Literature DB >> 26594877

A familiarity disadvantage for remembering specific images of faces.

Regine G M Armann1, Rob Jenkins1, A Mike Burton1.   

Abstract

Familiar faces are remembered better than unfamiliar faces. Furthermore, it is much easier to match images of familiar than unfamiliar faces. These findings could be accounted for by quantitative differences in the ease with which faces are encoded. However, it has been argued that there are also some qualitative differences in familiar and unfamiliar face processing. Unfamiliar faces are held to rely on superficial, pictorial representations, whereas familiar faces invoke more abstract representations. Here we present 2 studies that show, for 1 task, an advantage for unfamiliar faces. In recognition memory, viewers are better able to reject a new picture, if it depicts an unfamiliar face. This rare advantage for unfamiliar faces supports the notion that familiarity brings about some representational changes, and further emphasizes the idea that theoretical accounts of face processing should incorporate familiarity. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26594877     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  4 in total

1.  Choosing face: The curse of self in profile image selection.

Authors:  David White; Clare A M Sutherland; Amy L Burton
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-04-14

2.  Face masks affect emotion categorisation, age estimation, recognition, and gender classification from faces.

Authors:  Hoo Keat Wong; Alejandro J Estudillo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-10-08

3.  Feature instructions improve face-matching accuracy.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  How robust is familiar face recognition? A repeat detection study of more than 1000 faces.

Authors:  Angus F Chapman; Hannah Hawkins-Elder; Tirta Susilo
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.963

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.