Literature DB >> 26589179

Incidence of peri-implantitis and oral quality of life in patients rehabilitated with implants with different neck designs: A 10-year retrospective study.

M Sánchez-Siles1, D Muñoz-Cámara2, N Salazar-Sánchez2, J F Ballester-Ferrandis2, F Camacho-Alonso3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate peri-implant bone loss, the presence of peri-implantitis, aesthetic satisfaction, and quality of life in patients with implant-based prosthetic restorations using implants with or without smooth necks, placed in different bone positions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 400 patients received 1,244 implants: 515 with smooth neck monitored over an average of 6.44 ± 2.55 years and 729 without smooth neck monitored over 5.61 ± 2.52 years. Radiographic bone loss, presence of periimplantitis, implant loss, quality of life (OHIP-14), and patient satisfaction with prosthetic esthetics were evaluated, comparing groups.
RESULTS: 120 implants developed peri-implantitis, 15 with a 2.5 mm smooth neck and 105 without smooth neck. Patients without smooth-necked implants showed a worse quality of life with statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction with prostheses was higher among the group without smooth neck.
CONCLUSIONS: Implants with smooth polished necks would appear to suffer less bone loss and peri-implantitis, and lead to better patient quality of life. However, implants without smooth necks placed crestally led to higher patient satisfaction with aesthetics.
Copyright © 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neck designs; Oral quality of life; Patient satisfaction; Peri-implantitis; Smooth neck

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26589179     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  8 in total

1.  Impact of machined versus structured implant shoulder designs on crestal bone level changes: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study.

Authors:  Daniel Rothamel; Maria Heinz; Daniel Ferrari; Alfons Eissing; Henrik Holtmann; Lara Schorn; Tim Fienitz
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-07-16

2.  Influence of titanium implant macrodesign on peri-implantitis occurrence: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Dragana Rakasevic; Zoran Lazic; Ivan Soldatovic; Miodrag Scepanovic; Dragana Gabric
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 3.  Evaluation of Implant Collar Surfaces for Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Roodabeh Koodaryan; Ali Hafezeqoran
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Yojana B Patil; Swati Joshi Asopa; Aashana Goel; Divya Jyoti; Nagaveni S Somayaji; Robin Sabharwal
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2020-02-10

Review 5.  How do peri-implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri-implantitis? A critical review.

Authors:  Ron Doornewaard; Wolfgang Jacquet; Jan Cosyn; Hugo De Bruyn
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  One-Piece Implants with Smooth Concave Neck to Enhance Soft Tissue Development and Preserve Marginal Bone Levels: A Retrospective Study with 1- to 6-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Axiotis; Paolo Nuzzolo; Carlo Barausse; Roberta Gasparro; Paolo Bucci; Roberto Pistilli; Gilberto Sammartino; Pietro Felice
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Therapeutic outcomes of non-grafted and platelet concentrations-grafted transcrestal maxillary sinus elevation (TSFE): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tianqi Guo; Karan Gulati; Ziyun Shen; Pingping Han; Zhen Fan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Patients with Fixed Prostheses on Zygomatic Implants Compared with the All-on-Four Concept: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study.

Authors:  Juan Alberto Fernández-Ruiz; Mariano Sánchez-Siles; Yolanda Guerrero-Sánchez; Jesús Pato-Mourelo; Fabio Camacho-Alonso
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.