Literature DB >> 26600096

Flushing the liver with urokinase before transplantation does not prevent nonanastomotic biliary strictures.

Lars C Pietersen1,2, A Claire den Dulk3, Andries E Braat1, Hein Putter4, Kerem Sebib Korkmaz3, Andre G Baranski1, Alexander F M Schaapherder1, Jeroen Dubbeld1, Bart van Hoek3, Jan Ringers1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess whether flushing the donor liver with urokinase immediately before implantation reduces the incidence of nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NASs) after liver transplantation, without causing increased blood loss, analyzed as a historical cohort study. Between January 2005 and October 2012, all liver (re-)transplantations were included. Of the 185 liver transplant recipients included, 63 donor livers between January 2010 and October 2012 received urokinase (study group), whereas the donor liver of 122 consecutive recipients, who served as a historical control group, between January 2005 and January 2010 did not receive urokinase. Basic donor (Eurotransplant donor risk index) and recipient (age, body mass index, laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score) characteristics did not significantly differ in both groups. Thirty-three recipients developed NASs: 22 in the control group (18%) and 11 (17.5%) in the study group (P = 0.68). Analyzed separately for donation after circulatory death (P = 0.42) or donation after brain death (P = 0.89), there was no difference between the groups in incidence of NAS. Of all the recipients developing NAS, 7 (21%) needed retransplantation and all others were treated conservatively. Autologous blood transfusion requirements did not differ significantly between both groups (P = 0.91), whereas interestingly, more heterologous blood transfusions were needed in the control group (P < 0.001). This study has its limitations by its retrospective character. A multi-institutional prospective study could clarify this issue. In conclusion, arterial flushing of the liver with urokinase immediately before implantation did not lead to a lower incidence of NAS in this study, nor did it lead to increased blood loss.
© 2015 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26600096     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  4 in total

Review 1.  Addressing organ shortages: progress in donation after circulatory death for liver transplantation

Authors:  Jordan J. Nostedt; James Shapiro; Darren H. Freed; David L. Bigam
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Donation after circulatory death liver transplantation: consensus statements from the Spanish Liver Transplantation Society.

Authors:  Amelia J Hessheimer; Mikel Gastaca; Eduardo Miñambres; Jordi Colmenero; Constantino Fondevila
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 3.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Thrombolytic Therapy in Liver Transplantation Following Donation after Circulatory Death.

Authors:  Kumar Jayant; Isabella Reccia; Francesco Virdis; A M James Shapiro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Thrombolytic Therapy During ex-vivo Normothermic Machine Perfusion of Human Livers Reduces Peribiliary Vascular Plexus Injury.

Authors:  Omar Haque; Siavash Raigani; Ivy Rosales; Cailah Carroll; Taylor M Coe; Sofia Baptista; Heidi Yeh; Korkut Uygun; Francis L Delmonico; James F Markmann
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-06-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.