ORR, following the approaches outlined by Nørskov et al. (, ) andMan et al. (). When a descriptor is identified, the catalytic rates typically have a “volcano”-shaped dependence on the descriptor with a maximum at the optimum value of this descriptor. Various material structures have been calculated, includingNG quantum dots (); NG ribbons (); N, S, O, B single-doped graphene (); and P, N co-doped graphene (). Through these calculations, key descriptors were identified for both ORR and OER on these catalysts, showing that the free energy difference between *OH and *OOH has a linear relationship over all the sites. It is worth noting that OER and ORR with the minimum overpotentials can occur near the edge on the same graphitic structure but different sites. Therefore, as mentioned earlier, the combined experimentaland theoretical approach should facilitate the design and development of metal-free, carbon-based catalysts with controlled locations and structures of the active centers, and hence tailor-made electrocatalytic activities for energy conversion and storage in fuel cells, metal-air batteries, andmany other energy-related devices/systems.
As can be seen from the preceding discussion, a variety of heteroatom-dopedcarbons with a large surface area, good electricalconductivity, and tunable pore structure have been rationally designed and fabricated for various promising applications. Porous carbons with hierarchical porosities can facilitate oxygen/electrolyte/electron transports and enhance solid oxide deposition in metal-air batteries during the discharging process. Therefore, in addition to the demonstration of high ORR catalytic activities for carbon nanostructures, the recent development of ORR and OER bifunctional nanocarboncatalysts is important to the metal-air rechargeable battery technology. With carbon nanomaterials of various heteroatom-doped multidimensional architectures as the air cathode for ORR/OER, high-performance Li-air andZn-air primary and rechargeable batteries have been developed. Despite these recent advancements, in-depth theoreticaland experimental studies are needed to understand the bifunctional electrocatalytic mechanisms of these novel electrocatalysts, which should facilitate the development of multifunctionalcarbon nanomaterials for other electrocatalytic applications as well.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The importance of developn>ipan class="Chemical">ng renewable energy technologies has been evident from the fact that global energy consumption, along with “greenhouse” gas emission, has been accelerating at an alarming rate. Fuel cells andmetal-air batteries are among the most efficient and environmentally benign energy conversion and storage technologies to meet the demand for alternative energy sources. However, noble metal (for example, platinum) and/or metal oxidecatalysts are required to catalyze the key chemical reactions, including ORR and OER, in fuel cells andmetal-air batteries. The high cost, low selectivity, poor durability, and detrimental environmental effects intrinsically associated with most of the metal-based catalysts have been shown to be the major “showstopper” to mass-market fuel cells or metal-air batteries for commercial applications. Along with the intensive research efforts in reducing or replacing (noble) metal-based catalysts, a new class of metal-free ORR catalysts based on carbon nanomaterials doped with heteroatom(s) has been recently discovered. With rapid advances in carbon nanomaterials and nanotechnology, various heteroatom-dopedcarbon nanostructures, includingCNTs, grapheneand derivatives, and 3D porous carbon foams, have been successfully developed as low-cost, highly efficient, metal-free electrocatalysts for ORR and OER in fuel cells andmetal-air batteries.
In fuel cells, various metal-free ORR catalysts based on heteroatom-dopedcarbon nanomaterials have been demonstrated to exhibit a high electrocatalytic activity, a good tolerance to fuel crossover/CO poisoning effect, and an excellent operation durability comparable to or even better than that of the best nonprecious metalcatalysts, opening avenues for clean energy generation from affordable and durable fuel cells (for example, PEMFCs). On the other hand, a variety of metal-free porous carbons have been investigated as air electrodes in nonaqueous Li-air batteries. Porous carbons with hierarchical porosities could ensure an efficient oxygen/electrolyte transport, a high uptake of the solid lithium oxide produced in the discharging process, and a good electricconductivity for fast electron conduction. Bifunctionalcatalysts are essential for the development of rechargeable batteries. Very recently, metal-free, carbon-based ORR and OER bifunctional electrocatalysts have been developed as efficient air electrodes for primary and rechargeable Zn-air batteries, showing a high specificcapacity, good cycling rate capability, and long operation stability.Despite the great supan class="Chemical">ccess that has been achieved in the design and development of various heteroatom-doped, metal-free carbon-based electrocatalysts for ORR and OER, they still suffer from some inherent drawbacks, including the low concentration of heteroatom dopants, relatively poor catalytic performance in acidic media, and difficulties in controlling the exact locations and structures of active sites. Although it is still a challenge to experimentally study the active sites, the first-principles approach has been used as an alternative and powerful tool to study the catalytic mechanism of heteroatom-dopedcarbon nanomaterials as efficient catalysts for ORR in fuel cells and OER in metal-air batteries. The theoretical investigations complement state-of-the-art experimental techniques, especially in cases where experimentalcharacterization of a variety of intermediates is difficult or impossible. The electronic structures, active sites, reaction pathways, and energy barriers have been studied using DFT methods. To rationally design a catalyst, however, it is critical to understand which intrinsic materialcharacteristics (or descriptors) control catalysis. Continued research with the combined experimentaland theoretical approach should lead to the development of highly efficient carbon-based catalysts for fuel cells andmetal-air batteries in a time- andcost-savingmanner, which will affect every aspect of our daily life in the near future.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To demonstrate the evpan class="Chemical">aluation methods of electrocatalytic activity toward ORR by using RDE and RRDE (Fig. 1, A and B), the commercially available Pt/Ccatalyst (C2-20, 20% platinum on Vulcan XC-72R; E-TEK) was used as an electrocatalyst for ORR and measured in 0.1 M KOH. The electrochemical performance was characterized in a three-electrode configuration with the RDE or RRDE. The potential, measured against an Ag/AgCl electrode, was converted to potential versus RHE according to Evs RHE = Evs Ag/AgCl + Eø Ag/AgCl + 0.059 pH. To prepare the working electrode, 5 mg of Pt/Ccatalyst was dispersed in an aqueous solution containing 0.95 ml of deionizedwaterand 0.05 ml of 5 wt % Nafion under sonication. The obtained homogeneous catalyst ink (6 μl) was dropped onto a mirror-polished glassy carbon electrode to achieve a mass loading of 0.15 mgcm−2. A 0.1 M KOH aqueous solution saturated with oxygen was used as the electrolyte.
Authors: Venkateshkumar Prabhakaran; Grant E Johnson; Bingbing Wang; Julia Laskin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Shahbaz Khan; Mohammad Alkhedher; Rizwan Raza; Muhammad Ashfaq Ahmad; Abdul Majid; ElSayed M Tag El Din Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 4.967
Authors: N Bundaleska; J Henriques; M Abrashev; A M Botelho do Rego; A M Ferraria; A Almeida; F M Dias; E Valcheva; B Arnaudov; K K Upadhyay; M F Montemor; E Tatarova Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 4.379