Literature DB >> 26587963

Approximate number and approximate time discrimination each correlate with school math abilities in young children.

Darko Odic1, Juan Valle Lisboa2, Robert Eisinger3, Magdalena Gonzalez Olivera2, Alejandro Maiche2, Justin Halberda3.   

Abstract

What is the relationship between our intuitive sense of number (e.g., when estimating how many marbles are in a jar), and our intuitive sense of other quantities, including time (e.g., when estimating how long it has been since we last ate breakfast)? Recent work in cognitive, developmental, comparative psychology, and computational neuroscience has suggested that our representations of approximate number, time, and spatial extent are fundamentally linked and constitute a "generalized magnitude system". But, the shared behavioral and neural signatures between number, time, and space may alternatively be due to similar encoding and decision-making processes, rather than due to shared domain-general representations. In this study, we investigate the relationship between approximate number and time in a large sample of 6-8 year-old children in Uruguay by examining how individual differences in the precision of number and time estimation correlate with school mathematics performance. Over four testing days, each child completed an approximate number discrimination task, an approximate time discrimination task, a digit span task, and a large battery of symbolic math tests. We replicate previous reports showing that symbolic math abilities correlate with approximate number precision and extend those findings by showing that math abilities also correlate with approximate time precision. But, contrary to approximate number and time sharing common representations, we find that each of these dimensions uniquely correlates with formal math: approximate number correlates more strongly with formal math compared to time and continues to correlate with math even when precision in time and individual differences in working memory are controlled for. These results suggest that there are important differences in the mental representations of approximate number and approximate time and further clarify the relationship between quantity representations and mathematics.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Approximate number system; Formal mathematics; Individual differences; Time discrimination

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26587963     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  7 in total

1.  Effects of non-symbolic arithmetic training on symbolic arithmetic and the approximate number system.

Authors:  Jacky Au; Susanne M Jaeggi; Martin Buschkuehl
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2018-02-02

2.  The development of place value concepts: Approximation before principles.

Authors:  Kelly S Mix; Corinne A Bower; Gregory R Hancock; Lei Yuan; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2022-01-13

3.  Changing the precision of preschoolers' approximate number system representations changes their symbolic math performance.

Authors:  Jinjing Jenny Wang; Darko Odic; Justin Halberda; Lisa Feigenson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-04-08

Review 4.  Number, time, and space are not singularly represented: Evidence against a common magnitude system beyond early childhood.

Authors:  Karina Hamamouche; Sara Cordes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

5.  The SNARC effect is associated with worse mathematical intelligence and poorer time estimation.

Authors:  Peter Kramer; Paola Bressan; Massimo Grassi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Cognitive Load Affects Numerical and Temporal Judgments in Distinct Ways.

Authors:  Karina Hamamouche; Maura Keefe; Kerry E Jordan; Sara Cordes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-02

7.  The interplay between math anxiety and working memory on math performance: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Sandra Pellizzoni; Elisa Cargnelutti; Alessandro Cuder; Maria Chiara Passolunghi
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 6.499

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.