Peter Spazzapan1, Eric Arnaud1, Genevieve Baujat2, Mathilde Nizon3, Valerie Malan3, Francis Brunelle4, Federico Di Rocco5. 1. Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Craniofacial Unit, Necker Enfants Malades Hospital, 156 rue de Vaugirard, 75015, Paris, France. 2. Department of Medical Genetics, Necker Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France. 3. Department of Genetics, Necker Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France. 4. Department of Radiology, Necker Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France. 5. Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Craniofacial Unit, Necker Enfants Malades Hospital, 156 rue de Vaugirard, 75015, Paris, France. federicodirocco@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 9p deletion syndrome is a rare condition, which associates trigonocephaly, facial dysmorphism and developmental delay. The neuroradiological aspects of this syndrome have not yet been described. The purpose of this article is to identify the clinical and neuroradiological features, that should be recognized by all specialists treating these children, for a proper and early diagnosis. METHODS: Among patients with trigonocephaly treated at our institution, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical and neuroradiological aspects of children with genetically confirmed 9p deletion syndrome. RESULTS: 6 patients were identified. Beside trigonocephaly, the most frequent clinical findings were small ears, long philtrum, upslanting palpebral fissures, flat nasal bridge and variable psycho-motor delay. Hypertelorism was present in 4 of 6 patient, which is opposite to the hypotelorism typical of non-syndromic trigonocephaly. Among neuroradiological findings, large, anteriorly rotated sylvian cisterns and altered shape of the septum pellucidum were found in all patients, as well as the compression of the frontal cortex due to the metopic synostosis (MS). A thin or dysmorphic corpus callosum and a diffuse white matter hypoplasia were present in more than half of the cases. Futhermore we compared these MRI findings with those of a control group of 30 non-syndromic trigonocephalies. CONCLUSIONS: Some recurrent neuroradiological alterations can be found in 9p deletion syndrome. The presence of these signs on MRI of a trigonocephalic patient should raise the suspicion of an underlying chromosomal alteration, such as the 9p deletion syndrome and prompt genetic investigations.
BACKGROUND: The 9p deletion syndrome is a rare condition, which associates trigonocephaly, facial dysmorphism and developmental delay. The neuroradiological aspects of this syndrome have not yet been described. The purpose of this article is to identify the clinical and neuroradiological features, that should be recognized by all specialists treating these children, for a proper and early diagnosis. METHODS: Among patients with trigonocephaly treated at our institution, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical and neuroradiological aspects of children with genetically confirmed 9p deletion syndrome. RESULTS: 6 patients were identified. Beside trigonocephaly, the most frequent clinical findings were small ears, long philtrum, upslanting palpebral fissures, flat nasal bridge and variable psycho-motor delay. Hypertelorism was present in 4 of 6 patient, which is opposite to the hypotelorism typical of non-syndromic trigonocephaly. Among neuroradiological findings, large, anteriorly rotated sylvian cisterns and altered shape of the septum pellucidum were found in all patients, as well as the compression of the frontal cortex due to the metopic synostosis (MS). A thin or dysmorphic corpus callosum and a diffuse white matter hypoplasia were present in more than half of the cases. Futhermore we compared these MRI findings with those of a control group of 30 non-syndromic trigonocephalies. CONCLUSIONS: Some recurrent neuroradiological alterations can be found in 9p deletion syndrome. The presence of these signs on MRI of a trigonocephalic patient should raise the suspicion of an underlying chromosomal alteration, such as the 9p deletion syndrome and prompt genetic investigations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Craniosynostosis; Magnetic resonance; Trigonocephaly
Authors: Joyce M G Florisson; Jeroen Dudink; Irene V Koning; Wim C J Hop; Marie-Lise C van Veelen; Irene M J Mathijssen; Maarten H Lequin Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lisenka E L M Vissers; Timothy C Cox; A Murat Maga; Kieran M Short; Fenny Wiradjaja; Irene M Janssen; Fernanda Jehee; Debora Bertola; Jia Liu; Garima Yagnik; Kiyotoshi Sekiguchi; Daiji Kiyozumi; Hans van Bokhoven; Carlo Marcelis; Michael L Cunningham; Peter J Anderson; Simeon A Boyadjiev; Maria Rita Passos-Bueno; Joris A Veltman; Ian Smyth; Michael F Buckley; Tony Roscioli Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Ilária C Sgardioli; Matheus de Mello Copelli; Fabíola P Monteiro; Ana P Dos Santos; Elaine Lustosa Mendes; Társis Paiva Vieira; Vera L Gil-da-Silva-Lopes Journal: Mol Syndromol Date: 2017-06-24
Authors: Amal M Mohamed; Alaa K Kamel; Maha M Eid; Ola M Eid; Mona Mekkawy; Shymaa H Hussein; Maha S Zaki; Samira Esmail; Hanan H Afifi; Ghada Y El-Kamah; Ghada A Otaify; Heba Ahmed El-Awady; Aya Elaidy; Mahmoud Y Essa; Mona El-Ruby; Engy A Ashaat; Saida A Hammad; Inas Mazen; Ghada M H Abdel-Salam; Mona Aglan; Samia Temtamy Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med Date: 2021-10-05 Impact factor: 2.183