Lauren H Smith1, Todd A Kuiken, Levi J Hargrove. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering at, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. Center for Bionic Medicine at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Clinically available prostheses for transradial amputees do not allow simultaneous myoelectric control of degrees of freedom (DOFs). Linear regression methods can provide simultaneous myoelectric control, but frequently also result in difficulty with isolating individual DOFs when desired. This study evaluated the potential of using probabilistic estimates of categories of gross prosthesis movement, which are commonly used in classification-based myoelectric control, to enhance linear regression myoelectric control. APPROACH: Gaussian models were fit to electromyogram (EMG) feature distributions for three movement classes at each DOF (no movement, or movement in either direction) and used to weight the output of linear regression models by the probability that the user intended the movement. Eight able-bodied and two transradial amputee subjects worked in a virtual Fitts' law task to evaluate differences in controllability between linear regression and probability-weighted regression for an intramuscular EMG-based three-DOF wrist and hand system. MAIN RESULTS: Real-time and offline analyses in able-bodied subjects demonstrated that probability weighting improved performance during single-DOF tasks (p < 0.05) by preventing extraneous movement at additional DOFs. Similar results were seen in experiments with two transradial amputees. Though goodness-of-fit evaluations suggested that the EMG feature distributions showed some deviations from the Gaussian, equal-covariance assumptions used in this experiment, the assumptions were sufficiently met to provide improved performance compared to linear regression control. SIGNIFICANCE: Use of probability weights can improve the ability to isolate individual during linear regression myoelectric control, while maintaining the ability to simultaneously control multiple DOFs.
OBJECTIVE: Clinically available prostheses for transradial amputees do not allow simultaneous myoelectric control of degrees of freedom (DOFs). Linear regression methods can provide simultaneous myoelectric control, but frequently also result in difficulty with isolating individual DOFs when desired. This study evaluated the potential of using probabilistic estimates of categories of gross prosthesis movement, which are commonly used in classification-based myoelectric control, to enhance linear regression myoelectric control. APPROACH: Gaussian models were fit to electromyogram (EMG) feature distributions for three movement classes at each DOF (no movement, or movement in either direction) and used to weight the output of linear regression models by the probability that the user intended the movement. Eight able-bodied and two transradial amputee subjects worked in a virtual Fitts' law task to evaluate differences in controllability between linear regression and probability-weighted regression for an intramuscular EMG-based three-DOF wrist and hand system. MAIN RESULTS: Real-time and offline analyses in able-bodied subjects demonstrated that probability weighting improved performance during single-DOF tasks (p < 0.05) by preventing extraneous movement at additional DOFs. Similar results were seen in experiments with two transradial amputees. Though goodness-of-fit evaluations suggested that the EMG feature distributions showed some deviations from the Gaussian, equal-covariance assumptions used in this experiment, the assumptions were sufficiently met to provide improved performance compared to linear regression control. SIGNIFICANCE: Use of probability weights can improve the ability to isolate individual during linear regression myoelectric control, while maintaining the ability to simultaneously control multiple DOFs.
Authors: Ning Jiang; Hubertus Rehbaum; Ivan Vujaklija; Bernhard Graimann; Dario Farina Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Ning Jiang; Ivan Vujaklija; Hubertus Rehbaum; Bernhard Graimann; Dario Farina Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Ali Ameri; Ernest N Kamavuako; Erik J Scheme; Kevin B Englehart; Philip A Parker Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Paul F Pasquina; Melissa Evangelista; A J Carvalho; Joseph Lockhart; Sarah Griffin; George Nanos; Patricia McKay; Morten Hansen; Derek Ipsen; James Vandersea; Josef Butkus; Matthew Miller; Ian Murphy; David Hankin Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Philip P Vu; Alex K Vaskov; Zachary T Irwin; Phillip T Henning; Daniel R Lueders; Ann T Laidlaw; Alicia J Davis; Chrono S Nu; Deanna H Gates; R Brent Gillespie; Stephen W P Kemp; Theodore A Kung; Cynthia A Chestek; Paul S Cederna Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Philip P Vu; Cynthia A Chestek; Samuel R Nason; Theodore A Kung; Stephen W P Kemp; Paul S Cederna Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Cristina Piazza; Matteo Rossi; Manuel G Catalano; Antonio Bicchi; Levi J Hargrove Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 4.528