Literature DB >> 26589236

Stand up: comparison of two electrical screed levelling machines to reduce the work demands for the knees and low back among floor layers.

Steven Visser1, Henk F van der Molen1,2, P Paul F M Kuijer1, Judith K Sluiter1, Monique H W Frings-Dresen1.   

Abstract

Electrical screed levelling machines are developed to reduce kneeling and trunk flexion of sand-cement-bound screed floor layers. An observational intervention study among 10 floor layers was performed to assess the differences between a self-propelled and a manually moved machine. The outcome measures were work demands, production time, perceived load, discomfort and applicability. Compared to the self-propelled machine, the duration of kneeling (∆13 min; p = 0.003) and trunk flexion (∆12 min; p < 0.001) was shorter using the manually moved machine, and the duration of pushing and pulling increased (∆39 min; p < 0.001). No significant or relevant differences were found for production time, perceived load and discomfort. Nine out of ten floor layers found the manually moved machine applicable and three out of ten found the self-propelled machine applicable. When compared with the traditional manner of floor laying, both electrical machines reduced the exposure towards kneeling and trunk flexion. Practitioner Summary: Electrical machines may help to reduce high physical work demands on floor layers. A manually moved machine is better applicable for the installation of screed floors in residences with smaller floor areas. A self-propelled machine is better applicable on large floor areas with a minimum width of 4 m.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ergonomic measures; floor layers; knees; low back; work demands

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26589236     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1122233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

Review 1.  Modifiable risk factors in knee osteoarthritis: treatment implications.

Authors:  Tsvetoslav Georgiev; Alexander Krasimirov Angelov
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  Occupational Exposure to Knee Loading and the Risk of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jos Verbeek; Christina Mischke; Rachel Robinson; Sharea Ijaz; Paul Kuijer; Arthur Kievit; Anneli Ojajärvi; Kaisa Neuvonen
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2017-02-22

3.  Occupational risk factors for meniscal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carolin Bahns; Ulrich Bolm-Audorff; Andreas Seidler; Karla Romero Starke; Elke Ochsmann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Prevention at work needed to curb the worldwide strong increase in knee replacement surgery for working-age osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  P Paul F M Kuijer; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 5.024

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.