George F Guirguis1, Michael M Aziz2, Claire Boccia Liang3, Shauna F Williams4, Joseph J Apuzzio4, Robyn Bilinski4, Adenieki J D Mornan2, Leena P Shah5. 1. Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States. Electronic address: guirgugf@njms.rutgers.edu. 2. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Atlantic Health System, Morristown, NJ, United States. 3. Department of Cardiology, Atlantic Health System, Morristown, NJ, United States. 4. Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States. 5. Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Atlantic Health System, Morristown, NJ, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if preeclampsia is an independent predictor of diastolic dysfunction and what factors among patients with preeclampsia are associated with diastolic dysfunction. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who delivered between 2008 and 2013 at a single institution who had a maternal echocardiogram during their pregnancy or within 5months of delivery. Patients with structural heart disease, ejection fraction less than 45%, pulmonary embolus, or age over 45years were excluded. Medical records were reviewed for medical and obstetric complications and echocardiogram findings. Demographic characteristics and rate of diastolic dysfunction were compared between patients with preeclampsia and without preeclampsia. Multivariate logistic regression was performed controlling for age, ethnicity, gestational age at delivery, diabetes, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), antihypertensive use and magnesium sulfate administration. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were identified, of which 39 (59%) had preeclampsia. Past history of preeclampsia, IUGR in the current pregnancy, antihypertensive use and magnesium sulfate use were higher in the preeclampsia group. Fifteen patients (39%) in the preeclampsia group were African-American compared to 2 (3%) in the control group (p<0.01). Seventeen (44%) of the patients with preeclampsia were found to have diastolic dysfunction compared to 3 (11%) controls (OR=6.18, 95% CI 1.59,24.02; p=0.006). Logistic regression analysis did not reveal other independent predictors of diastolic dysfunction. In the patients with preeclampsia, history of preeclampsia with severe features and IUGR were not associated with diastolic dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports previous findings that preeclampsia is associated with diastolic dysfunction.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if preeclampsia is an independent predictor of diastolic dysfunction and what factors among patients with preeclampsia are associated with diastolic dysfunction. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who delivered between 2008 and 2013 at a single institution who had a maternal echocardiogram during their pregnancy or within 5months of delivery. Patients with structural heart disease, ejection fraction less than 45%, pulmonary embolus, or age over 45years were excluded. Medical records were reviewed for medical and obstetric complications and echocardiogram findings. Demographic characteristics and rate of diastolic dysfunction were compared between patients with preeclampsia and without preeclampsia. Multivariate logistic regression was performed controlling for age, ethnicity, gestational age at delivery, diabetes, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), antihypertensive use and magnesium sulfate administration. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were identified, of which 39 (59%) had preeclampsia. Past history of preeclampsia, IUGR in the current pregnancy, antihypertensive use and magnesium sulfate use were higher in the preeclampsia group. Fifteen patients (39%) in the preeclampsia group were African-American compared to 2 (3%) in the control group (p<0.01). Seventeen (44%) of the patients with preeclampsia were found to have diastolic dysfunction compared to 3 (11%) controls (OR=6.18, 95% CI 1.59,24.02; p=0.006). Logistic regression analysis did not reveal other independent predictors of diastolic dysfunction. In the patients with preeclampsia, history of preeclampsia with severe features and IUGR were not associated with diastolic dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports previous findings that preeclampsia is associated with diastolic dysfunction.
Authors: Arthur Jason Vaught; Lara C Kovell; Linda M Szymanski; Susan A Mayer; Sara M Seifert; Dhananjay Vaidya; Jamie D Murphy; Cynthia Argani; Anna O'Kelly; Sarah York; Pamela Ouyang; Monica Mukherjee; Sammy Zakaria Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-07-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Bhavisha A Bakrania; Frank T Spradley; Heather A Drummond; Babbette LaMarca; Michael J Ryan; Joey P Granger Journal: Compr Physiol Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 9.090
Authors: Lina Bergman; Karl Bergman; Eduard Langenegger; Ashley Moodley; Stephanie Griffith-Richards; Johan Wikström; David Hall; Lloyd Joubert; Philip Herbst; Sonja Schell; Teelkien van Veen; Michael Belfort; Stephen Y C Tong; Susan Walker; Roxanne Hastie; Catherine Cluver Journal: Cells Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Anouk Bokslag; Constantijn Franssen; Lisa J Alma; Igor Kovacevic; Floortje van Kesteren; Pim W Teunissen; Otto Kamp; Wessel Ganzevoort; Peter L Hordijk; Christianne J M de Groot; Walter J Paulus Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 3.240