Literature DB >> 26589498

Erratum to: What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies?

Kath Wright1, Su Golder2, Kate Lewis-Light3.   

Abstract

Year:  2015        PMID: 26589498      PMCID: PMC4654912          DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0128-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Rev        ISSN: 2046-4053


× No keyword cloud information.

Erratum

After publication of [1] it came to the authors’ attention that three percentage (%) symbols were missed upon publication of their manuscript. The incorrect statement present in the Abstract and Results is “The median number of unique studies was 9.09; while the range had a lowest value of 5.0 to the highest value of 33.0”. The correct statement is “The median % of unique studies was 9.09%; while the range had a lowest value of 5.0% to the highest value of 33.0%”. This has been updated in the original article.
  1 in total

1.  What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies?

Authors:  Kath Wright; Su Golder; Kate Lewis-Light
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.