Literature DB >> 26594700

The role of ecotypic variation and the environment on biomass and nitrogen in a dominant prairie grass.

Meredith L Mendola, Sara G Baer, Loretta C Johnson, Brian R Maricle.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the relative strength of evolution and the environment on a phenotype is required to predict species responses to environmental change and decide where to source plant material for ecological restoration. This information is critically needed for dominant species that largely determine the productivity of the central U.S. grassland. We established a reciprocal common garden experiment across a longitudinal gradient to test whether ecotypic variation interacts with the environment to affect growth and nitrogen (N) storage in a dominant grass. We predicted plant growth would increase from west to east, corresponding with increasing precipitation, but differentially among ecotypes due to local adaptation in all ecotypes and a greater range of growth response in ecotypes originating from west to east. We quantified aboveground biomass, root biomass, belowground net primary production (BNPP), root C:N ratio, and N storage in roots of three ecotypes of Andropogon gerardii collected from and reciprocally planted in central Kansas, eastern Kansas, and s6uthern Illinois. Only the ecotype from the most mesic region (southern Illinois) exhibited more growth from west to east. There was evidence for local adaptation in the southern Illinois ecotype by means of the local vs. foreign contrast within a site and the home vs. away contrast when growth in southern Illinois was compared to the most distant 'site in central Kansas. Root biomass of the eastern Kansas ecotype was higher at home than at either away site. The ecotype from the driest region, central Kansas, exhibited the least response across the environmental gradient, resulting in a positive relationship between the range of biomass response and precipitation in ecotype region of origin. Across all sites, ecotypes varied in root C:N ratio (highest in the driest-origin ecotype) and N storage in roots (highest in the most mesic-origin ecotype). The low and limited range of biomass, higher C:N ratio of roots, and lower N storage in the central Kansas ecotype relative to the southern Illinois ecotype suggests that introducing ecotypes of A. gerardii from much drier regions into highly mesic prairie would reduce productivity and alter belowground ecosystem processes under a wide range of conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26594700     DOI: 10.1890/14-1492.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  4 in total

1.  Bacterial but Not Fungal Rhizosphere Community Composition Differ among Perennial Grass Ecotypes under Abiotic Environmental Stress.

Authors:  Abigail Kamke; Kaitlyn Ward; Soumyadev Sarkar; Aoesta K Rudick; Sara G Baer; QingHong Ran; Brandi Feehan; Shiva Thapa; Lauren Anderson; Matthew Galliart; Ari Jumpponen; Loretta Johnson; Sonny T M Lee
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-04-20

2.  Are local plants the best for ecosystem restoration? It depends on how you analyze the data.

Authors:  Anna Bucharova; Walter Durka; Norbert Hölzel; Johannes Kollmann; Stefan Michalski; Oliver Bossdorf
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Climate variability supersedes grazing to determine the anatomy and physiology of a dominant grassland species.

Authors:  Seton Bachle; Jesse B Nippert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Intraspecific variation of a dominant grass and local adaptation in reciprocal garden communities along a US Great Plains' precipitation gradient: implications for grassland restoration with climate change.

Authors:  Loretta C Johnson; Jacob T Olsen; Hannah Tetreault; Angel DeLaCruz; Johnny Bryant; Theodore J Morgan; Mary Knapp; Nora M Bello; Sara G Baer; Brian R Maricle
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 5.183

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.