Literature DB >> 26594113

Antiproliferative effects of aspirin and diclofenac against the growth of cancer and fibroblast cells: In vitro comparative study.

Marwan S M Al-Nimer1, Huda G Hameed2, Majid M Mahmood3.   

Abstract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit the growth of several cancer cell lines. The aim of this study is to compare the cytotoxic effect of aspirin with diclofenac on the growth of HeLa cell, mammary cell carcinoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and fibroblast cell lines in the culture media. The cells are cultured in RPMI-1640 culture media supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum and antibiotics. Aspirin (5 mg/well) and diclofenac (0.625 mg/well) significantly inhibit the growth of HeLa, rhabdomyosarcoma and fibroblast cells. The cytotoxic effect of aspirin against rhabdomyosarcoma is significantly (p < 0.001) higher than that of diclofenac with a potency approximated 2.6. It concludes that aspirin and diclofenac inhibit the growth of fibroblast and cancer cell by inhibiting the up-regulation of cyclooxygenases enzymes in cancer cells. Aspirin is more effective than diclofenac against the growth of rhabdomyosarcoma cell line.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticancer; Aspirin; Cancer cells; Diclofenac; In vitro

Year:  2015        PMID: 26594113      PMCID: PMC4605905          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2015.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Pharm J        ISSN: 1319-0164            Impact factor:   4.330


Introduction

Regular uses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may reduce the risk of cancers of colon, breast, lung and ovary (Cuzick et al., 2009; Rothwell et al., 2012; Wernli et al., 2008). Experimental studies demonstrated that diclofenac inhibits the growth of tumor xenografts (Mayorek et al., 2010; Moody et al., 2010) as well as the proliferation of cancer cell in a concentration dependent manner (Smirnova et al., 2012). Diclofenac inhibits the growth of melanoma cell by increasing the cellular level of reactive oxygen species due to inhibition the activity of superoxide dismutase enzyme in mitochondria (Albano et al., 2013). Aspirin induced apoptosis and inhibits the proliferation of HeLa cells in a concentration dependent manner by a mechanism related to the inhibition of the proto-oncogene (ErbB2) downstream cell survival signaling pathways (Xiang et al., 2010). Aspirin interferes with the pathways of the proliferation rhabdomyosarcoma cells by inhibiting the induction of the matrix metalloproteinase enzyme activity (Ito et al., 2004). Recently, Siddesha et al. (2014) demonstrated that aspirin inhibits the migration of mouse cardiac fibroblast by attenuating the level of interleukin-18, an interleukin involved in different pathways that ultimately lead to reduce the migration of fibroblast and reducing fibrosis. In one study, aspirin reduced the breast cell line KM22 adhesion to human umbilical vein endothelial cell while diclofenac failed to demonstrate that effect (Bischofs et al., 2012). The rational for doing this study is that aspirin or diclofenac exerts a specific inhibitory action against the proliferation of cells that links to its selectivity against cyclooxygenases enzymes. This study aimed to compare the inhibitory effect aspirin and diclofenac (non-selective cyclooxygenases enzyme inhibitors) on the growth of three different cancer cell line and fibroblast.

Materials and methods

This study was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology in the College of Medicine incorporation with National Center of Cancer Research at Al-Mustansiriya University, Baghdad, Iraq during 2014. The study was approved by the Institutional Scientific Committee at the College of Medicine.

Cell Culture treatment and viability

HeLa, human rhabdomyosarcoma, mammary (AMN3) adenocarcinoma and primary rat embryo fibroblast cell lines (provided from The National Center of Cancer Research in Baghdad, Iraq) were maintained in RPMI-1640 media with 5% fetal calf serum. All cultures were maintained in medium supplemented with 0.5% ampicillin and 0.5% streptomycin in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Several trials of cell reactivation are done in order to obtain a monolayer cells in a specific falcon (volume 25 ml) which can be adjusted under the microscope to look for the presence of monolayer cells. Once the growth of monolayer cells has been formed, the old growth media discarded, washed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) buffer once, add 0.5–1 ml Trypsin-versin solution, then add 10 ml sterile growth media (supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum. Then the dispersed cells transferred into a sterile microplate. A total volume of 200 μl cells suspension is transferred into the wells of the microplate, incubated at 37 °C for 24 h to achieve a monolayer cells growth. The cells were plated at 1 × 105 cells per well in 200 μl of complete culture medium containing aspirin (5 mg) or diclofenac (0.625 mg) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The concentration of aspirin that used in this study amounted 8 times of that of diclofenac in attempt to mimic the maximum tolerated therapeutic doses of these drugs. The sterilization of the herbal tea achieved by mechanical filtration (using 0.2 μm millipore filter device) prior to the addition. On the next day (i.e. after 24 h), the viability of cells was determined by the MTT assay. A 30 μl of prepared tetrazolium dye (3-[4,5-dimethylth-iazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazoliumbromide (5 mg/ml in phosphate buffer solution) was added to each well in a dark room (to avoid oxidation of the dye), and incubated for 2 h at 37.5 °C in the incubator. Then after, whole wells contents are discarded, 100 μl dimethyl sulfoxide added, shake the microtitre plate for 15 min by using horizontal shaker before recording the absorbance of each well at 540 nm by ELISA reader.

