Linda C Zandbelt1, Froukje E C de Kanter2, Dirk T Ubbink3. 1. Department of Quality and Process Innovation, Academic Medical Center at the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: l.c.zandbelt@amc.uva.nl. 2. Academic Medical Center at the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: froukjedekanter@msn.com. 3. Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center at the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: d.ubbink@amc.uva.nl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Today's technology provides new ways of consulting between patients and medical specialists in health care, such as videoconferencing and web-messaging. In this systematic review we assessed the effects of e-consulting between medical specialists and patients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psychlit and Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials assessing the use of e-consulting methods (videoconferencing (VC) or web-messaging (WM)), as compared to conventional care (face-to-face (FF) or telephone consultations (TC)) in a medical specialist setting. We extracted patient-related, physician-related, cost, time and follow-up outcomes. RESULTS: We included 21 trials, of which 17 addressed VC compared to FF, two compared WM with FF, one VC with TC, and one WM with TC. Physicians appeared to prefer face-to-face consultations over videoconferencing. Patients appeared to be as satisfied with videoconferencing as with face-to-face contacts, but preferred videoconferencing and web-messaging over telephone consultations. Videoconferencing was more expensive regarding equipment, but saved patient-related costs in terms of time, transportation, and missed work. Variable results were found for consult time and follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We cautiously conclude that e-consulting seems a feasible alternative to medical specialists' face-to-face follow-up or telephone appointments, but may be less suitable for initial consultations requiring physical examination.
OBJECTIVE: Today's technology provides new ways of consulting between patients and medical specialists in health care, such as videoconferencing and web-messaging. In this systematic review we assessed the effects of e-consulting between medical specialists and patients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psychlit and Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials assessing the use of e-consulting methods (videoconferencing (VC) or web-messaging (WM)), as compared to conventional care (face-to-face (FF) or telephone consultations (TC)) in a medical specialist setting. We extracted patient-related, physician-related, cost, time and follow-up outcomes. RESULTS: We included 21 trials, of which 17 addressed VC compared to FF, two compared WM with FF, one VC with TC, and one WM with TC. Physicians appeared to prefer face-to-face consultations over videoconferencing. Patients appeared to be as satisfied with videoconferencing as with face-to-face contacts, but preferred videoconferencing and web-messaging over telephone consultations. Videoconferencing was more expensive regarding equipment, but saved patient-related costs in terms of time, transportation, and missed work. Variable results were found for consult time and follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We cautiously conclude that e-consulting seems a feasible alternative to medical specialists' face-to-face follow-up or telephone appointments, but may be less suitable for initial consultations requiring physical examination.
Authors: Felicia Gabrielsson-Järhult; Sofia Kjellström; Kristina Areskoug Josefsson Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Anu Kaskinen; Benjamin Ayeboa-Sallah; Tiina Teivaanmäki; Elina Wärnhjelm; Liisa Korhonen; Otto Helve Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Diego Garcia-Huidobro; Solange Rivera; Sebastián Valderrama Chang; Paula Bravo; Daniel Capurro Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jose Diaz-Miron; Sarah Ogle; Alex Kaizer; Shannon N Acker; Kyle O Rove; Thomas H Inge Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 1.827