| Literature DB >> 26593274 |
Mesay Hailu Dangisso1,2,3, Daniel Gemechu Datiko4,5, Bernt Lindtjørn1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the expansion of health services and community-based interventions in Ethiopia, limited evidence exists about the distribution of and access to health facilities and their relationship with the performance of tuberculosis (TB) control programmes. We aim to assess the geographical distribution of and physical accessibility to TB control services and their relationship with TB case notification rates (CNRs) and treatment outcome in the Sidama Zone, southern Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Africa; developing countries; health systems; population health; public health; tuberculosis control
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26593274 PMCID: PMC4655224 DOI: 10.3402/gha.v8.29443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Health Action ISSN: 1654-9880 Impact factor: 2.640
Fig. 1Geographic distribution of AFB microscopy services and areas within 10 km distance from the nearest TB diagnostic (AFB microscopy) facilities in the Sidama Zone, in 2003, 2010 and 2012.
Fig. 2Geographic distribution of DOTs services and areas within 10 km distance from the nearest TB treatment facilities in the Sidama Zone in 2003, 2010 and 2012.
Characteristics of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis cases during the active case-finding intervention (2011–2012) and prior period (2003–2010) in the Sidama Zone, southern Ethiopia
| Prior to active case-finding period, 2003–2010 | During active case-finding intervention, 2011–2012 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Characteristics of subjects | N (%) | CNRs/105 people | N (%) | CNRs/105 people |
| All cases | 14,630 (65) | 63 | 7,907 (35) | 117 |
| Gender | ||||
| Men | 8,113 (55.5) | 70 | 4,122 (52) | 122 |
| Women | 6,508 (45.5) | 57 | 3,785 (48) | 114 |
| Age | ||||
| 0–14 | 1,304 (8.9) | 11 | 552 (8.2) | 19 |
| 15–24 | 4,834 (33) | 113 | 2,182 (27.6) | 174 |
| 25–34 | 4,557 (31) | 149 | 2,404 (30.4) | 267 |
| 35–44 | 1,821 (12.4) | 99 | 1,190 (15.1) | 222 |
| 45–54 | 1,127 (7.7) | 104 | 877 (11.1) | 277 |
| 55–64 | 542 (3.7) | 93 | 379 (4.8) | 223 |
| 65+ | 309 (2.1) | 54 | 216 (2.7) | 130 |
| Residence | ||||
| Urban | 1,879 (12.8) | 148 | 569 (7.2) | 144 |
| Rural | 12,751 (87.2) | 59 | 7,338 (92.8) | 116 |
| Treatment outcomes | ||||
| Treatment success (cured or completed) | 11,284 (77) | NA | 7,262 (92) | NA |
| Died | 467 (3.2) | NA | 168 (2.1) | NA |
| Lost to follow-up | 1,742 (12) | NA | 192 (2.4) | NA |
| Transferred | 417 (2.9) | NA | 114 (1.4) | NA |
| Treatment failure | 56 (0.4) | NA | 21 (0.3) | NA |
| Unevaluated cases | 664 (4.5) | NA | 150 (1.9) | NA |
CNRs, case notification rates; NA, not applicable.
Fig. 3Distribution of distance from the nearest AFB facility (sputum microscopy service) and smear positive PTB case notification rates in the Sidama Zone, 2003 and 2012.
Fig. 4Areas within different distances from AFB (sputum smear microscopy) services and mean case notification rates of smear-positive PTB in the Sidama Zone, 2003–2012.
Multiple linear regression model of kebele level estimates for the relationship between the case notification rates of TB and accessibility, altitude, and population density in the Sidama Zone in southern Ethiopia, 2003–2012
| Variables | Beta | Standard error |
|
| Variance inflation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distance (accessibility to TB control facility) | −0.25 | 0.64 | −6.0 | <0.001 | 1.2 |
| Altitude | −0.28 | 0.01 | −7.3 | <0.001 | 1.03 |
| Population density | 0.21 | 0.01 | 5.02 | <0.001 | 1.19 |
Analysis was done using aggregated data at kebele level (n=563 kebeles), R-square=0.24, p-value for the model <0.001.
Multiple linear regression model for the relationship between proportion of patients with treatment success (completed or cured) and accessibility, altitude, and population density in the Sidama Zone in southern Ethiopia, 2003–2012
| Variables and time periods | Beta | Standard error |
|
| Variance inflation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distance (accessibility to TB control facility) | −0.27 | 0.32 | −6.39 | <0.001 | 1.2 |
| Altitude | −0.30 | 0.002 | −7.60 | <0.001 | 1.03 |
| Population density | 0.024 | 0.001 | −0.56 | 0.579 | 1.2 |
Analysis was done using aggregated data at kebele level (n=563 kebeles), R-square=0.17, p-value for the model <0.001.