Literature DB >> 26598141

Safety of human immunisation with a live-attenuated Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccine: a randomised, double-blind, controlled phase I trial.

François Spertini1, Régine Audran2, Reza Chakour2, Olfa Karoui2, Viviane Steiner-Monard2, Anne-Christine Thierry2, Carole E Mayor2, Nils Rettby3, Katia Jaton4, Laure Vallotton5, Catherine Lazor-Blanchet6, Juana Doce7, Eugenia Puentes7, Dessislava Marinova8, Nacho Aguilo8, Carlos Martin9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis remains one of the world's deadliest transmissible diseases despite widespread use of the BCG vaccine. MTBVAC is a new live tuberculosis vaccine based on genetically attenuated Mycobacterium tuberculosis that expresses most antigens present in human isolates of M tuberculosis. We aimed to compare the safety of MTBVAC with BCG in healthy adult volunteers.
METHODS: We did this single-centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled phase 1 study at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV; Lausanne, Switzerland). Volunteers were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 18-45 years, clinically healthy, HIV-negative and tuberculosis-negative, and had no history of active tuberculosis, chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis, or BCG vaccination. Volunteers fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to three cohorts in a dose-escalation manner. Randomisation was done centrally by the CHUV Pharmacy and treatments were masked from the study team and volunteers. As participants were recruited within each cohort, they were randomly assigned 3:1 to receive MTBVAC or BCG. Of the participants allocated MTBVAC, those in the first cohort received 5 × 10(3) colony forming units (CFU) MTBVAC, those in the second cohort received 5 × 10(4) CFU MTBVAC, and those in the third cohort received 5 × 10(5) CFU MTBVAC. In all cohorts, participants assigned to receive BCG were given 5 × 10(5) CFU BCG. Each participant received a single intradermal injection of their assigned vaccine in 0·1 mL sterile water in their non-dominant arm. The primary outcome was safety in all vaccinated participants. Secondary outcomes included whole blood cell-mediated immune response to live MTBVAC and BCG, and interferon γ release assays (IGRA) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02013245.
FINDINGS: Between Jan 23, 2013, and Nov 6, 2013, we enrolled 36 volunteers into three cohorts, each of which consisted of nine participants who received MTBVAC and three who received BCG. 34 volunteers completed the trial. The safety of vaccination with MTBVAC at all doses was similar to that of BCG, and vaccination did not induce any serious adverse events. All individuals were IGRA negative at the end of follow-up (day 210). After whole blood stimulation with live MTBVAC or BCG, MTBVAC was at least as immunogenic as BCG. At the same dose as BCG (5×10(5) CFU), although no statistical significance could be achieved, there were more responders in the MTBVAC group than in the BCG group, with a greater frequency of polyfunctional CD4+ central memory T cells.
INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, MTBVAC is the first live-attenuated M tuberculosis vaccine to reach clinical assessment, showing similar safety to BCG. MTBVAC seemed to be at least as immunogenic as BCG, but the study was not powered to investigate this outcome. Further plans to use more immunogenicity endpoints in a larger number of volunteers (adults and adolescents) are underway, with the aim to thoroughly characterise and potentially distinguish immunogenicity between MTBVAC and BCG in tuberculosis-endemic countries. Combined with an excellent safety profile, these data support advanced clinical development in high-burden tuberculosis endemic countries. FUNDING: Biofabri and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through the TuBerculosis Vaccine Initiative (TBVI).
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26598141     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00435-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Respir Med        ISSN: 2213-2600            Impact factor:   30.700


  58 in total

1.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis sigE mutant ST28 used as a vaccine induces protective immunity in the guinea pig model.

Authors:  JoLynn Troudt; Elizabeth Creissen; Linda Izzo; Helle Bielefeldt-Ohmann; Stefano Casonato; Riccardo Manganelli; Angelo A Izzo
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.131

2.  The BCG Strain Pool: Diversity Matters.

Authors:  Daria Bottai; Roland Brosch
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  Translational Research in the Nonhuman Primate Model of Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Taylor W Foreman; Smriti Mehra; Andrew A Lackner; Deepak Kaushal
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2017-12-01

Review 4.  The current status, challenges, and future developments of new tuberculosis vaccines.

Authors:  Wenping Gong; Yan Liang; Xueqiong Wu
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Tuberculosis Vaccine Development: Progress in Clinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Suraj B Sable; James E Posey; Thomas J Scriba
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Moving tuberculosis vaccines from theory to practice.

Authors:  Peter Andersen; Thomas J Scriba
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 53.106

7.  Validation of a CD1b tetramer assay for studies of human mycobacterial infection or vaccination.

Authors:  Erik D Layton; Krystle K Q Yu; Malisa T Smith; Thomas J Scriba; Stephen C De Rosa; Chetan Seshadri
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 8.  Research and development of new tuberculosis vaccines: a review.

Authors:  Lewis K Schrager; Rebecca C Harris; Johan Vekemans
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-11-01

Review 9.  A review of the BCG vaccine and other approaches toward tuberculosis eradication.

Authors:  Thomas Cho; Christopher Khatchadourian; Huy Nguyen; Yash Dara; Shuna Jung; Vishwanath Venketaraman
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  CD1b Tetramers Identify T Cells that Recognize Natural and Synthetic Diacylated Sulfoglycolipids from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Charlotte A James; Krystle K Q Yu; Martine Gilleron; Jacques Prandi; Vijayendar R Yedulla; Zuzanna Z Moleda; Eleonora Diamanti; Momin Khan; Varinder K Aggarwal; Josephine F Reijneveld; Peter Reinink; Stefanie Lenz; Ryan O Emerson; Thomas J Scriba; Michael N T Souter; Dale I Godfrey; Daniel G Pellicci; D Branch Moody; Adriaan J Minnaard; Chetan Seshadri; Ildiko Van Rhijn
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 8.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.