PURPOSE: There is a growing public health concern related to the rapid increase in the use of multiple tobacco products among adolescents. This study examined patterns of adolescent use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars/cigarillo, hookah/waterpipe, and smokeless/dip/chewing tobacco in a population of southern California adolescents. METHODS: Data from 2,097 11th- and 12th-grade participants in the Southern California Children's Health Study were collected via self-report in 2014. Study participants were asked about lifetime and current (past 30 days) use of cigarettes, cigars/cigarillos/little cigars, e-cigarettes, hookah/waterpipe, and smokeless/dip/chewing tobacco. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify patterns of tobacco use. RESULTS: Hookah/waterpipe tobacco use had the highest current prevalence (10.7%) followed by e-cigarettes (9.6%). The prevalence of use of smokeless/dip/chewing tobacco was lowest, with 2.2% of adolescents reporting current use. The LCA suggested four distinct classes, comprising nonusers (72.3% of the sample), polytobacco experimenters (13.9%), e-cigarette/hookah users (8.2%), and polytobacco users (5.6%). Multinomial logistic regression based on these four classes found that males had double the odds to be polytobacco users relative to nonusers compared to females (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-4.25). CONCLUSIONS: By identifying naturally occurring configurations of tobacco product use in teens, these findings may be useful to practitioners and policymakers to identify the need for tobacco control interventions that address specific tobacco products and particular combinations of polytobacco use. LCA can be used to identify segments of the population overrepresented among certain tobacco use classes (e.g., boys) that may benefit most from targeted polyproduct intervention approaches.
PURPOSE: There is a growing public health concern related to the rapid increase in the use of multiple tobacco products among adolescents. This study examined patterns of adolescent use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars/cigarillo, hookah/waterpipe, and smokeless/dip/chewing tobacco in a population of southern California adolescents. METHODS: Data from 2,097 11th- and 12th-grade participants in the Southern California Children's Health Study were collected via self-report in 2014. Study participants were asked about lifetime and current (past 30 days) use of cigarettes, cigars/cigarillos/little cigars, e-cigarettes, hookah/waterpipe, and smokeless/dip/chewing tobacco. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify patterns of tobacco use. RESULTS: Hookah/waterpipe tobacco use had the highest current prevalence (10.7%) followed by e-cigarettes (9.6%). The prevalence of use of smokeless/dip/chewing tobacco was lowest, with 2.2% of adolescents reporting current use. The LCA suggested four distinct classes, comprising nonusers (72.3% of the sample), polytobacco experimenters (13.9%), e-cigarette/hookah users (8.2%), and polytobacco users (5.6%). Multinomial logistic regression based on these four classes found that males had double the odds to be polytobacco users relative to nonusers compared to females (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-4.25). CONCLUSIONS: By identifying naturally occurring configurations of tobacco product use in teens, these findings may be useful to practitioners and policymakers to identify the need for tobacco control interventions that address specific tobacco products and particular combinations of polytobacco use. LCA can be used to identify segments of the population overrepresented among certain tobacco use classes (e.g., boys) that may benefit most from targeted polyproduct intervention approaches.
Authors: Joshua R Smith; Thomas E Novotny; Steven D Edland; C Richard Hofstetter; Suzanne P Lindsay; Wael K Al-Delaimy Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-03-31 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jennifer M Cameron; Donelle N Howell; John R White; David M Andrenyak; Matthew E Layton; John M Roll Journal: Tob Control Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Kiros Berhane; Jennifer B Unger; Tess Boley Cruz; Jimi Huh; Adam M Leventhal; Robert Urman; Kejia Wang; Steve Howland; Tamika D Gilreath; Chih-Ping Chou; Mary Ann Pentz; Rob McConnell Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Rob McConnell; Kiros Berhane; Ling Yao; Michael Jerrett; Fred Lurmann; Frank Gilliland; Nino Künzli; Jim Gauderman; Ed Avol; Duncan Thomas; John Peters Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Kathryn C Edwards; Karin A Kasza; Zhiqun Tang; Cassandra A Stanton; Eva Sharma; Michael J Halenar; Kristie A Taylor; Elisabeth A Donaldson; Lynn C Hull; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Jean Limpert; Izabella Zandberg; Lisa D Gardner; Nicolette Borek; Heather L Kimmel; Wilson M Compton; Andrew Hyland Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Patricia Simon; Deepa R Camenga; Grace Kong; Christian M Connell; Meghan E Morean; Dana A Cavallo; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2017-01-01
Authors: Catherine Ann Hess; Pablo Olmedo; Ana Navas-Acien; Walter Goessler; Joanna E Cohen; Ana Maria Rule Journal: Environ Res Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Michael J Zvolensky; Lorra Garey; Nubia A Mayorga; Andrew H Rogers; Michael F Orr; Joseph W Ditre; Natalia Peraza Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2018-11-28
Authors: Daniela Golinelli; Daniel Siconolfi; William G Shadel; Rachana Seelam; Joan S Tucker Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Grace Kong; MeLisa R Creamer; Patricia Simon; Dana A Cavallo; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Josephine T Hinds; Howard Fishbein; Kevin Gutierrez Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-05-04 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Cheryl L Perry; MeLisa R Creamer; Benjamin W Chaffee; Jennifer B Unger; Erin L Sutfin; Grace Kong; Ce Shang; Stephanie L Clendennen; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Mary Ann Pentz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.244