Literature DB >> 26595134

Application of Session Rating of Perceived Exertion Among Different Models of Resistance Training in Older Adults.

Jenny A Conlon1, G Gregory Haff, James J Tufano, Robert U Newton.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between external measures of resistance training (RT) workload and intensity, volume load (VL) and training intensity (TI), and related internal measures, session load and session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), across a chronic RT intervention and between different models of RT in older adults. Forty-one healthy, untrained older adults (female, 21; male, 20; age, 70.9 ± 5.1 years; height, 166.3 ± 8.2 cm; weight, 72.9 ± 13.4 kg) were randomly stratified into 3 RT groups: nonperiodized (NP), block periodized (BP), or daily undulating periodized (DUP). They completed a 22-week RT intervention at a frequency of 3 d·wk. All training was executed on RT machines, and training volume was equalized between training groups based on total repetitions. Session RPE was measured 10-15 minutes after each training session. There were no meaningful relationships between VL and session load or TI and sRPE. Also, no significant differences were detected between training groups for mean sRPE across the training intervention. Based on these results, session load and sRPE do not appear to be valid markers of RT workload and intensity when compared with established external measures in healthy untrained older adults. However, sRPE and session load may hold promise as monitoring tools in RT that do not involve training to muscular failure. Furthermore, sRPE does not significantly differ between NP, BP, and DUP RT models, highlighting that this measure is not sensitive to such periodization as evident in the present study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26595134     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tyler D Williams; Danilo V Tolusso; Michael V Fedewa; Michael R Esco
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Multi-joint vs. Single-joint Resistance Exercises Induce a Similar Strength Increase in Trained Men: A Randomized Longitudinal Crossover Study.

Authors:  Felipe A Brigatto; JÚlio B B DE Camargo; Witter F DE Ungaro; MoisÉs D Germano; Paulo H Marchetti; Marcelo S Aoki; Tiago V Braz; Charles R Lopes
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 3.  Evidence-based recommendations for resistance and power training to prevent frailty in community-dwellers.

Authors:  Hélio José Coelho-Júnior; Marco Carlos Uchida; Anna Picca; Roberto Bernabei; Francesco Landi; Riccardo Calvani; Matteo Cesari; Emanuele Marzetti
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  High-Load and Low-Load Resistance Exercise in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Feasibility and Safety of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Tim Kambic; Nejc Šarabon; Vedran Hadžić; Mitja Lainscak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.