Statistical analysis

The results are expressed as number, percent and whenever possible as mean ± SD. The data are analyzed using Student’s t test (unpaired, two tailed) and the difference between percentages test taking the probability of ⩽0.05 is the lowest limit of significance.

Results

Aspirin significantly (p < 0.001) inhibits the growth of fibroblast cell (53.7% ± 6.3%) compared with un-treated cells (100 ± 23%) (Fig. 1). A significant (p < 0.001) inhibitory effect of aspirin against the growth of HeLa cell line is observed (17.0 ± 3.3%) compared with untreated cells (100 ± 18.5%) (Fig. 1). A non- significant (p > 0.05) cytotoxic effects of aspirin is observed (103.1 ± 28.7%) against rhabdomyosarcoma cell line compared with un-treated cell line (100.0 ± 18.5%) (Fig. 1). The growth of rhabdomyosarcoma cell line is significantly (p < 0.001) inhibited with aspirin (26.1 ± 10.6%) compared with un-treated cell line (100 ± 26.1%) (Fig. 1). As with aspirin, diclofenac has no significant effect against the growth of AMN3 mammary cell line compared with un-treated cell line (118.5 ± 25.9% versus 100 ± 18.5%, respectively). The significant effects of diclofenac against fibroblast, HeLa and rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines are inferior to that observed with aspirin (Fig. 2). The percents of fibroblast, HeLa and rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines growth decreased into 74.9 ± 10.8%, 21.2 ± 5.5% and 67.0 ± 25.3% respectively. The cytotoxic effect of aspirin against rhabdomyosarcoma is significantly (p < 0.001) higher than diclofenac sodium with a potency approximated 2.6 (26.1 ± 10.6% versus 67.0 ± 25.3%).
Figure 1

Effect of aspirin on the growth of different cell lines. The results are expressed as mean ± SD of each treatment (n = 8), ∗p < 0.001.

Figure 2

Effect of diclofenac on the growth of different cell lines. The results are expressed as mean ± SD of each treatment (n = 8), ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.02, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.

Discussion

Aspirin and diclofenac significantly inhibit the growth of HeLa, rhabdomyosarcoma and the fibroblast cell line. The inhibitory effects of aspirin are higher than diclofenac sodium that reached significant against rhabdomyosarcoma. This study shows that the inhibitory effect of aspirin on the growth of HeLa cells is in agreement with other study that showed aspirin potentiated the effect of the reversing (antitumor compound) at a concentration of 10 mmol/L (Qin et al., 2013) which is lower than the concentration of this study. Lee et al. (2008) suggested that the anti-proliferative effect of aspirin is due to the induction of the antitumor calpain via activation the caspase-3. Wang et al. (2002) reported an inhibition of HeLa cell growth by diclofenac sodium in a concentration higher than that reported in this study. Therefore, the cytotoxic effect of diclofenac may approximate the effect of aspirin if equal-concentrations are used. The significant differences between diclofenac and aspirin against the growth of rhabdomyosarcoma may be related to the cyclooxgenase expression as well as to the level of the matrix metalloproteinase enzymes of the cells (Ito et al., 2004; Dickens and Cripe, 2003). Reed et al. (2011) reported that celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, inhibits the formation of rhabdomyosarcoma colonies, and they linked this effect to the different mechanisms including inhibition of interleukin-6 induction and phosphorylation of STAT (Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription) protein signaling. The cytotoxic inhibitory effects of aspirin and diclofenac are related to their effects on cyclooxygenases enzymes −1 and −2 in which they show up-regulation expression in fibroblast (Abdou et al., 2014). Recently, a new pharmaceutical formula termed closed packed vesicle-diclofenac is developed. This pharmaceutical preparation can attack the fibroblast cells and deposited in these cells (Manca et al., 2013). Therefore, the difference between aspirin and diclofenac against the fibroblast cell growth may be related to the concentration of the drug that deposited in fibroblast cells. The results of NSAIDs on the mammary cell growth do not agree the previous reports that showed aspirin induced breast cancer apoptosis in presence of over-expression of Bcl-2 gene (Choi et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2012). Therefore, NSAIDs inhibit the growth of breast cell cancer in specific experimental models, otherwise, their cytotoxic effect is missed.

