| Literature DB >> 26597909 |
Maryam Hafizi1,2, Atena Hajarizadeh3, Amir Atashi4, Somayeh Kalanaky5, Saideh Fakharzadeh6, Zahra Masoumi7, Mohammad Hassan Nazaran8, Masoud Soleimani9.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) have been approved for therapeutic applications. Despite the advances in this field, in vitro approaches are still required to improve the essential indices that would pave the way to a bright horizon for an efficient transplantation in the future. Nanotechnology could help to improve these approaches. Studies signified the important role of iron in stem cell metabolism and efficiency of copper chelation application for stem cell expansionEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26597909 PMCID: PMC4657224 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-015-0216-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Fig. 1Design and time line of the study
Primers for qRT-PCR genes
| Genes | Primer sequences | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ALP | FW, 5′- GCA CCT GCC TTA CTA ACT C −3′; |
| RW, 5′- AGA CAC CCA TCC CAT CTC −3′; | ||
| 2 | COL1 | FW, 5′- TGG AGC AAG AGG CGA GAG −3′; |
| RW, 5′- CAC CAG CAT CAC CCT TAG C −3′; | ||
| 3 | CXCR4 | FW, 5-′ CGC CAC CAA CAG TCA GAG −3′ ; |
| RW, 5′- AAC ACA ACC ACC CAC AAG TC −3′; | ||
| 4 | GAPDH | FW, 5′- GACAAGCTTCCCGTTCTCAG-3′; |
| RW, 5′- GAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGT-3′; | ||
| 5 | H-P53 | FW, 5′- GGA GTA TTT GGA TGA CAG AAA C −3′; |
| RW, 5′- GAT TAC CAC TGG AGT CTT C −3′; | ||
| 6 | LERP | FW, 5′- CAA TCT GAA TGA AAC CAA ACC TC −3′; |
| RW, GGC TGC TCC TAT GAT ACC TC −3′; | ||
| 7 | REX1 | FW, 5′- CGG GAC GAG GAG TGT TAT TAC −3′; |
| RW, 5′- CGT GTT GCT TTG CGA CTT G −3′; | ||
| 8 | RUNX2 | FW, 5′- GCC TTC AAG GTG GTA GCC C −3′; |
| RW, 5′- CGT TAC CCG CCA TGA CAG TA −3′ | ||
| 9 | Lipoprotein lipase | FW, 5′- CCC TAC AAA GTC TTC CAT TAC −3′; |
| RW, 5′- AGT TCT CCA ATA TCT ACC TCT G −3′; | ||
| 10 | NRF2 | FW, 5′- GCG ACG GAA AGA GTA TGA G −3′; |
| RW, 5′- GGG CAA CCT GGG AGT AG −3′; | ||
| 11 | NANOG | FW, 5′- GCT AAG GAC AAC ATT GAT AGA AG −3′; |
| RW, 5′- CTT CAT CAC CAA TTC GTA CTT G −3′; | ||
| 12 | Osteonectin | FW: 5′: CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACACATATAC-3′, |
| RW: 5′- ACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTC-3′. | ||
| 13 | Osteocalcin | FW, 5-′ GCA AAG GTG CAG CCT TTG TG −3′ ; |
| RW, 5′- GGC TCC CAG CCA TTG ATA CAG −3′; | ||
| 14 | OCT-4 | FW, 5′- CGC CGT ATG AGT TCT GTG −3′; |
| RW, 5′- GGT GAT CCT CTT CTG CTT C −3′; | ||
| 15 | SOX2 | FW; 5′- GGA CTG AGA GAA AGA AGA GGA G −3′ |
| RW, 5′- GAA AAT CAG GCG AAG AAT AAT-3′; | ||
| 16 | SOD1 | FW, 5′- CGA GCA GAA GGA AAG TAA TG −3′; |
| RW, 5′- TGG ATA GAG GAT TAA AGT GAG G −3′; |
Fig. 2a SEM image of Fe-chelate nanosphere (the faces of the Fe-chelate nanospheres are smooth). b SEM image of the growth progression of Cu-chelator polymerized on the surface of Fe-chelate nanosphere, bar = 20 nm; c IR spectrum. SEM scanning electron microscopy, IR infrared
Fig. 3a Cells expressed hMSc markers. The cells were negative for CD34, CD45, and CD 117 but were positive for CD 73, CD90, and CD105. b The ability for lipogenic differentiation was assessed by staining with Oil Red. c The ability for osteogenesis differentiation was assessed by staining with Alizarin (400 X magnification). hMSc mesenchymal stem cell.
