Literature DB >> 26592654

Comparison of impedimetric detection of DNA hybridization on the various biosensors based on modified glassy carbon electrodes with PANHS and nanomaterials of RGO and MWCNTs.

Ali Benvidi1, Marzieh Dehghan Tezerjani2, Shahriar Jahanbani2, Mohammad Mazloum Ardakani2, Seyed Mohammad Moshtaghioun3.   

Abstract

In this research, we have developed lable free DNA biosensors based on modified glassy carbon electrodes (GCE) with reduced graphene oxide (RGO) and carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) for detection of DNA sequences. This paper compares the detection of BRCA1 5382insC mutation using independent glassy carbon electrodes (GCE) modified with RGO and MWCNTs. A probe (BRCA1 5382insC mutation detection (ssDNA)) was then immobilized on the modified electrodes for a specific time. The immobilization of the probe and its hybridization with the target DNA (Complementary DNA) were performed under optimum conditions using different electrochemical techniques such as cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The proposed biosensors were used for determination of complementary DNA sequences. The non-modified DNA biosensor (1-pyrenebutyric acid-N- hydroxysuccinimide ester (PANHS)/GCE), revealed a linear relationship between ∆Rct and logarithm of the complementary target DNA concentration ranging from 1.0×10(-16)molL(-1) to 1.0×10(-10)mol L(-1) with a correlation coefficient of 0.992, for DNA biosensors modified with multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) wider linear range and lower detection limit were obtained. For ssDNA/PANHS/MWCNTs/GCE a linear range 1.0×10(-17)mol L(-1)-1.0×10(-10)mol L(-1) with a correlation coefficient of 0.993 and for ssDNA/PANHS/RGO/GCE a linear range from 1.0×10(-18)mol L(-1) to 1.0×10(-10)mol L(-1) with a correlation coefficient of 0.985 were obtained. In addition, the mentioned biosensors were satisfactorily applied for discriminating of complementary sequences from noncomplementary sequences, so the mentioned biosensors can be used for the detection of BRCA1-associated breast cancer.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1- pyrenebutyric acid-N- hydroxysuccinimide ester (PANHS); Breast cancer; DNA-biosensor; Immobilization; Reduced graphene oxide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26592654     DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.10.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Talanta        ISSN: 0039-9140            Impact factor:   6.057


  9 in total

1.  Impedimetric PSA aptasensor based on the use of a glassy carbon electrode modified with titanium oxide nanoparticles and silk fibroin nanofibers.

Authors:  Ali Benvidi; Maryam Banaei; Marzieh Dehghan Tezerjani; Hosein Molahosseini; Shahriar Jahanbani
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 5.833

2.  Electrochemical Biosensor Using Nitrogen-Doped Graphene/Au Nanoparticles/DNAzyme for Ca2+ Determination.

Authors:  Zhixue Yu; Hui Wang; Yiguang Zhao; Fan Zhang; Xiangfang Tang; Benhai Xiong
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  A reagentless electrochemical immunosensor for sensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen based on the interface with redox probe-modified electron transfer wires and effectively immobilized antibody.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Luoxing Yang; Jie Pei; Yanzhang Tian; Jiyang Liu
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.545

4.  Electrochemical detection of urinary microRNAs via sulfonamide-bound antisense hybridisation.

Authors:  Daniel A Smith; Lucy J Newbury; Guido Drago; Timothy Bowen; James E Redman
Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 7.460

Review 5.  Non-Invasive Breast Cancer Diagnosis through Electrochemical Biosensing at Different Molecular Levels.

Authors:  Susana Campuzano; María Pedrero; José Manuel Pingarrón
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Review of Electrochemical DNA Biosensors for Detecting Food Borne Pathogens.

Authors:  Qiaoyun Wu; Yunzhe Zhang; Qian Yang; Ning Yuan; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Electrochemical Nanobiosensors for Detection of Breast Cancer Biomarkers.

Authors:  Veronika Gajdosova; Lenka Lorencova; Peter Kasak; Jan Tkac
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Recent advances and challenges in electrochemical biosensors for emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases.

Authors:  Shalini Menon; Manna Rachel Mathew; Sonia Sam; K Keerthi; K Girish Kumar
Journal:  J Electroanal Chem (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.464

Review 9.  A Methodical Review on the Applications and Potentialities of Using Nanobiosensors for Disease Diagnosis.

Authors:  Kingsley Eghonghon Ukhurebor; Robert Birundu Onyancha; Uyiosa Osagie Aigbe; Gladys Uk-Eghonghon; Rout George Kerry; Heri Septya Kusuma; Handoko Darmokoesoemo; Otolorin Adelaja Osibote; Vincent Aizebeoje Balogun
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.