R Bendavid1,2, W Lou3, D Grischkan4, A Koch5, K Petersen6, J Morrison7, V Iakovlev8,9. 1. Shouldice Hospital, 7750 Bayview Avenue, Thornhill, ON, L3T 4A3, Canada. rbendavid@sympatico.ca. 2. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. rbendavid@sympatico.ca. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Dalla Lan School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 4. Ohio Hernia Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. Day Surgery and Hernia Center, Gerhard-Hauptman Str. 15, Cottbus, Germany. 6. , Las Vegas, NV, USA. 7. Chatham Kent Health Alliance, Chatham, ON, Canada. 8. Division of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 9. St Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective is to compare nerve densities in explanted polypropylene meshes in patients with or without chronic pain. Pain has supplanted recurrences as a complication of hernia surgery. The increased incidence of pain mirrors a parallel increase in the use of polypropylene meshes. Neither triple neurectomy nor careful nerve preservation has brought relief. Perhaps because we have forgotten that nerves, in response to some evolutionary mechanism, tend to regenerate, undergo changes imposed by prosthetic elements and architecture, mimicking entrapment and compartment syndromes. METHODS: A total of 33 hernia meshes have been analyzed: 17 excised due to severe pain, two for combined pain and recurrence, 14 sampled during revision for recurrence without pain. Each mesh had standardized sampling for histology and the nerves were highlighted by S100 stain. Nerve densities were assessed within the mesh spaces and in tissue outside the mesh. RESULTS: The density of nerves present in the standardized mesh samples of patients complaining of pain was much more elevated than in the mesh of those patients who had a recurrence but no pain. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Excluding two patients who had both pain and recurrence, the difference was even more marked (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Re-innervation and neo-innervation are known to take place following hernia repairs in indigenous tissue as well as through polypropylene meshes. However, when pain is an overriding issue dictating mesh explant, the degree of mesh innervation is significantly higher when compared to mesh excised for recurrence. That increase has been confirmed statistically.
PURPOSE: The objective is to compare nerve densities in explanted polypropylene meshes in patients with or without chronic pain. Pain has supplanted recurrences as a complication of hernia surgery. The increased incidence of pain mirrors a parallel increase in the use of polypropylene meshes. Neither triple neurectomy nor careful nerve preservation has brought relief. Perhaps because we have forgotten that nerves, in response to some evolutionary mechanism, tend to regenerate, undergo changes imposed by prosthetic elements and architecture, mimicking entrapment and compartment syndromes. METHODS: A total of 33 hernia meshes have been analyzed: 17 excised due to severe pain, two for combined pain and recurrence, 14 sampled during revision for recurrence without pain. Each mesh had standardized sampling for histology and the nerves were highlighted by S100 stain. Nerve densities were assessed within the mesh spaces and in tissue outside the mesh. RESULTS: The density of nerves present in the standardized mesh samples of patients complaining of pain was much more elevated than in the mesh of those patients who had a recurrence but no pain. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Excluding two patients who had both pain and recurrence, the difference was even more marked (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Re-innervation and neo-innervation are known to take place following hernia repairs in indigenous tissue as well as through polypropylene meshes. However, when pain is an overriding issue dictating mesh explant, the degree of mesh innervation is significantly higher when compared to mesh excised for recurrence. That increase has been confirmed statistically.
Authors: David Shin; Larry I Lipshultz; Marc Goldstein; Gregory A Barmé; Eugene F Fuchs; Harris M Nagler; Stewart W McCallum; Craig S Niederberger; Richard A Schoor; Victor M Brugh; Stanton C Honig Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Amudha S Poobalan; Julie Bruce; W Cairns S Smith; Peter M King; Zygmunt H Krukowski; W Alastair Chambers Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: James G Bittner; Kevin El-Hayek; Andrew T Strong; Melissa Phillips LaPinska; Jin S Yoo; Eric M Pauli; Matthew Kroh Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Elisabeth Kjær Jensen; Thomas K Ringsted; Joakim M Bischoff; Morten A Petersen; Jacob Rosenberg; Henrik Kehlet; Mads U Werner Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 1.817