Fig. 4a The MTT Cell Proliferation Assay. b FACS analysis of cell cycle parameters. c Cell viability assays by flow cytometry. (data shown with dot plot diagram). (Isotype control is an antibody of the same isotype as a primary antibody with no relevant specificity to the target antigen and it used as negative controls to help differentiate non-specific background signal from specific antibody signal). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Asterisks show significant differences with p < 0.05. hMSCs human mesenchymal stem cells, PI propidium iodide
Fig. 5a Relative expression level of pluripotency genes (NONOG, SOX2, OCT-4, and REX1) on day 7 of the test compared with control. b Relative expression level of pluripotency genes (NONOG, SOX2, OCT-4, and REX1) on day 14 of the test compared with control. c Relative expression levels of pluripotency genes (NONOG, SOX2, OCT-4, and REX1) in the two groups (test and control) were compared with the cells obtained on the isolation day. d Flow cytometric analysis of Oct-4 expression. The red horizontal line shows the one-fold enrichment cut off criteria. Data are expressed as mean ± SD; Asterisks show significant differences with p < 0.05
Fig. 6a Effect of GFc7 nanocomplex on spontaneous differentiation, relative expression of osteogenic differentiation genes (OCN, ON, ALP, COLI, and RUNX2) in control and test groups were compared to the cells obtained on the isolation day. b Effect of GFc7 on spontaneous differentiation on ALP activity of hMSCs in the control and test groups compared to the cells obtained on the isolation day. c Effect of GFc7 on spontaneous differentiation on calcium content of hMSCs in the control and test groups compared to the cells obtained on the isolation day. The red horizontal line shows the one-fold enrichment cut off criteria. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Asterisks show significant differences with p < 0.05. OCN osteocalcin, ON osteonectin, ALP alkaline phosphatase
Percent of CD markers between groups
| CD marker | Control | Test |
|---|---|---|
| CD73 | 70 % | 91 % |
| CD90 | 93 % | 96 % |
| CD105 | 92 % | 99.5 % |
| CD 106 | Negative | 19 % |
| CD34 | Negative | Negative |
| CD44 | Negative | Negative |
| CD166 | Negative | Negative |
| HLADR | Negative | 2 % |
Percent of mean fluorescence intensity
| GMean | Control | Test |
|---|---|---|
| CD73 | 16 % | 27 % |
| CD90 | 37 % | 22 % |
| CD105 | 26 % | 23 % |
| CD 106 | Negative | 11 % |
| CD34 | Negative | Negative |
| CD44 | Negative | Negative |
| CD166 | Negative | Negative |
| HLADR | Negative | Negative |
Fig. 7a hMSCs protection from H2O2-induced oxidative toxicity by GFc7nono complex. b Relative expression of antioxidant gene (Nrf2, SOD) in test group compared to the control after exposure to H2O2. c Relative expression of antioxidant gene (Nrf2, SOD) in test and control groups after exposure to H2O2 compared to the cells obtained on the isolation day. The red horizontal line shows the one-fold enrichment cutoff criteria. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Asterisks show significant differences with p < 0.05. Nrf2 nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2, SOD superoxide dismutases
Fig. 8a Relative expression of CXCR-4 for test compared with control. b Flow cytometric analysis of CXCR-4 expression protein. The red horizontal line shows the one-fold enrichment cutoff criteria. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Asterisks show significant differences with p < 0.05. The dark filled histogram represents the isotype control; the color line histogram represents expression of CXCR4 on hMSCs. CXCR-4 C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4
Fig. 9a The ability for adipogenesis differentiation was assessed by staining with Oil Red O for lipid accumulation (400 X magnification). b Relative expression of lipogenic-specific genes (LERP, LPA) in test compared with control. The red horizontal line shows the one-fold enrichment cutoff criteria. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Asterisks show significant differences with p < 0.05. LPA lysophosphatidic acid
Fig. 10a The ability for osteogenesis differentiation was assessed by staining with Alizarin Red for calcium deposition (400 X magnification). b Relative expression of osteogenic-specific genes (OCN, ON, ALP, COLI, and RUNX2) for test group on days 7 and 14 compared with control. c ALP activity of hMSCs in the control and test groups during osteogenic differentiation (day 5 and 10). d Calcium content of hMSCs in the control and test groups during osteogenic differentiation (day 5 and 10). The red horizontal line shows the one-fold enrichment cut off criteria. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Asterisks show significant differences with p < 0.05