Javaid Nauman1, Dorthe Stensvold, Jeff S Coombes, Ulrik Wisløff. 1. 1The K.G. Jebsen Center of Exercise in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NORWAY; 2Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NORWAY; 3School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, AUSTRALIA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Prolonged sedentary time (ST) is associated with cardiovascular risk factors (CV-RF) independent of physical activity (PA). Whether a high level of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) can modify the deleterious health consequences related to high ST is not known. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 12,274 men and 14,209 women (≥20 yr) without known cardiovascular disease. Self-reported ST measurements during a regular day were divided into three sex-specific equally sized groups (≤4, 5 to <7, and ≥7 h·d(-1)). CRF was estimated (eCRF) using a previously validated nonexercise model. Using logistic regression analyses, adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for the association of ST with CV-RF clustering and for the potential modifying effect of eCRF. RESULTS: Each hour increase in ST was associated with 5% and 4% greater likelihood of having CV-RF clustering independent of PA in men and women, respectively. Among the participants with higher levels of eCRF, the adjusted OR values associated with ≥7 h·d(-1) of ST were 0.92 (0.56-1.51) for men and 1.16 (0.49-2.74) for women, compared with men and women with low ST (≤4 h·d(-1)) and high eCRF levels. In combined analyses of eCRF, PA, and ST, compared with the reference group of participants meeting the recommendations, ≤4 h·d(-1) of ST and high eCRF, the OR values were 0.63 (0.27-1.44) and 0.65 (0.14-3.07) in fit men and women with ≥7 h·d(-1) of ST, which did not meet the recommendations. Men and women meeting the PA recommendations, but were unfit, had significantly increased odds of having CV-RF clustering across levels of ST. CONCLUSION: High levels of eCRF abolished the increased odds of having CV-RF clustering associated with high ST, even among those individuals who did not meet the current PA recommendations.
PURPOSE: Prolonged sedentary time (ST) is associated with cardiovascular risk factors (CV-RF) independent of physical activity (PA). Whether a high level of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) can modify the deleterious health consequences related to high ST is not known. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 12,274 men and 14,209 women (≥20 yr) without known cardiovascular disease. Self-reported ST measurements during a regular day were divided into three sex-specific equally sized groups (≤4, 5 to <7, and ≥7 h·d(-1)). CRF was estimated (eCRF) using a previously validated nonexercise model. Using logistic regression analyses, adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for the association of ST with CV-RF clustering and for the potential modifying effect of eCRF. RESULTS: Each hour increase in ST was associated with 5% and 4% greater likelihood of having CV-RF clustering independent of PA in men and women, respectively. Among the participants with higher levels of eCRF, the adjusted OR values associated with ≥7 h·d(-1) of ST were 0.92 (0.56-1.51) for men and 1.16 (0.49-2.74) for women, compared with men and women with low ST (≤4 h·d(-1)) and high eCRF levels. In combined analyses of eCRF, PA, and ST, compared with the reference group of participants meeting the recommendations, ≤4 h·d(-1) of ST and high eCRF, the OR values were 0.63 (0.27-1.44) and 0.65 (0.14-3.07) in fit men and women with ≥7 h·d(-1) of ST, which did not meet the recommendations. Men and women meeting the PA recommendations, but were unfit, had significantly increased odds of having CV-RF clustering across levels of ST. CONCLUSION: High levels of eCRF abolished the increased odds of having CV-RF clustering associated with high ST, even among those individuals who did not meet the current PA recommendations.
Authors: Frank W Booth; Christian K Roberts; John P Thyfault; Gregory N Ruegsegger; Ryan G Toedebusch Journal: Physiol Rev Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 37.312
Authors: Jill A Kanaley; Sheri R Colberg; Matthew H Corcoran; Steven K Malin; Nancy R Rodriguez; Carlos J Crespo; John P Kirwan; Juleen R Zierath Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Gregory J Grosicki; Meral N Culver; Nathan K McMillan; Brett L Cross; Alexander H K Montoye; Bryan L Riemann; Andrew A Flatt Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2022-08-23 Impact factor: 5.625
Authors: Jeroen H P M van der Velde; Nicolaas C Schaper; Coen D A Stehouwer; Carla J H van der Kallen; Simone J S Sep; Miranda T Schram; Ronald M A Henry; Pieter C Dagnelie; Simone J P M Eussen; Martien C J M van Dongen; Hans H C M Savelberg; Annemarie Koster Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Mary-Margaret E Remchak; Kelsey L Piersol; Sabha Bhatti; Andrea M Spaeth; Jennifer F Buckman; Steven K Malin Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 5.717