Monika Tasani1, Steven Y C Tong, Ross M Andrews, Deborah C Holt, Bart J Currie, Jonathan R Carapetis, Asha C Bowen. 1. From the *Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; †Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Australia; ‡Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia; §Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; and ¶Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Skin infections account for a high disease burden in indigenous children living in northern Australia. Although the relationship between impetigo and scabies is recognized, the prevalence of scabies in children with impetigo is not well reported. We report the prevalence, demographics and treatment success outcomes of impetigo and scabies coinfection in indigenous children who were participants in a randomized controlled trial of impetigo treatment conducted in remote communities of the Northern Territory, Australia. METHODS: Of 1715 screening episodes for impetigo, 508 children were randomized to receive intramuscular benzathine benzylpenicillin (BPG), twice daily co-trimoxazole (SXT) for 3 days (4 mg/kg trimethoprim plus 20 mg/kg sulfamethoxazole per dose) or once daily SXT for 5 days (8 mg/kg trimethoprim plus 40 mg/kg sulfamethoxazole per dose). A clinical diagnosis of scabies; tinea of the skin, scalp or nail; and head lice was made on all children. Scabies presence was not confirmed using diagnostic scrapings. In a post-hoc analysis, we determined whether coinfection with scabies had an impact on treatment success for impetigo. RESULTS: Of children randomized to receive treatment for impetigo, 84 of 508 (16.5%) had scabies. The presence of scabies ranged from 14.3% to 20.0% in the 3 treatment groups. Treatment success for impetigo with and without scabies coinfection, independent of the treatment groups, was 75.9% and 86.6%, respectively, absolute difference 10.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): +1% to +21%]. Treatment success for impetigo with and without scabies coinfection in the BPG group was 69.6% and 88.0%, respectively, absolute difference 18.4% (95% CI: -1% to +38%). In the pooled SXT groups, the treatment success for impetigo with and without scabies coinfection was 78.6% and 86.0%, respectively, with absolute difference 7.4% (95% CI: -4% to +18%). Treatment success in the pooled SXT group with scabies (78.6%) was higher than in the BPG group (69.6%) with scabies, absolute difference 9.0% (95% CI: +0.1% to +18%). Prediction of treatment success for impetigo is dependent on the presence or absence of scabies and for scabies coinfected impetigo it was higher in the group treated with SXT. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of scabies in an impetigo trial for Indigenous children was high. Treatment success for scabies coinfection was lower than for impetigo overall, with a higher success seen in the SXT group than the BPG group.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Skin infections account for a high disease burden in indigenous children living in northern Australia. Although the relationship between impetigo and scabies is recognized, the prevalence of scabies in children with impetigo is not well reported. We report the prevalence, demographics and treatment success outcomes of impetigo and scabies coinfection in indigenous children who were participants in a randomized controlled trial of impetigo treatment conducted in remote communities of the Northern Territory, Australia. METHODS: Of 1715 screening episodes for impetigo, 508 children were randomized to receive intramuscular benzathine benzylpenicillin (BPG), twice daily co-trimoxazole (SXT) for 3 days (4 mg/kg trimethoprim plus 20 mg/kg sulfamethoxazole per dose) or once daily SXT for 5 days (8 mg/kg trimethoprim plus 40 mg/kg sulfamethoxazole per dose). A clinical diagnosis of scabies; tinea of the skin, scalp or nail; and head lice was made on all children. Scabies presence was not confirmed using diagnostic scrapings. In a post-hoc analysis, we determined whether coinfection with scabies had an impact on treatment success for impetigo. RESULTS: Of children randomized to receive treatment for impetigo, 84 of 508 (16.5%) had scabies. The presence of scabies ranged from 14.3% to 20.0% in the 3 treatment groups. Treatment success for impetigo with and without scabies coinfection, independent of the treatment groups, was 75.9% and 86.6%, respectively, absolute difference 10.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): +1% to +21%]. Treatment success for impetigo with and without scabies coinfection in the BPG group was 69.6% and 88.0%, respectively, absolute difference 18.4% (95% CI: -1% to +38%). In the pooled SXT groups, the treatment success for impetigo with and without scabies coinfection was 78.6% and 86.0%, respectively, with absolute difference 7.4% (95% CI: -4% to +18%). Treatment success in the pooled SXT group with scabies (78.6%) was higher than in the BPG group (69.6%) with scabies, absolute difference 9.0% (95% CI: +0.1% to +18%). Prediction of treatment success for impetigo is dependent on the presence or absence of scabies and for scabies coinfected impetigo it was higher in the group treated with SXT. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of scabies in an impetigo trial for Indigenous children was high. Treatment success for scabies coinfection was lower than for impetigo overall, with a higher success seen in the SXT group than the BPG group.
Authors: Thiripura Vino; Gurmeet R Singh; Belinda Davison; Patricia T Campbell; Michael J Lydeamore; Andrew Robinson; Jodie McVernon; Steven Y C Tong; Nicholas Geard Journal: PeerJ Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Naomi van der Linden; Kees van Gool; Karen Gardner; Helen Dickinson; Jason Agostino; David G Regan; Michelle Dowden; Rosalie Viney Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2019-03-08
Authors: Michael G Baker; Jason Gurney; Jane Oliver; Nicole J Moreland; Deborah A Williamson; Nevil Pierse; Nigel Wilson; Tony R Merriman; Teuila Percival; Colleen Murray; Catherine Jackson; Richard Edwards; Lyndie Foster Page; Florina Chan Mow; Angela Chong; Barry Gribben; Diana Lennon Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Andrew J Prendergast; Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi; Peter Mugyenyi; Joseph Lutaakome; Adeodata Kekitiinwa; Margaret J Thomason; Diana M Gibb; A Sarah Walker Journal: AIDS Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Pasi K Korhonen; Robin B Gasser; Guangxu Ma; Tao Wang; Andreas J Stroehlein; Neil D Young; Ching-Seng Ang; Deepani D Fernando; Hieng C Lu; Sara Taylor; Simone L Reynolds; Ehtesham Mofiz; Shivashankar H Najaraj; Harsha Gowda; Anil Madugundu; Santosh Renuse; Deborah Holt; Akhilesh Pandey; Anthony T Papenfuss; Katja Fischer Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2020-10-01
Authors: Susanna J Lake; Sophie L Phelan; Daniel Engelman; Oliver Sokana; Titus Nasi; Dickson Boara; Christina Gorae; Tibor Schuster; Anneke C Grobler; Millicent H Osti; Ross Andrews; Michael Marks; Margot J Whitfeld; Lucia Romani; John Kaldor; Andrew Steer Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-08-30 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Susanna J Lake; Daniel Engelman; Oliver Sokana; Titus Nasi; Dickson Boara; Anneke C Grobler; Millicent H Osti; Ross Andrews; Michael Marks; Margot J Whitfeld; Lucia Romani; John M Kaldor; Andrew C Steer Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2021-02-22
Authors: George Taiaroa; Ben Matalavea; Malama Tafuna'i; Jake A Lacey; David J Price; Lupeoletalalelei Isaia; Hinauri Leaupepe; Satupaitea Viali; Darren Lee; Claire L Gorrie; Deborah A Williamson; Susan Jack Journal: Lancet Reg Health West Pac Date: 2020-12-29