Conclusion

We conclude that aspirin and diclofenac inhibit the growth of fibroblast and cancer cell by inhibiting the up-regulation of cyclooxygenases enzymes in cancer cells.
  20 in total

1.  Synergistic effects of exemestane and aspirin on MCF-7 human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Li-Xia Hu; Ying-Ying Du; Ying Zhang; Yue-Yin Pan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2012

2.  Markers of mitochondrial dysfunction during the diclofenac-induced apoptosis in melanoma cell lines.

Authors:  Francesco Albano; Alessandro Arcucci; Giuseppina Granato; Simona Romano; Stefania Montagnani; Emmanuele De Vendittis; Maria Rosaria Ruocco
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 4.079

3.  Celecoxib inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation and suppresses cell migration and colony forming ability in rhabdomyosarcoma cells.

Authors:  Suzanne Reed; Huameng Li; Chenglong Li; Jiayuh Lin
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Effect of combined cyclooxygenase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase inhibition on human sarcoma xenografts.

Authors:  David S Dickens; Timothy P Cripe
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.289

5.  Diclofenac inhibits tumor growth in a murine model of pancreatic cancer by modulation of VEGF levels and arginase activity.

Authors:  Nina Mayorek; Nili Naftali-Shani; Myriam Grunewald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Immunohistochemical evaluation of COX-1 and COX-2 expression in keloid and hypertrophic scar.

Authors:  Asmaa G Abdou; Alaa H Maraee; Hala F Abd-Elsattar Saif
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.533

7.  Fibronectin-induced COX-2 mediates MMP-2 expression and invasiveness of rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Hiromichi Ito; Mark Duxbury; Eric Benoit; Robert S Farivar; James Gardner-Thorpe; Michael J Zinner; Stanley W Ashley; Edward E Whang
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Acetylsalicylic acid inhibits IL-18-induced cardiac fibroblast migration through the induction of RECK.

Authors:  Jalahalli M Siddesha; Anthony J Valente; Siva S V P Sakamuri; Jason D Gardner; Patrice Delafontaine; Makoto Noda; Bysani Chandrasekar
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 9.  Aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for cancer prevention: an international consensus statement.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Florian Otto; John A Baron; Powel H Brown; John Burn; Peter Greenwald; Janusz Jankowski; Carlo La Vecchia; Frank Meyskens; Hans Jörg Senn; Michael Thun
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Inverse association of NSAID use and ovarian cancer in relation to oral contraceptive use and parity.

Authors:  K J Wernli; P A Newcomb; J M Hampton; A Trentham-Dietz; K M Egan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

1.  Diclofenac induced apoptosis via altering PI3K/Akt/MAPK signaling axis in HCT 116 more efficiently compared to SW480 colon cancer cells.

Authors:  Elif Damla Arisan; Zehragül Ergül; Gülnihal Bozdağ; Özge Rencüzoğulları; Ajda Çoker-Gürkan; Pınar Obakan-Yerlikaya; Deniz Coşkun; Narçin Palavan-Ünsal
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Side effects of frequently used oral antidiabetics on wound healing in vitro.

Authors:  Ewa Klara Stuermer; M Besser; N Terberger; V Koester; H S Bachmann; A L Severing
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Do Platelets Inhibit the Effect of Aspirin on Cancer Cells?

Authors:  Neha Mehta; Sasikala Muthusamy; Alka Bhatia
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2015-07-04

Review 4.  Effects of Non-Opioid Analgesics on the Cell Membrane of Skin and Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Authors:  Natalia Janicka; Agnieszka Sałek; Magdalena Sawińska; Ernest Kuchar; Anna Wiela-Hojeńska; Katarzyna Karłowicz-Bodalska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Repositioning of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer Sub-Types.

Authors:  Medi Kori; Kazim Yalcin Arga; Adil Mardinoglu; Beste Turanli
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 6.  Unboxing the molecular modalities of mutagens in cancer.

Authors:  Smita Kumari; Sudhanshu Sharma; Dia Advani; Akanksha Khosla; Pravir Kumar; Rashmi K Ambasta
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.190

7.  Controlled and tuneable drug release from electrospun fibers and a non-invasive approach for cytotoxicity testing.

Authors:  G Piccirillo; D A Carvajal Berrio; A Laurita; A Pepe; B Bochicchio; K Schenke-Layland; S Hinderer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparison of metamizole and paracetamol effects on colonic anastomosis and fibroblast activities in Wistar rats.

Authors:  Eko Purnomo; Dwi Aris Agung Nugrahaningsih; Nunik Agustriani
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 9.  The Roles of Inflammation in Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars.

Authors:  Zheng-Cai Wang; Wan-Yi Zhao; Yangyang Cao; Yan-Qi Liu; Qihang Sun; Peng Shi; Jia-Qin Cai; Xiao Z Shen; Wei-Qiang Tan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Promising Hybrids Derived from S-Allylcysteine and NSAIDs Fragments against Colorectal Cancer: Synthesis, In-vitro Evaluation, Drug-Likeness and In-silico ADME/tox Studies.

Authors:  Angie Herrera-R; Wilson Castrillón; Manuel Pastrana; Andres F Yepes; Wilson Cardona-G
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.696

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.