Literature DB >> 26590437

Value of Post-Licensure Data on Benefits and Risks of Vaccination to Inform Vaccine Policy: The Example of Rotavirus Vaccines.

Umesh D Parashar1, Margaret M Cortese2, Daniel C Payne2, Benjamin Lopman2, Catherine Yen2, Jacqueline E Tate2.   

Abstract

In 1999, the first rhesus-human reassortant rotavirus vaccine licensed in the U.S. was withdrawn within a year of its introduction after it was linked with intussusception at a rate of ~1 excess case per 10,000 vaccinated infants. While clinical trials of 60,000-70,000 infants of each of the two current live oral rotavirus vaccines, RotaTeq (RV5) and Rotarix (RV1), did not find an association with intussusception, post-licensure studies have documented a risk in several high and middle income countries, at a rate of ~1-6 excess cases per 100,000 vaccinated infants. However, considering this low risk against the large health benefits of vaccination that have been observed in many countries, including in countries with a documented vaccine-associated intussusception risk, policy makers and health organizations around the world continue to support the routine use of RV1 and RV5 in national infant immunization programs. Because the risk and benefit data from affluent settings may not be directly applicable to developing countries, further characterization of any associated intussusception risk following rotavirus vaccination as well as the health benefits of vaccination is desirable for low income settings.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26590437     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  7 in total

Review 1.  Decreased performance of live attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccines in low-income settings: causes and contributing factors.

Authors:  Daniel E Velasquez; Umesh Parashar; Baoming Jiang
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 5.217

2.  Safety monitoring of ROTAVAC vaccine and etiological investigation of intussusception in India: study protocol.

Authors:  Samarasimha Reddy; Nayana P Nair; Sidhartha Giri; Venkata Raghava Mohan; Jacqueline E Tate; Umesh D Parashar; Mohan D Gupte; Rashmi Arora; Gagandeep Kang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Assessment of risk of intussusception after pilot rollout of rotavirus vaccine in the Indian public health system.

Authors: 
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in France: A Simulation and Modeling Analysis.

Authors:  Edouard Ledent; Hugo Arlegui; Hubert Buyse; Peter Basile; Naveen Karkada; Nicolas Praet; Gaëlle Nachbaur
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.807

5.  Epidemiology of intussusception before and after rotavirus vaccine introduction in Fiji.

Authors:  Felisita Tupou Ratu; Rita Reyburn; Evelyn Tuivaga; Asena Tuiketei; Kylie Jenkins; Kim Mulholland; Adam Jenney; Fiona Russell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Benefit-Risk Assessment of Vaccines. Part II: Proposal Towards Consolidated Standards of Reporting Quantitative Benefit-Risk Models Applied to Vaccines (BRIVAC).

Authors:  Hugo Arlegui; Kaatje Bollaerts; Vincent Bauchau; Gaëlle Nachbaur; Bernard Bégaud; Nicolas Praet
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Quantitative Benefit-Risk Models Used for Rotavirus Vaccination: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hugo Arlegui; Gaëlle Nachbaur; Nicolas Praet; Bernard Bégaud
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.835

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.