OBJECTIVE: Differentially worse performance on category versus letter fluency suggests greater semantic versus retrieval difficulties. This discrepancy, combined with reduced episodic memory, has widespread clinical utility in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD). Our objective was to investigate whether changes in semantic processing, as measured by the discrepancy between category and letter fluency, was detectable in preclinical AD: in clinically normal older adults with abnormal β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition on positron emission tomography (PET) neuroimaging. METHOD: Clinically normal older adults (mean Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) score = 29) were classified as Aβ+ (n = 70) or Aβ- (n = 205) using Pittsburgh Compound B-(PET) imaging. Participants completed letter fluency (FAS; word generation to letters F-A-S) and category fluency (CAT; word generation to animals, vegetables, fruits) annually (mean follow-up = 2.42 years). The effect of Aβ status on fluency over time was examined using linear mixed models controlling for age, sex, and education. To dissociate effects related to semantic (CAT) versus retrieval processes (CAT and FAS), we repeated models predicting CAT over time, controlling for FAS and likewise for CAT controlling for FAS. RESULTS: At baseline, the Aβ+ group performed better on FAS compared with the Aβ- group but comparably on CAT. Longitudinally, the Aβ+ group demonstrated greater decline on CAT compared with the Aβ- group (p = .0011). This finding remained significant even when covarying for FAS (p = .0107). Aβ+ participants similarly declined compared with Aβ- participants on FAS (p = .0112), but this effect became insignificant when covarying for CAT (p = .1607). CONCLUSION: These findings provide biomarker validation for the greater specificity of declines in category versus letter fluency to underlying AD pathology. Our results also suggest that changes in semantic processing occur earlier in the AD trajectory than previously hypothesized. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: Differentially worse performance on category versus letter fluency suggests greater semantic versus retrieval difficulties. This discrepancy, combined with reduced episodic memory, has widespread clinical utility in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD). Our objective was to investigate whether changes in semantic processing, as measured by the discrepancy between category and letter fluency, was detectable in preclinical AD: in clinically normal older adults with abnormal β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition on positron emission tomography (PET) neuroimaging. METHOD: Clinically normal older adults (mean Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) score = 29) were classified as Aβ+ (n = 70) or Aβ- (n = 205) using Pittsburgh Compound B-(PET) imaging. Participants completed letter fluency (FAS; word generation to letters F-A-S) and category fluency (CAT; word generation to animals, vegetables, fruits) annually (mean follow-up = 2.42 years). The effect of Aβ status on fluency over time was examined using linear mixed models controlling for age, sex, and education. To dissociate effects related to semantic (CAT) versus retrieval processes (CAT and FAS), we repeated models predicting CAT over time, controlling for FAS and likewise for CAT controlling for FAS. RESULTS: At baseline, the Aβ+ group performed better on FAS compared with the Aβ- group but comparably on CAT. Longitudinally, the Aβ+ group demonstrated greater decline on CAT compared with the Aβ- group (p = .0011). This finding remained significant even when covarying for FAS (p = .0107). Aβ+ participants similarly declined compared with Aβ- participants on FAS (p = .0112), but this effect became insignificant when covarying for CAT (p = .1607). CONCLUSION: These findings provide biomarker validation for the greater specificity of declines in category versus letter fluency to underlying AD pathology. Our results also suggest that changes in semantic processing occur earlier in the AD trajectory than previously hypothesized. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Michael C Donohue; Anthony Gamst; Rema Raman; Ronald G Thomas; Sarah Walter; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw; Laurel A Beckett; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Arthur W Toga; Andrew J Saykin; John C Morris; Robert C Green; Michael W Weiner Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Katherine E Nutter-Upham; Andrew J Saykin; Laura A Rabin; Robert M Roth; Heather A Wishart; Nadia Pare; Laura A Flashman Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: Miranka Wirth; Hwamee Oh; Elizabeth C Mormino; Candace Markley; Susan M Landau; William J Jagust Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Chester A Mathis; Yanming Wang; Daniel P Holt; Guo-Feng Huang; Manik L Debnath; William E Klunk Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2003-06-19 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Dorene M Rentz; Blair K Weiss; Emily G Jacobs; Sara Cherkerzian; Anne Klibanski; Anne Remington; Harlyn Aizley; Jill M Goldstein Journal: Menopause Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Joseph R Winer; Bryce A Mander; Samika Kumar; Mark Reed; Suzanne L Baker; William J Jagust; Matthew P Walker Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Deepti Putcha; Bradford C Dickerson; Michael Brickhouse; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Kathryn V Papp Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Elizabeth C Mormino; Kathryn V Papp; Dorene M Rentz; Michael C Donohue; Rebecca Amariglio; Yakeel T Quiroz; Jasmeer Chhatwal; Gad A Marshall; Nancy Donovan; Jonathan Jackson; Jennifer R Gatchel; Bernard J Hanseeuw; Aaron P Schultz; Paul S Aisen; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Kimberly D Mueller; Rebecca L Koscik; Lianlian Du; Davide Bruno; Erin M Jonaitis; Audra Z Koscik; Bradley T Christian; Tobey J Betthauser; Nathaniel A Chin; Bruce P Hermann; Sterling C Johnson Journal: Cortex Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 4.027
Authors: Kimberly D Mueller; Rebecca L Koscik; Lindsay R Clark; Bruce P Hermann; Sterling C Johnson; Lyn S Turkstra Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 2.813