Literature DB >> 26595049

Hemodynamic Monitoring for the Evaluation and Treatment of Shock: What Is the Current State of the Art?

Eric M Suess1, Michael R Pinsky1.   

Abstract

Hemodynamic monitoring has become a fundamental and ubiquitous, if not defining, aspect of critical care medicine practice. Modern monitoring techniques have changed significantly over the past few years and are now able to rapidly identify shock states earlier, define the etiology, and monitor the response to therapies. Many of these techniques are now minimally invasive or noninvasive. Basic hemodynamic monitoring and evaluation usually includes a focused physical examination and static hemodynamic vital signs: temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure, and arterial hemoglobin oxygen saturation, typically measured with pulse photoplethysmography. When available, measurement of urinary output is often included. Advanced hemodynamic monitoring incorporates both noninvasive and invasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring. Noninvasive ultrasound has emerged as a fundamental hemodynamic evaluation tool and its use is now rapidly increasing. Invasive monitoring from arterial and central venous catheters, and occasionally pulmonary artery catheters, provides measurement of arterial pressure, intracardiac filling pressures, arterial and venous blood gases, and cardiac index. Minimally invasive and noninvasive measure of arterial pressure and cardiac output are also possible and often remain as accurate as invasive measures. Importantly, such advanced monitoring provides the foundation for goal-directed therapies for the treatment of shock. When coupled with functional hemodynamic monitoring analyses, these measures markedly extend the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of all monitoring modalities by defining preload reserve, vasomotor tone, cardiac performance, and tissue perfusion. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26595049     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1069-3424            Impact factor:   3.119


  4 in total

1.  Wireless, non-invasive, wearable device for continuous remote monitoring of hemodynamic parameters in a swine model of controlled hemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  Dean Nachman; Keren Constantini; Gal Poris; Linn Wagnert-Avraham; S David Gertz; Romi Littman; Eli Kabakov; Arik Eisenkraft; Yftach Gepner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review.

Authors:  Paolo Aseni; Stefano Orsenigo; Enrico Storti; Marco Pulici; Sergio Arlati
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2019-10-23

3.  A Bayesian Network Analysis of the Diagnostic Process and Its Accuracy to Determine How Clinicians Estimate Cardiac Function in Critically Ill Patients: Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Thomas Kaufmann; José Castela Forte; Bart Hiemstra; Marco A Wiering; Marco Grzegorczyk; Anne H Epema; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2019-10-30

4.  Airway Pressure Release Ventilation Mode Improves Circulatory and Respiratory Function in Patients After Cardiopulmonary Bypass, a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Huiqing Ge; Ling Lin; Ying Xu; Peifeng Xu; Kailiang Duan; Qing Pan; Kejing Ying
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.