Literature DB >> 26596795

Return to Sports and Physical Activities After Primary Partial Arthrodesis for Lisfranc Injuries in Young Patients.

Aoife MacMahon1, Paul Kim1, David S Levine1, Jayme Burket2, Matthew M Roberts1, Mark C Drakos1, Jonathan T Deland1, Andrew J Elliott1, Scott J Ellis3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research regarding outcomes in sports and physical activities after primary partial arthrodesis for Lisfranc injuries has been sparse. The purposes of this study were to assess various sports and physical activities in young patients following primary partial arthrodesis for Lisfranc injuries and to compare these with clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Patients who underwent primary partial arthrodesis for a Lisfranc injury were identified by a retrospective registry review. Thirty-eight of 46 eligible patients (83%) responded for follow-up at a mean of 5.2 (range, 1.0 to 9.3) years with a mean age at surgery of 31.8 (range, 16.8 to 50.3) years. Physical activity participation was assessed with a new sports-specific, patient-administered questionnaire. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).
RESULTS: Patients participated in 29 different and 155 total physical activities preoperatively, and 27 different and 145 total physical activities postoperatively. Preoperatively, 47.1% were high impact, and postoperatively, 44.8% were high impact. The most common activities were walking, bicycling, running, and weightlifting. Compared to preoperatively, difficulty was the same in 66% and increased in 34% of physical activities. Participation levels were improved in 11%, the same in 64%, and impaired in 25% of physical activities. Patients spent on average 4.2 (range, 0.0 to 19.8) hours per week exercising postoperatively. In regard to return to physical activity, 97% of respondents were satisfied with their operative outcome. Mean postoperative FAOS subscores were significantly worse for patients who had increased physical activity difficulty.
CONCLUSION: Most patients were able to return to their previous physical activities following primary partial arthrodesis for a Lisfranc injury, many of which were high-impact. However, the decreased participation or increase in difficulty of some activities suggests that some patients experienced postoperative limitations in exercise. Future studies could compare sports outcomes between primary partial arthrodesis and open reduction internal fixation for Lisfranc injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lisfranc injury; arthrodesis; outcome studies; sports; trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26596795     DOI: 10.1177/1071100715617743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  4 in total

Review 1.  Lisfranc injuries.

Authors:  Michael P Clare
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-03

2.  Comparison of primary arthrodesis versus open reduction with internal fixation for Lisfranc injuries: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  P F Han; Z L Zhang; C L Chen; Y C Han; X C Wei; P C Li
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.476

Review 3.  Lisfranc fracture-dislocations: current management.

Authors:  Inmaculada Moracia-Ochagavía; E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-07-02

4.  Return to Sport after Surgical Treatment of Lisfranc Injuries in Athletes: A Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Bryan G Vopat; Matthew L Vopat; Pim A D van Dijk; Sean Hazzard; Kayla McKinnon; Peter D Asnis; George H Theodore
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2019-11-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.