Literature DB >> 26596534

Body ram, not suction, is the primary axis of suction-feeding diversity in spiny-rayed fishes.

Sarah J Longo1, Matthew D McGee2, Christopher E Oufiero3, Thomas B Waltzek4, Peter C Wainwright2.   

Abstract

Suction-feeding fishes exhibit diverse prey-capture strategies that vary in their relative use of suction and predator approach (ram), which is often referred to as the ram-suction continuum. Previous research has found that ram varies more than suction distance among species, such that ram accounts for most differences in prey-capture behaviors. To determine whether these findings hold at broad evolutionary scales, we collected high-speed videos of 40 species of spiny-rayed fishes (Acanthomorpha) feeding on live prey. For each strike, we calculated the contributions of suction, body ram (swimming) and jaw ram (mouth movement relative to the body) to closing the distance between predator and prey. We confirm that the contribution of suction distance is limited even in this phylogenetically and ecologically broad sample of species, with the extreme suction area of prey-capture space conspicuously unoccupied. Instead of a continuum from suction to ram, we find that variation in body ram is the major factor underlying the diversity of prey-capture strategies among suction-feeding fishes. Independent measurement of the contribution of jaw ram revealed that it is an important component of diversity among spiny-rayed fishes, with a number of ecomorphologies relying heavily on jaw ram, including pivot feeding in syngnathiforms, extreme jaw protruders and benthic sit-and-wait ambush predators. A combination of morphological and behavioral innovations has allowed fish to invade the extreme jaw ram area of prey-capture space. We caution that while two-species comparisons may support a ram-suction trade-off, these patterns do not speak to broader patterns across spiny-rayed fishes.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acanthomorpha; Constraint; Continuum; Jaw ram; Prey capture; Ram–suction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26596534     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.129015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  11 in total

1.  Acquired versus innate prey capturing skills in super-precocial live-bearing fish.

Authors:  Martin J Lankheet; Twan Stoffers; Johan L van Leeuwen; Bart J A Pollux
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Extremely fast feeding strikes are powered by elastic recoil in a seahorse relative, the snipefish, Macroramphosus scolopax.

Authors:  Sarah J Longo; Tyler Goodearly; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Dual function of epaxial musculature for swimming and suction feeding in largemouth bass.

Authors:  Yordano E Jimenez; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Forensic odontology: Assessing bite wounds to determine the role of teeth in piscivorous fishes.

Authors:  Pooventhran Muruga; David R Bellwood; Michalis Mihalitsis
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2022-03-12

5.  Functional implications of dentition-based morphotypes in piscivorous fishes.

Authors:  Michalis Mihalitsis; David Bellwood
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Habitat influences skeletal morphology and density in the snailfishes (family Liparidae).

Authors:  M E Gerringer; A S Dias; A A von Hagel; J W Orr; A P Summers; S Farina
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  The feeding system of Tiktaalik roseae: an intermediate between suction feeding and biting.

Authors:  Justin B Lemberg; Edward B Daeschler; Neil H Shubin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Trophic guilds of suction-feeding fishes are distinguished by their characteristic hydrodynamics of swimming and feeding.

Authors:  Karin H Olsson; Roi Gurka; Roi Holzman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 5.530

9.  A new conceptual framework for the musculoskeletal biomechanics and physiology of ray-finned fishes.

Authors:  Ariel L Camp; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  A new theoretical performance landscape for suction feeding reveals adaptive kinematics in a natural population of reef damselfish.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; Tal Keren; Moshe Kiflawi; Christopher H Martin; Victor China; Ofri Mann; Karin H Olsson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.