| Literature DB >> 26589843 |
Katsunori Fukutake1, Takao Ishiwatari2, Hiroshi Takahashi3, Kazuaki Tsuchiya4, Yoichiro Okubo5, Minoru Shinozaki6, Naobumi Tochigi7, Megumi Wakayama8, Tetsuo Nemoto9, Kazutoshi Shibuya10,11, Akihito Wada12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ossification in the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) correlates with changes of enthesis during the early stages of development, but this issue remains controversial, as little is known regarding the details of this process. The aim of the present study was to elucidate part of the ossification mechanism. Thus, in the present study, we observed and evaluated minute ossifications in the PLL that did not exhibit symptoms of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26589843 PMCID: PMC4654799 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-015-0440-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Fig. 1Methods of trimming the specimens. These figures show the trimmed line. The specimens were trimmed 1 cm ventrally from the dorsal vertebra and 1 cm laterally from the midline of the cross-section
Fig. 2Measuring methods used to analyze the two-dimensional tomogram images. This figure shows the measuring methods utilized to analyze the two-dimensional tomogram images using image analysis software, showing a slice of the two-dimensional tomogram images as an example. Red area: high-density area with a density equal to or greater than that of vertebral bone trabeculae in an area equal to or greater than 0.1 mm2. Yellow area: the soft tissue behind vertebrae as the PLL. The boundary between the PLL and the annular fibrosus of the intervertebral disc were defined as the line connecting the top of the rim of the upper and lower vertebrae
Age distribution of the subjects
| Age | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30–39 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 40–49 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| 50–59 | 7 | 4 | 11 |
| 60–69 | 22 | 9 | 31 |
| 70–79 | 21 | 10 | 31 |
| 80–89 | 13 | 6 | 19 |
| 90–99 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Fig. 3A total of 48 cases with high-density areas in the PLL. The number represents the serial number of the present study
Fig. 4a–c Representative case of the continuous posterior-annular fibrosus type. a CT image: A trabecular bone structure was frequently observed within the high-density area. b Three dimensional reconstruction image: The high-density area was observed as an elongation of the rim of the vertebral body. c Pathological image: These cases typically involved a projection with continuity with both marrow and the cortex of the bone to the enthesis. Calcification was observed in the connective tissue around the projection
Fig. 5a–c Representative case of the isolated posterior-annular fibrosus type. a CT image: The high-density area was interpreted as a collection of small lesions instead of a single high-density area. b Three dimensional reconstruction image: The high-density area was present at isolated intervertebral levels and had no continuity to the vertebra. c Pathological image: These cases typically showed the prolapse of degenerated nucleus pulposus with previous rupturing of annular fibrosus of the intervertebral disc, accompanied by fibrosis, calcification and/or ossification
Fig. 6a–c Representative case of the posterior-vertebral type. a CT image: The ligament remained nearly unchanged with regard to thickness and surface area. Localized high-density areas were observed along the longitudinal axis in the PLL. b Three dimensional reconstruction image: High-density areas were without continuity with the vertebra. c Pathological image: This type showed isolated calcifying foci characterized by a linear-shaped, stereoscopically plate-shaped calcification and/or ossification in the PLL developed just behind the vertebral body
Micro-focus X-ray CT image analysis and histological examination
| Case | Micro-focus X-ray CT image analysis | Histological findings | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Age | Sex | Proportion of HDA (%) | Type of HDA | Rate of ossification in total area of calcification (%) | ||
