Literature DB >> 26592528

Fragment-Based Discovery of Subtype-Selective Adenosine Receptor Ligands from Homology Models.

Anirudh Ranganathan1, Leigh A Stoddart2, Stephen J Hill2, Jens Carlsson3.   

Abstract

Fragment-based lead discovery (FBLD) holds great promise for drug discovery, but applications to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been limited by a lack of sensitive screening techniques and scarce structural information. If virtual screening against homology models of GPCRs could be used to identify fragment ligands, FBLD could be extended to numerous important drug targets and contribute to efficient lead generation. Access to models of multiple receptors may further enable the discovery of fragments that bind specifically to the desired target. To investigate these questions, we used molecular docking to screen >500 000 fragments against homology models of the A3 and A1 adenosine receptors (ARs) with the goal to discover A3AR-selective ligands. Twenty-one fragments with predicted A3AR-specific binding were evaluated in live-cell fluorescence-based assays; of eight verified ligands, six displayed A3/A1 selectivity, and three of these had high affinities ranging from 0.1 to 1.3 μM. Subsequently, structure-guided fragment-to-lead optimization led to the identification of a >100-fold-selective antagonist with nanomolar affinity from commercial libraries. These results highlight that molecular docking screening can guide fragment-based discovery of selective ligands even if the structures of both the target and antitarget receptors are unknown. The same approach can be readily extended to a large number of pharmaceutically important targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26592528     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  7 in total

1.  Structure-Based Screening of Uncharted Chemical Space for Atypical Adenosine Receptor Agonists.

Authors:  David Rodríguez; Saibal Chakraborty; Eugene Warnick; Steven Crane; Zhan-Guo Gao; Robert O'Connor; Kenneth A Jacobson; Jens Carlsson
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.100

2.  Breakthrough in GPCR Crystallography and Its Impact on Computer-Aided Drug Design.

Authors:  Antonella Ciancetta; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

Review 3.  Fluorescent ligands: Bringing light to emerging GPCR paradigms.

Authors:  Mark Soave; Stephen J Briddon; Stephen J Hill; Leigh A Stoddart
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of GPCR models?

Authors:  Jon Kapla; Ismael Rodríguez-Espigares; Flavio Ballante; Jana Selent; Jens Carlsson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  A Non-imaging High Throughput Approach to Chemical Library Screening at the Unmodified Adenosine-A3 Receptor in Living Cells.

Authors:  Maria Augusta Arruda; Leigh A Stoddart; Karolina Gherbi; Stephen J Briddon; Barrie Kellam; Stephen J Hill
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 6.  Recent Advances and Applications of Molecular Docking to G Protein-Coupled Receptors.

Authors:  Damian Bartuzi; Agnieszka A Kaczor; Katarzyna M Targowska-Duda; Dariusz Matosiuk
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Performance of virtual screening against GPCR homology models: Impact of template selection and treatment of binding site plasticity.

Authors:  Mariama Jaiteh; Ismael Rodríguez-Espigares; Jana Selent; Jens Carlsson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.