Literature DB >> 26598641

Dynamics of Hippocampal Protein Expression During Long-term Spatial Memory Formation.

Natalia Borovok1, Elimelech Nesher2, Yishai Levin3, Michal Reichenstein1, Albert Pinhasov2, Izhak Michaelevski4.   

Abstract

Spatial memory depends on the hippocampus, which is particularly vulnerable to aging. This vulnerability has implications for the impairment of navigation capacities in older people, who may show a marked drop in performance of spatial tasks with advancing age. Contemporary understanding of long-term memory formation relies on molecular mechanisms underlying long-term synaptic plasticity. With memory acquisition, activity-dependent changes occurring in synapses initiate multiple signal transduction pathways enhancing protein turnover. This enhancement facilitates de novo synthesis of plasticity related proteins, crucial factors for establishing persistent long-term synaptic plasticity and forming memory engrams. Extensive studies have been performed to elucidate molecular mechanisms of memory traces formation; however, the identity of plasticity related proteins is still evasive. In this study, we investigated protein turnover in mouse hippocampus during long-term spatial memory formation using the reference memory version of radial arm maze (RAM) paradigm. We identified 1592 proteins, which exhibited a complex picture of expression changes during spatial memory formation. Variable linear decomposition reduced significantly data dimensionality and enriched three principal factors responsible for variance of memory-related protein levels at (1) the initial phase of memory acquisition (165 proteins), (2) during the steep learning improvement (148 proteins), and (3) the final phase of the learning curve (123 proteins). Gene ontology and signaling pathways analysis revealed a clear correlation between memory improvement and learning phase-curbed expression profiles of proteins belonging to specific functional categories. We found differential enrichment of (1) neurotrophic factors signaling pathways, proteins regulating synaptic transmission, and actin microfilament during the first day of the learning curve; (2) transcription and translation machinery, protein trafficking, enhancement of metabolic activity, and Wnt signaling pathway during the steep phase of memory formation; and (3) cytoskeleton organization proteins. Taken together, this study clearly demonstrates dynamic assembly and disassembly of protein-protein interaction networks depending on the stage of memory formation engrams.
© 2016 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26598641      PMCID: PMC4739671          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M115.051318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  134 in total

1.  Internalization of ionotropic glutamate receptors in response to mGluR activation.

Authors:  E M Snyder; B D Philpot; K M Huber; X Dong; J R Fallon; M F Bear
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The ubiquitin-proteasome cascade is required for mammalian long-term memory formation.

Authors:  M Lopez-Salon; M Alonso; M R Vianna; H Viola; T Mello e Souza; I Izquierdo; J M Pasquini; J H Medina
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Associative memory formation increases the observation of dendritic spines in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Benedetta Leuner; Jacqueline Falduto; Tracey J Shors
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches.

Authors:  Robert C Malenka; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  The hemo-neural hypothesis: on the role of blood flow in information processing.

Authors:  Christopher I Moore; Rosa Cao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Signaling to transcription networks in the neuronal retrograde injury response.

Authors:  Izhak Michaelevski; Yael Segal-Ruder; Meir Rozenbaum; Katalin F Medzihradszky; Ophir Shalem; Giovanni Coppola; Shirley Horn-Saban; Keren Ben-Yaakov; Shachar Y Dagan; Ida Rishal; Daniel H Geschwind; Yitzhak Pilpel; Alma L Burlingame; Mike Fainzilber
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 8.192

7.  The enhancement of stress-related memory by glucocorticoids depends on synapsin-Ia/Ib.

Authors:  J-M Revest; N Kaouane; M Mondin; A Le Roux; F Rougé-Pont; M Vallée; J Barik; F Tronche; A Desmedt; P V Piazza
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 15.992

8.  Synapsin-I- and synapsin-II-null mice display an increased age-dependent cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Anna Corradi; Alessio Zanardi; Caterina Giacomini; Franco Onofri; Flavia Valtorta; Michele Zoli; Fabio Benfenati
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 9.  Transcriptional regulation of long-term memory in the marine snail Aplysia.

Authors:  Yong-Seok Lee; Craig H Bailey; Eric R Kandel; Bong-Kiun Kaang
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 4.041

10.  GIANT: a cytoscape plugin for modular networks.

Authors:  Fabio Cumbo; Paola Paci; Daniele Santoni; Luisa Di Paola; Alessandro Giuliani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Neuroproteomics: How Many Angels can be Identified in an Extract from the Head of a Pin?

Authors:  Jeffery L Twiss; Mike Fainzilber
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Abelson Kinases Mediate the Depression of Spontaneous Synaptic Activity Induced by Amyloid Beta 1-42 Peptides.

Authors:  M Reichenstein; N Borovok; A Sheinin; T Brider; I Michaelevski
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.046

Review 3.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches to Understand the Molecular Basis of Memory.

Authors:  Arthur H Pontes; Marcelo V de Sousa
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.221

4.  Cell-specific non-canonical amino acid labelling identifies changes in the de novo proteome during memory formation.

Authors:  Harrison Tudor Evans; Liviu-Gabriel Bodea; Jürgen Götz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.