Literature DB >> 26593871

Relationships between range access as monitored by radio frequency identification technology, fearfulness, and plumage damage in free-range laying hens.

K M Hartcher1, K A Hickey1, P H Hemsworth2, G M Cronin1, S J Wilkinson1, M Singh1.   

Abstract

Severe feather-pecking (SFP), a particularly injurious behaviour in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus), is thought to be negatively correlated with range use in free-range systems. In turn, range use is thought to be inversely associated with fearfulness, where fearful birds may be less likely to venture outside. However, very few experiments have investigated the proposed association between range use and fearfulness. This experiment investigated associations between range use (time spent outside), fearfulness, plumage damage, and BW. Two pens of 50 ISA Brown laying hens (n=100) were fitted with radio frequency identification (RFID) transponders (contained within silicone leg rings) at 26 weeks of age. Data were then collected over 13 days. A total of 95% of birds accessed the outdoor run more than once per day. Birds spent an average duration of 6.1 h outside each day over 11 visits per bird per day (51.5 min per visit). The top 15 and bottom 15 range users (n=30), as determined by the total time spent on the range over 13 days, were selected for study. These birds were tonic immobility (TI) tested at the end of the trial and were feather-scored and weighed after TI testing. Birds with longer TI durations spent less time outside (P=0.01). Plumage damage was not associated with range use (P=0.68). The small group sizes used in this experiment may have been conducive to the high numbers of birds utilising the outdoor range area. The RFID technology collected a large amount of data on range access in the tagged birds, and provides a potential means for quantitatively assessing range access in laying hens. The present findings indicate a negative association between fearfulness and range use. However, the proposed negative association between plumage damage and range use was not supported. The relationships between range use, fearfulness, and SFP warrant further research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fearfulness; free-range; plumage damage; radio frequency identification; range use

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26593871     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731115002463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  14 in total

1.  Uninhibited chickens: ranging behaviour impacts motor self-regulation in free-range broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus).

Authors:  Vitor Hugo Bessa Ferreira; Lorène Reiter; Karine Germain; Ludovic Calandreau; Vanessa Guesdon
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Individual Ranging Behaviour Patterns in Commercial Free-Range Layers as Observed through RFID Tracking.

Authors:  Hannah Larsen; Greg M Cronin; Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich; Carolynn L Smith; Paul H Hemsworth; Jean-Loup Rault
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Comparisons of management practices and farm design on Australian commercial layer and meat chicken farms: Cage, barn and free range.

Authors:  Angela Bullanday Scott; Mini Singh; Jenny-Ann Toribio; Marta Hernandez-Jover; Belinda Barnes; Kathryn Glass; Barbara Moloney; Amanda Lee; Peter Groves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Characterising Free-Range Layer Flocks Using Unsupervised Cluster Analysis.

Authors:  Terence Zimazile Sibanda; Mitchell Welch; Derek Schneider; Manisha Kolakshyapati; Isabelle Ruhnke
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Relationship between Range Use and Fearfulness in Free-Range Hens from Different Rearing Enrichments.

Authors:  Md Saiful Bari; Simon S Allen; Jarrod Mesken; Andrew M Cohen-Barnhouse; Dana L M Campbell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Assessing Activity and Location of Individual Laying Hens in Large Groups Using Modern Technology.

Authors:  Janice M Siegford; John Berezowski; Subir K Biswas; Courtney L Daigle; Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich; Carlos E Hernandez; Stefan Thurner; Michael J Toscano
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Ranging Behaviour of Commercial Free-Range Broiler Chickens 2: Individual Variation.

Authors:  Peta S Taylor; Paul H Hemsworth; Peter J Groves; Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich; Jean-Loup Rault
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Spatial Cognition and Range Use in Free-Range Laying Hens.

Authors:  Dana L M Campbell; Andrew C Talk; Ziyang A Loh; Tim R Dyall; Caroline Lee
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  A Framework to Assess the Impact of New Animal Management Technologies on Welfare: A Case Study of Virtual Fencing.

Authors:  Caroline Lee; Ian G Colditz; Dana L M Campbell
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-08-21

10.  Application of open field, tonic immobility, and attention bias tests to hens with different ranging patterns.

Authors:  Dana L M Campbell; Emily J Dickson; Caroline Lee
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.