Literature DB >> 26600935

Colorectal cancer screening in an academic center compared to the national average.

Manuel O Gonzalez1, Lilly M Sadri1, Alfred B Leong1, Smruti R Mohanty1, Parag Mehta1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate if the increased emphases on training and education on current colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines has resulted in improved national CRC screening rates in an internal medicine training program, and to determine if the doctor's post graduate year (PGY) level of training affected CRC screening rates.
METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional study of every patient who presented to the outpatient clinic of New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, over the span of six continuous weeks in 2011. A questionnaire was integrated into every patient's medical interview that helped determine that patient's current CRC screening status, screening mammography status if applicable, Papanicolaou smear status if applicable, and current pneumococcal vaccination status. At the same time, patient demographics were also obtained. All of the questionnaire data was collected at the end of each medical visit and was compiled by a designated researcher. After all the data points were collected, it was ensured that the patient has been seen by his or her continuity care resident at least twice in the past. Data was then compiled into a secure, encrypted database to then be analyzed by our statistician.
RESULTS: Data from 547 consecutive clinic visits were obtained. Of these, we reviewed 483 charts that met all of the inclusion criteria and did not meet the exclusion criteria. The data was then analyzed for differences between PGY levels, patient's sex, race, and educational level. The study population consisted of 138 men and 345 women. 35 patients were white (7.40%), 174 were black (39.79%) and 264 were Hispanic (55.81%). Our CRC screening rates were: 66% for PGY-1's, 72% for PGY-2's and 77% for PGY-3's. There was no statistical difference noted between the three groups (P ≤ 0.05) or was there any difference sex, insurance status or educational level. Overall CRC screening rate was 72% which was not different from the New York State average (P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant higher rate of CRC screening amongst Hispanics 76% (P = 0.034) and in people within the ages of 70-79, 82% (P = 0.015).
CONCLUSION: Patients that are followed by internal medicine residents at our urban outpatient teaching clinic did not receive higher rates of CRC screening nor did rates of screening vary with their PGY level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Post graduate year; Residency; Screening; Urban

Year:  2015        PMID: 26600935      PMCID: PMC4644858          DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i11.356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol


  10 in total

1.  Survey of internal medicine residents' use of the fecal occult blood test and their understanding of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  V K Sharma; F A Corder; J P Raufman; P Sharma; M B Fennerty; C W Howden
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Differences in preventive health quality by residency year. Is seniority better?

Authors:  Lisa L Willett; Katri Palonen; Jeroan J Allison; Gustavo R Heudebert; Catarina I Kiefe; F Stanford Massie; Terry C Wall; Thomas K Houston
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: inadequate knowledge by physicians.

Authors:  Melissa Gennarelli; Lina Jandorf; Caroline Cromwell; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; William Redd; Steven Itzkowitz
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  2005-01

4.  Medical residents' colorectal cancer screening may be dependent on ambulatory care education.

Authors:  M L Borum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Performance on preventive cancer screening tests in the ambulatory setting by internal medicine resident physicians.

Authors:  Perry G An; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Blair W Fosburgh; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.414

6.  Health care providers' perspectives of an intervention designed to improve colorectal cancer screening rates in family medicine residency clinics : a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sara Rowe; Geoffrey Goldsmith; Robert Price; Audrey Brooks; Amanda Harvey
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Colorectal cancer screening compliance by medicine residents: perceived and actual.

Authors:  D L Zack; J K DiBaise; E M Quigley; H K Roy
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Kimberly S Andrews; Durado Brooks; John Bond; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M Giardiello; Seth Glick; David Johnson; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; Perry J Pickhardt; Douglas K Rex; Robert A Smith; Alan Thorson; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Colorectal cancer screening and familial risk: a survey of internal medicine residents' knowledge and practice patterns.

Authors:  Adam F Barrison; Christopher Smith; Jaime Oviedo; Timothy Heeren; Paul C Schroy
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  The utility of an evidence-based lecture and clinical prompt as methods to improve quality of care in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Kenneth A Seres; Angelia C Kirkpatrick; William M Tierney
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 10.864

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.