| Literature DB >> 26601203 |
Hannah C Barkley1, Anne L Cohen2, Yimnang Golbuu3, Victoria R Starczak2, Thomas M DeCarlo1, Kathryn E F Shamberger2.
Abstract
Ocean acidification threatens the survival of coral reef ecosystems worldwide. The negative effects of ocean acidification observed in many laboratory experiments have been seen in studies of naturally low-pH reefs, with little evidence to date for adaptation. Recently, we reported initial data suggesting that low-pH coral communities of the Palau Rock Islands appear healthy despite the extreme conditions in which they live. Here, we build on that observation with a comprehensive statistical analysis of benthic communities across Palau's natural acidification gradient. Our analysis revealed a shift in coral community composition but no impact of acidification on coral richness, coralline algae abundance, macroalgae cover, coral calcification, or skeletal density. However, coral bioerosion increased 11-fold as pH decreased from the barrier reefs to the Rock Island bays. Indeed, a comparison of the naturally low-pH coral reef systems studied so far revealed increased bioerosion to be the only consistent feature among them, as responses varied across other indices of ecosystem health. Our results imply that whereas community responses may vary, escalation of coral reef bioerosion and acceleration of a shift from net accreting to net eroding reef structures will likely be a global signature of ocean acidification.Entities:
Keywords: bioerosion; calcification; community composition; coral reef; ocean acidification
Year: 2015 PMID: 26601203 PMCID: PMC4640615 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Natural acidification gradient across Palau mirrors projected anthropogenic CO2-driven changes in ocean chemistry.
Shown are the mean (±1 SD) dawn-to-dusk pH and Ωar for our 11 reef study sites and diurnal pH variability at three of those sites over 4 days (inset) (fig. S1: sites 1, 2, and 10). Shaded regions indicate the range of western tropical Pacific open ocean pH and Ωar levels in 2000 (blue) and open ocean values predicted for 2050 (orange) and 2100 (red) (, ). Colored points correspond to pH time series in inset.
Fig. 2Palau coral reef community responses to acidification.
(A) Mean (±1 SE) percent coral cover per transect (n = 5 per site) from 2010 to 2012 (circles) versus site mean Ωar (±1 SD) with pre-1998 bleaching barrier coral cover () and estimated Ωar () from 1992 to 1994 (red circle). (B) Number of coral genera observed (richness). (C and D) Macroalgae (C) and crustose coralline algae (CCA) (D). (E and F) Percent cover of Porites spp. (E) and Acropora spp. (F).
Fig. 3Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) scores for eight Palauan reef sites and coral genera.
DCA scores are for each of five transects collected per reef site (circles, colored by mean Ωar for each site) and their coral genera (names abbreviated). See table S6 for genus abbreviations.
Fig. 4Skeletal growth responses of two coral genera to acidification.
(A to H) Skeletal analyses include 2006–2010 site mean (±1 SE) extension (ext.), density (den.), and calcification rates (calc.) for Porites (A, C, and E) and Favia (B, D, and F); percent Porites skeletal volume macrobioeroded (G) versus Ωar (±1 SD); and the relationship between Porites density and skeletal volume macrobioeroded (H).
Diverse reef responses to natural acidification in the Palau Rock Islands, PNG CO2 vents, Mexico ojos, and eastern tropical Pacific (ETP) upwelling regions.
For each site, response variables are reported as the ratio of each variable in low/high pH sites. + indicates a significant increase in the response variable from high to low pH, and − indicates a significant decrease. n.d., no data available.
| Hard coral cover | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 (−) | 0.0 (−) |
| Macroalgae cover | 0.7 | 2.1 (+) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Coralline algae cover | 1.1 | 0.2 (−) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Hard coral richness | 1.6 | 0.6 (−) | 0.3 (−) | 0.2 (−) |
| 16.0 (+) | 2.3 (+) | 0.8 | n.d. | |
| 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | |
| 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 (−) | 0.8 (−) | |
| 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.7 (−) | 0.5 (−) | |
| Bioerosion¶ | 11.3 (+) | 1.9 (+) | 1.8 (+) | 1.9 (+) |
*For Palau, ratios are calculated for the two lowest and the two highest Ωar reefs, and the indicated significance is for the trend across all sites (Ωar = 3.7 to 2.3).
†For PNG, ratios and trends are reported for Ωar = 3.5 to 2.9 ().
‡Community data for Mexico are reported for Ωar > 2.5 to Ωar < 2.5 (), and skeletal growth parameters are reported for Ωar > 2 to Ωar < 2 ().
§For the ETP, hard coral cover, hard coral richness, and Porites extension, density, and calcification data are reported for four reef sites within the Galapagos (Ωar = 3.3 to 2.4) (). Porites macrobioerosion rates are compared across the Galapagos, the Gulf of Panama, and Gulf of Chiriquí (Ωar = 3.5 to 2.5) ().
¶Trends in bioerosion are estimated by the percent volume of macrobioerosion of Porites skeletal cores (Palau and Mexico), Porites bioeroder density (PNG), or bioerosion rate (ETP).