Thomas Opladen1, Martin Lindner2, Anibh M Das3, Thorsten Marquardt4, Aneal Khan5, Sukru H Emre6, Barbara K Burton7, Bruce A Barshop8, Thea Böhm9, Jochen Meyburg10, Kathrin Zangerl11, Sebene Mayorandan12, Peter Burgard13, Ulrich H N Dürr14, Bernd Rosenkranz15, Jörg Rennecke16, Jens Derbinski17, Marc Yudkoff18, Georg F Hoffmann19. 1. Division of Neuropediatrics and Pediatric Metabolic Medicine, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: Thomas.Opladen@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 2. Division of Neuropediatrics and Pediatric Metabolic Medicine, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Neuropaediatrics, Prevention, Endocrinology and Pediatric Metabolic Diseases, University Children's Hospital Frankfurt, Germany. Electronic address: Martin.Lindner@kgu.de. 3. Division of Metabolic Disorders, Medical School Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: Das.Anibh@mh-hannover.de. 4. Division of Metabolic Disorders, University Children's Hospital Münster, Germany. Electronic address: Thorsten.Marquardt@ukmuenster.de. 5. Department of Medical Genetics & Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Canada. Electronic address: khaa@ucalgary.ca. 6. Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA. Electronic address: sukru.emre@yale.edu. 7. Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, USA. Electronic address: BBurton@luriechildrens.org. 8. Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: bbarshop@ucsd.edu. 9. Cytonet GmbH & Co. KG, Albert-Ludwig-Grimm-Str. 20, Weinheim, Germany. Electronic address: Thea.boehm@gmx.net. 10. Division of Neuropediatrics and Pediatric Metabolic Medicine, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: Jochen.Meyburg@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 11. Division of Neuropediatrics and Pediatric Metabolic Medicine, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: kathrin.zangerl@gmail.com. 12. Division of Metabolic Disorders, Medical School Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: Sebene.Mayorandan@ukmuenster.de. 13. Division of Neuropediatrics and Pediatric Metabolic Medicine, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: Peter.Burgard@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 14. Cytonet GmbH & Co. KG, Albert-Ludwig-Grimm-Str. 20, Weinheim, Germany. Electronic address: Ulrich.Duerr@cytonet.de. 15. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University, South Africa. Electronic address: rosenkranz@sun.ac.za. 16. Cytonet GmbH & Co. KG, Albert-Ludwig-Grimm-Str. 20, Weinheim, Germany. Electronic address: Joerg.Rennecke@cytonet.de. 17. Cytonet GmbH & Co. KG, Albert-Ludwig-Grimm-Str. 20, Weinheim, Germany. Electronic address: Jens.Derbinski@cytonet.de. 18. Division of Metabolic Disease, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, USA. Electronic address: yudkoff@email.chop.edu. 19. Division of Neuropediatrics and Pediatric Metabolic Medicine, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: Georg.Hoffmann@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The hepatic urea cycle is the main metabolic pathway for detoxification of ammonia. Inborn errors of urea cycle function present with severe hyperammonemia and a high case fatality rate. Long-term prognosis depends on the residual activity of the defective enzyme. A reliable method to estimate urea cycle activity in-vivo does not exist yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate a practical method to quantify (13)C-urea production as a marker for urea cycle function in healthy subjects, patients with confirmed urea cycle defect (UCD) and asymptomatic carriers of UCD mutations. METHODS: (13)C-labeled sodium acetate was applied orally in a single dose to 47 subjects (10 healthy subjects, 28 symptomatic patients, 9 asymptomatic carriers). RESULTS: The oral (13)C-ureagenesis assay is a safe method. While healthy subjects and asymptomatic carriers did not differ with regards to kinetic variables for urea cycle flux, symptomatic patients had lower (13)C-plasma urea levels. Although the (13)C-ureagenesis assay revealed no significant differences between individual urea cycle enzyme defects, it reflected the heterogeneity between different clinical subgroups, including male neonatal onset ornithine carbamoyltransferase deficiency. Applying the (13)C-urea area under the curve can differentiate between severe from more mildly affected neonates. Late onset patients differ significantly from neonates, carriers and healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: This study evaluated the oral (13)C-ureagenesis assay as a sensitive in-vivo measure for ureagenesis capacity. The assay has the potential to become a reliable tool to differentiate UCD patient subgroups, follow changes in ureagenesis capacity and could be helpful in monitoring novel therapies of UCD.
BACKGROUND: The hepatic urea cycle is the main metabolic pathway for detoxification of ammonia. Inborn errors of urea cycle function present with severe hyperammonemia and a high case fatality rate. Long-term prognosis depends on the residual activity of the defective enzyme. A reliable method to estimate urea cycle activity in-vivo does not exist yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate a practical method to quantify (13)C-urea production as a marker for urea cycle function in healthy subjects, patients with confirmed urea cycle defect (UCD) and asymptomatic carriers of UCD mutations. METHODS:(13)C-labeled sodium acetate was applied orally in a single dose to 47 subjects (10 healthy subjects, 28 symptomatic patients, 9 asymptomatic carriers). RESULTS: The oral (13)C-ureagenesis assay is a safe method. While healthy subjects and asymptomatic carriers did not differ with regards to kinetic variables for urea cycle flux, symptomatic patients had lower (13)C-plasma urea levels. Although the (13)C-ureagenesis assay revealed no significant differences between individual urea cycle enzyme defects, it reflected the heterogeneity between different clinical subgroups, including male neonatal onset ornithine carbamoyltransferase deficiency. Applying the (13)C-urea area under the curve can differentiate between severe from more mildly affected neonates. Late onset patients differ significantly from neonates, carriers and healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: This study evaluated the oral (13)C-ureagenesis assay as a sensitive in-vivo measure for ureagenesis capacity. The assay has the potential to become a reliable tool to differentiate UCD patient subgroups, follow changes in ureagenesis capacity and could be helpful in monitoring novel therapies of UCD.
Authors: Jochen Meyburg; Thomas Opladen; Ute Spiekerkötter; Andrea Schlune; Jens-Peter Schenk; Jan Schmidt; Jürgen Weitz; Jürgen Okun; Friederike Bürger; Tawfeg Ben Omran; Ghassan Abdoh; Hilal Al Rifai; Ahmad Monavari; Vassiliki Konstantopoulou; Stefan Kölker; Marc Yudkoff; Georg F Hoffmann Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 4.982