| C-PAF | I-PAF | PV | |||||
| 1 | 89 | F | 32.39 | + | - | - | 98.8 |
| 4 | 81 | M | 2.31 | + | - | + | 98.7 |
| 5 | 74 | F | 50.84 | + | - | - | 99.8 |
| 6 | 85 | M | 9.31 | - | + | + | 0 |
| 9 | 82 | M | 5.26 | + | - | + | 0 |
| 10 | 70 | F | 0.18 | + | - | - | 0 |
| 14 | 71 | M | 6.43 | - | + | + | 0 |
| 15 | 74 | M | 6.04 | + | - | + | 0 |
| 17 | 77 | M | 1.78 | - | - | + | 0 |
| 19 | 89 | F | 2.72 | - | - | + | 65.2 |
| 20 | 65 | M | 5.35 | - | + | - | 0 |
| 22 | 69 | F | 0.08 | - | + | - | 0 |
| 23 | 68 | F | 0.36 | + | - | + | 97.4 |
| 33 | 67 | F | 1.11 | + | - | - | 0 |
| 34 | 78 | M | 5.4 | - | + | + | 0 |
| 39 | 74 | M | 7.19 | + | - | + | 72.9 |
| 41 | 75 | M | 8.22 | + | - | + | 39.3 |
| 42 | 61 | F | 10.91 | + | - | + | 98.1 |
| 43 | 78 | F | 10.88 | - | + | - | 0 |
| 47 | 79 | M | 2.1 | - | - | + | 50.8 |
| 50 | 80 | F | 11.73 | + | - | - | 0 |
| 52 | 74 | M | 2.26 | - | - | + | 0 |
| 56 | 81 | M | 2.52 | - | - | + | 0 |
| 57 | 70 | M | 0.11 | + | - | + | 78.9 |
| 58 | 59 | F | 8.27 | + | - | - | 0 |
| 59 | 64 | M | 1.89 | + | - | - | 99.1 |
| 61 | 83 | M | 3.3 | - | - | + | 6.3 |
| 62 | 41 | M | 0.29 | + | - | - | 0 |
| 66 | 61 | M | 1.69 | - | - | + | 0 |
| 67 | 62 | M | 0.54 | - | - | + | 0 |
| 69 | 84 | M | 8.57 | + | - | + | 81.7 |
| 70 | 78 | M | 1.13 | - | - | + | 0 |
| 73 | 81 | M | 0.64 | - | + | + | 0 |
| 80 | 82 | M | 3.03 | + | - | - | 87.9 |
| 84 | 61 | M | 2.79 | - | - | + | 33.7 |
| 85 | 68 | M | 0.09 | - | + | - | 0 |
| 86 | 57 | M | 4.04 | + | - | - | 99.6 |
| 88 | 52 | F | 4.82 | - | + | - | 4.1 |
| 91 | 61 | M | 1.87 | - | - | + | 0 |
| 92 | 76 | M | 9.58 | - | + | - | 89.9 |
| 93 | 74 | M | 1.38 | - | - | + | 0 |
| 94 | 77 | F | 25.45 | + | - | + | 99.5 |
| 95 | 49 | M | 4.51 | - | + | - | 27.4 |
| 98 | 58 | M | 1.44 | - | - | + | 26 |
| 99 | 83 | M | 3.19 | - | - | + | 0 |
| 100 | 77 | F | 0.15 | + | - | - | 44 |
| 101 | 89 | M | 4.28 | + | - | + | 53.9 |
| 102 | 86 | M | 38.51 | + | - | - | 96.6 |
HDA high-density area
C-PAF continuous posterior-annular fibrosus type
I-PAF isolated posterior-annular fibrosus type
PV posterior-vertebra type
Comparison between the group with no ossification and the group showing ossification (Mann–Whitney U-test)
| All cases | Ossification | r | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (+) | (-) | |||
| Number of cases | 103 | 48 | 55 | - |
| Age (years) | 68.5 | 72.4 | 65.1 |
|
| Sex (male %) | 67.0 | 70.8 | 63.6 | n.s. |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 21.4 | 22.1 | 20.8 | n.s. |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.8 | 6.1 | 5.5 |
|
| Diabetes (%) | 28.2 | 31.3 | 25.5 | n.s. |
| Malignant tumor (%) | 58.3 | 56.3 | 60.0 | n.s. |
BMI body mass index
Correlation between the proportion of ossification and/or calcification and putative predictive factors (Pearson correlation coefficient)
| Proportion of O/C | Age | BMI | HbA1c | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion of HDA | r | - | 0.265 | 0.062 | 0.294 |
| p | - | 0.007 | 0.548 | 0.004 | |
| Age | r | 0.265 | - | 0.105 | 0.053 |
| p | 0.007 | - | 0.311 | 0.607 | |
| BMI | r | 0.062 | 0.105 | - | 0.058 |
| p | 0.548 | 0.311 | - | 0.590 | |
| HbA1c | r | 0.294 | 0.053 | 0.058 | - |
| p | 0.004 | 0.607 | 0.590 | - |
O/C ossification and/of calcification
Examination of the morphological characteristics of the ossification, the posterior-annular fibrosus type, and the posterior-vertebral type (t-test)
| C-PAF | Other |
| I-PAF | Other |
| PV | Other |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Age (years) | 73.09 | 67.20 | 0.041 | 70.18 | 68.32 | 0.622 | 74.86 | 66.03 | 0.000 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 23.74 | 20.75 | 0.034 | 19.84 | 21.58 | 0.115 | 21.18 | 21.46 | 0.767 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.93 | 5.76 | 0.315 | 6.209 | 5.746 | 0.151 | 5.967 | 5.734 | 0.344 |
C-PAF continuous posterior-annular fibrosus type
I-PAF isolated posterior-annular fibrosus type
PV posterior-vertebra type
Fig. 7Mature bone tissue in isolated calcifying foci in the PLL. The posterior-vertebral type showing isolated calcifying foci in the PLL, which contained islets of mature bone tissue