David S Liebeskind1. 1. Neurovascular Imaging Research Core, University of California, Los Angeles, and Comprehensive Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif., USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Precision medicine in cerebrovascular disorders may be greatly advanced by the use of innovative interventional and imaging-intensive registries. Registries have remained subsidiary to randomized controlled trials, yet vast opportunities exist to leverage big data in stroke. SUMMARY: This overview builds upon the rationale for innovative, imaging-intensive interventional registries as a pivotal step in realizing precision medicine for several cerebrovascular disorders. Such enhanced registries may serve as a model for expansion of our translational research pipeline to fully leverage the role of phase IV investigations. The scope and role of registries in precision medicine are considered, followed by a review on the history of stroke and interventional registries, data considerations, critiques or barriers to such initiatives, and the potential modernization of registry methods into efficient, searchable, imaging-intensive resources that simultaneously offer clinical, research and educational added value. KEY MESSAGES: Recent advances in technology, informatics and endovascular stroke therapies converge to provide an exceptional opportunity for registries to catapult further progress. There is now a tremendous opportunity to deploy registries in acute stroke, intracranial atherosclerotic disease and carotid disease where other clinical trials leave questions unanswered. Unlike prior registries, imaging-intensive and modernized methods may leverage current technological capabilities around the world to efficiently address key objectives and provide added clinical, research and educational value.
BACKGROUND: Precision medicine in cerebrovascular disorders may be greatly advanced by the use of innovative interventional and imaging-intensive registries. Registries have remained subsidiary to randomized controlled trials, yet vast opportunities exist to leverage big data in stroke. SUMMARY: This overview builds upon the rationale for innovative, imaging-intensive interventional registries as a pivotal step in realizing precision medicine for several cerebrovascular disorders. Such enhanced registries may serve as a model for expansion of our translational research pipeline to fully leverage the role of phase IV investigations. The scope and role of registries in precision medicine are considered, followed by a review on the history of stroke and interventional registries, data considerations, critiques or barriers to such initiatives, and the potential modernization of registry methods into efficient, searchable, imaging-intensive resources that simultaneously offer clinical, research and educational added value. KEY MESSAGES: Recent advances in technology, informatics and endovascular stroke therapies converge to provide an exceptional opportunity for registries to catapult further progress. There is now a tremendous opportunity to deploy registries in acute stroke, intracranial atherosclerotic disease and carotid disease where other clinical trials leave questions unanswered. Unlike prior registries, imaging-intensive and modernized methods may leverage current technological capabilities around the world to efficiently address key objectives and provide added clinical, research and educational value.
Authors: Carlos A Molina; Angel Chamorro; Àlex Rovira; Angeles de Miquel; Joaquin Serena; Luis San Roman; Tudor G Jovin; Antoni Davalos; Erik Cobo Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2013-11-10 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Paul A Scuffham; Jane Nikles; Geoffrey K Mitchell; Michael J Yelland; Norma Vine; Christopher J Poulos; Peter I Pillans; Guy Bashford; Chris del Mar; Philip J Schluter; Paul Glasziou Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Oliver C Singer; Joachim Berkefeld; Christian H Nolte; Georg Bohner; Arno Reich; Martin Wiesmann; Klaus Groeschel; Stephan Boor; Tobias Neumann-Haefelin; Erich Hofmann; Anett Stoll; Albrecht Bormann; David S Liebeskind Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-01-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David S Liebeskind; Thomas A Tomsick; Lydia D Foster; Sharon D Yeatts; Janice Carrozzella; Andrew M Demchuk; Tudor G Jovin; Pooja Khatri; Ruediger von Kummer; Rebecca M Sugg; Osama O Zaidat; Syed I Hussain; Mayank Goyal; Bijoy K Menon; Firas Al Ali; Bernard Yan; Yuko Y Palesch; Joseph P Broderick Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Sunil A Sheth; Bryan Yoo; Jeffrey L Saver; Sidney Starkman; Latisha K Ali; Doojin Kim; Nestor R Gonzalez; Reza Jahan; Satoshi Tateshima; Gary Duckwiler; Fernando Vinuela; David S Liebeskind Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: David S Liebeskind; Jason D Hinman; Naoki Kaneko; Hiroaki Kitajima; Tristan Honda; Adam H De Havenon; Edward Feldmann; Raul G Nogueira; Shyam Prabhakaran; Jose G Romano; Peter W Callas; David J Schneider Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 4.003