Literature DB >> 26598099

Principles in the Evaluation of Systematic Reviews.

Stacy L Haber1, Kathleen A Fairman1, David Alexander Sclar1.   

Abstract

Literature reviews summarize information from individual studies and are an important tool in the practice of evidence-based medicine. Various types of reviews, including narrative and systematic reviews, may be found within the biomedical literature. Systematic reviews are the strongest type and are often rated as the highest level of evidence. Thus it is important that clinicians understand how to evaluate them critically. This article is intended to enhance clinicians' understanding of the unique methods commonly used in systematic reviews by using the reporting standards to formulate evaluation principles. Explanations of the statistical tests and types of biases that are frequently encountered in systematic reviews are discussed. Lastly, an evaluation of a meta-analysis using these principles is provided.
© 2015 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Keywords:  literature evaluation; meta-analysis; review; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26598099     DOI: 10.1002/phar.1657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  2 in total

1.  Prevalence and Nature of Medication Errors and Medication-Related Harm Following Discharge from Hospital to Community Settings: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fatema A Alqenae; Douglas Steinke; Richard N Keers
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Response Comment on "Challenges and the Path Forward on Malaria Elimination Intervention: A Systematic Review".

Authors:  Khandan Shahandeh; Hamid Reza Basseri
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.429

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.