Debra Umberson1, Mieke Beth Thomeer2, Kristi Williams3, Patricia A Thomas4, Hui Liu5. 1. Department of Sociology and Population Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin. umberson@prc.utexas.edu. 2. Department of Sociology, University of Alabama at Birmingham. 3. Department of Sociology, Ohio State University, Columbus. 4. Department of Sociology and Center on Aging and the Life Course, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. 5. Department of Sociology, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Prior U.S. population studies have found that childhood adversity influences the quality of relationships in adulthood, with emerging research suggesting that this association might be especially strong for black men. We theorize psychosocial and behavioral coping responses to early life adversity and how these responses may link early life adversity to strain in men's relationships with their indeterminate partners and children across the life course, with attention to possible racial variation in these experiences and implications for later life well-being. METHOD: We analyze in-depth interviews with 15 black men and 15 white men. We use qualitative analysis techniques to connect childhood experiences to psychosocial processes in childhood and behavioral coping strategies associated with relationship experiences throughout adulthood. RESULTS: Black men describe much stronger and more persistent childhood adversity than do white men. Findings further suggest that childhood adversity contributes to psychosocial processes (e.g., diminished sense of mastery) that may lead to ways of coping with adversity (e.g., self-medication) that are likely to contribute to relationship difficulties throughout the life span. DISCUSSION: A life course perspective directs attention to the early life origins of cumulative patterns of social disadvantage, patterns that extend to later life. Our findings suggest psychosocial and behavioral pathways through which early life adversity may constrain and strain men's relationships, possibly contributing to racial inequality in family relationships across the life span.
OBJECTIVES: Prior U.S. population studies have found that childhood adversity influences the quality of relationships in adulthood, with emerging research suggesting that this association might be especially strong for black men. We theorize psychosocial and behavioral coping responses to early life adversity and how these responses may link early life adversity to strain in men's relationships with their indeterminate partners and children across the life course, with attention to possible racial variation in these experiences and implications for later life well-being. METHOD: We analyze in-depth interviews with 15 black men and 15 white men. We use qualitative analysis techniques to connect childhood experiences to psychosocial processes in childhood and behavioral coping strategies associated with relationship experiences throughout adulthood. RESULTS: Black men describe much stronger and more persistent childhood adversity than do white men. Findings further suggest that childhood adversity contributes to psychosocial processes (e.g., diminished sense of mastery) that may lead to ways of coping with adversity (e.g., self-medication) that are likely to contribute to relationship difficulties throughout the life span. DISCUSSION: A life course perspective directs attention to the early life origins of cumulative patterns of social disadvantage, patterns that extend to later life. Our findings suggest psychosocial and behavioral pathways through which early life adversity may constrain and strain men's relationships, possibly contributing to racial inequality in family relationships across the life span.
Authors: Kenneth F Ferraro; Ya-Ping Su; Randall J Gretebeck; David R Black; Stephen F Badylak Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Marino A Bruce; Tanganyika Wilder; Keith C Norris; Bettina M Beech; Derek M Griffith; Roland J Thorpe Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Min Hee Kim; Gabriel L Schwartz; Justin S White; M Maria Glymour; Sean F Reardon; Kiarri N Kershaw; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Daniel F Collin; Pushkar P Inamdar; Guangyi Wang; Rita Hamad Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 11.613
Authors: Patricia A Thomas; Monica M Williams-Farrelly; Madison R Sauerteig; Kenneth F Ferraro Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 4.942
Authors: Mei Ling Ong; Eric T Klopack; Sierra Carter; Ronald L Simons; Steven R H Beach Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 4.614