Literature DB >> 26592438

Comparing the mechanical properties of the porcine knee meniscus when hydrated in saline versus synovial fluid.

Emily H Lakes1, Courtney L Kline2, Peter S McFetridge1, Kyle D Allen3.   

Abstract

As research progresses to find a suitable knee meniscus replacement, accurate in vitro testing becomes critical for feasibility and comparison studies of mechanical integrity. Within the knee, the meniscus is bathed in synovial fluid, yet the most common hydration fluid in laboratory testing is phosphate buffered saline (PBS). PBS is a relatively simple salt solution, while synovial fluid is a complex non-Newtonian fluid with multiple lubricating factors. As such, PBS may interact with meniscal tissue differently than synovial fluid, and thus, the hydration fluid may be an important factor in obtaining accurate results during in vitro testing. To evaluate these effects, medial porcine menisci were used to evaluate tissue mechanics in tension (n=11) and compression (n=15). In all tests, two samples from the same meniscus were taken, where one sample was hydrated in PBS and the other was hydrated in synovial fluid. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the mean mechanical properties of samples tested in PBS compared to synovial fluid; however, compressive testing revealed the variability between samples was significantly reduced if samples were tested in synovial fluid. For example, the compressive Young׳s Modulus was 12.69±7.49MPa in PBS versus 12.34±4.27MPa in synovial fluid. These results indicate testing meniscal tissue in PBS will largely not affect the mean value of the mechanical properties, but performing compression testing in synovial fluid may provide more consistent results between samples and assist in reducing sample numbers in some experiments.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mechanical testing; Meniscus; Phosphate buffered saline; Synovial fluid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26592438     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  3 in total

1.  Considerations for translation of tissue engineered fibrocartilage from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Ryan P Donahue; Erik A Gonzalez-Leon; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos Athanasiou
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Mechanisms of energy dissipation and relationship with tissue composition in human meniscus.

Authors:  A Morejon; A M A Mantero; T M Best; A R Jackson; F Travascio
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 3.  Six-Month Outcomes of Clinically Relevant Meniscal Injury in a Large-Animal Model.

Authors:  Sonia Bansal; Kyle D Meadows; Liane M Miller; Kamiel S Saleh; Jay M Patel; Brendan D Stoeckl; Elisabeth A Lemmon; Michael W Hast; Miltiadis H Zgonis; Carla R Scanzello; Dawn M Elliott; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.