Literature DB >> 26599393

New Constraints on Terrestrial Surface-Atmosphere Fluxes of Gaseous Elemental Mercury Using a Global Database.

Yannick Agnan1, Théo Le Dantec2,3, Christopher W Moore1, Grant C Edwards4, Daniel Obrist1.   

Abstract

Despite 30 years of study, gaseous elemental mercury (Hg(0)) exchange magnitude and controls between terrestrial surfaces and the atmosphere still remain uncertain. We compiled data from 132 studies, including 1290 reported fluxes from more than 200,000 individual measurements, into a database to statistically examine flux magnitudes and controls. We found that fluxes were unevenly distributed, both spatially and temporally, with strong biases toward Hg-enriched sites, daytime and summertime measurements. Fluxes at Hg-enriched sites were positively correlated with substrate concentrations, but this was absent at background sites. Median fluxes over litter- and snow-covered soils were lower than over bare soils, and chamber measurements showed higher emission compared to micrometeorological measurements. Due to low spatial extent, estimated emissions from Hg-enriched areas (217 Mg·a(-1)) were lower than previous estimates. Globally, areas with enhanced atmospheric Hg(0) levels (particularly East Asia) showed an emerging importance of Hg(0) emissions accounting for half of the total global emissions estimated at 607 Mg·a(-1), although with a large uncertainty range (-513 to 1353 Mg·a(-1) [range of 37.5th and 62.5th percentiles]). The largest uncertainties in Hg(0) fluxes stem from forests (-513 to 1353 Mg·a(-1) [range of 37.5th and 62.5th percentiles]), largely driven by a shortage of whole-ecosystem fluxes and uncertain contributions of leaf-atmosphere exchanges, questioning to what degree ecosystems are net sinks or sources of atmospheric Hg(0).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26599393     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

1.  Tundra uptake of atmospheric elemental mercury drives Arctic mercury pollution.

Authors:  Daniel Obrist; Yannick Agnan; Martin Jiskra; Christine L Olson; Dominique P Colegrove; Jacques Hueber; Christopher W Moore; Jeroen E Sonke; Detlev Helmig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Development of a High-Resolution Laser Absorption Spectroscopy Method with Application to the Determination of Absolute Concentration of Gaseous Elemental Mercury in Air.

Authors:  Abneesh Srivastava; Joseph T Hodges
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Comparison of Primary Laser Spectroscopy and Mass Spectrometry Methods for Measuring Mass Concentration of Gaseous Elemental Mercury.

Authors:  Abneesh Srivastava; Stephen E Long; James E Norris; Colleen E Bryan; Jennifer Carney; Joseph T Hodges
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Surface-air mercury fluxes and a watershed mass balance in forested and harvested catchments.

Authors:  Chris S Eckley; Collin Eagles-Smith; Michael T Tate; David P Krabbenhoft
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 9.988

5.  Mercury Reduction by Nanoparticulate Vivianite.

Authors:  Marjorie Etique; Sylvain Bouchet; James M Byrne; Laurel K ThomasArrigo; Ralf Kaegi; Ruben Kretzschmar
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use.

Authors:  Daniel Obrist; Jane L Kirk; Lei Zhang; Elsie M Sunderland; Martin Jiskra; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Mercury evasion from a boreal peatland shortens the timeline for recovery from legacy pollution.

Authors:  Stefan Osterwalder; Kevin Bishop; Christine Alewell; Johannes Fritsche; Hjalmar Laudon; Staffan Åkerblom; Mats B Nilsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Potential impacts of mercury released from thawing permafrost.

Authors:  Kevin Schaefer; Yasin Elshorbany; Elchin Jafarov; Paul F Schuster; Robert G Striegl; Kimberly P Wickland; Elsie M Sunderland
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Previously unaccounted atmospheric mercury deposition in a midlatitude deciduous forest.

Authors:  Daniel Obrist; Eric M Roy; Jamie L Harrison; Charlotte F Kwong; J William Munger; Hans Moosmüller; Christ D Romero; Shiwei Sun; Jun Zhou; Róisín Commane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.