Literature DB >> 26590134

Kinship analysis: assessment of related vs unrelated based on defined pedigrees.

Stefania Turrina1, Melissa Ferrian2, Stefano Caratti2, Emanuela Cosentino2, Domenico De Leo2.   

Abstract

The study aimed at evaluating whether the adoption of enlarged batteries of STR markers in kinship analysis may provide LR values suitable for discrimination of relatives from non-relatives, in comparison to conventionally used STR panels. The presence of LD among some loci and its effects on LR values were also assessed. Three hundred pairs of related and unrelated individuals, each separated from 1-3 generations and residing in North Italy were genotyped with the Investigator HDplex STR kit (Qiagen), AmpFlSTR Identifiler (Applied Biosystems), and PowerPlex Fusion System (Promega). Loci and alleles shared between each pair and within groups of relatives were compared. Also, combined LR values with and without loci in LD, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each commercial kit and their combinations. Full siblings displayed the largest number of shared loci and alleles, with a proportion of LR ≥ 10 results significantly higher than other degrees of relatedness and, consequently, with the lowest percentage of inconclusive and false negative results. Only minor differences were detected in the combined LR distributions, after including or omitting loci in LD. However, these became only appreciable when analyzing more distant relative pairs.The implementation of additional STRs into the LR calculation allowed a complete and robust discrimination between relatives and non-relatives only for full siblings, by removing the typical uncertainty of the "grey zone", while this was not achieved among other degrees of relatedness. Furthermore, the presence of loci in LD seems to not significantly affect LR distributions within each generation.

Keywords:  Grey zone; Kinship analysis; Likelihood ratio; Short tandem repeats

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26590134     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-015-1290-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  27 in total

1.  Better tools are needed for parentage and kinship studies.

Authors:  Robert E Wenk; Francis A Chiafari; Jed Gorlin; Herbert F Polesky
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Combining results of forensic STR kits: HDplex validation including allelic association and linkage testing with NGM and Identifiler loci.

Authors:  Antoinette A Westen; Hinda Haned; Laurens J W Grol; Joyce Harteveld; Kristiaan J van der Gaag; Peter de Knijff; Titia Sijen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  A grey zone approach for evaluation of 15 short tandem repeat loci in sibship analysis: a pilot study in Indian subjects.

Authors:  Rajiv I Giroti; Sunita Verma; Kulwant Singh; Rohit Malik; Indu Talwar
Journal:  J Forensic Leg Med       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 1.614

4.  "Paterniplex", a highly discriminative decaplex STR multiplex tailored for investigating special problems in paternity testing.

Authors:  Thomas Betz; Uta-Dorothee Immel; Manfred Kleiber; Michael Klintschar
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Global population variability in Qiagen Investigator HDplex STRs.

Authors:  C Phillips; L Fernandez-Formoso; M Gelabert-Besada; M García-Magariños; J Amigo; A Carracedo; M V Lareu
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 4.882

6.  Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Investigator HDplex markers: allele frequencies and mutational events in a North Italian population.

Authors:  Stefania Turrina; Melissa Ferrian; Stefano Caratti; Domenico De Leo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Analysis of linkage and linkage disequilibrium for syntenic STRs on 12 chromosomes.

Authors:  Weiwei Wu; Honglei Hao; Qiuling Liu; Xian Han; Yeda Wu; Jianding Cheng; Dejian Lu
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Determination of sibship by PCR-amplified short tandem repeat analysis in Taiwan.

Authors:  C H Tzeng; J Y Lyou; Y R Chen; H Y Hu; J S Lin; S Y Wang; J C Lee
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  A novel strategy for sibship determination in trio sibling model.

Authors:  James Chun-I Lee; Yen-Yang Lin; Li-Chin Tsai; Chun-Yen Lin; Tsun-Ying Huang; Pao-Ching Chu; Yu-Jen Yu; Adrian Linacre; Hsing-Mei Hsieh
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.351

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comments on "Kinship analysis: assessment of related vs unrelated based on defined pedigrees" by S. Turrina et al.

Authors:  Andreas O Tillmar; Daniel Kling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Combined effects of multiple linked loci on pairwise sibling tests.

Authors:  Tomonori Tamura; Motoki Osawa; Yu Kakimoto; Eriko Ochiai; Takanori Suzuki; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.686

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.