Chris P Repka1, Reid Hayward. 1. 1Department of Health Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ; 2School of Sport and Exercise Science and the Rocky Mountain Cancer Rehabilitation Institute, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an exercise intervention (EX) on muscular strength, cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), and oxidative stress in cancer survivors compared with a nonexercising cancer control group (CON). METHODS:Fifteen cancer patients and seven age-matched individuals with no history of cancer (NC) participated in this study. A blood draw and assessments of muscular strength and CRF were administered to cancer survivors within 6 wk of completing radiation or chemotherapy, and again 10 wk later. Eight cancer patients completed a 10-wk supervised exercise intervention, whereas seven continued standard care. Baseline oxidative stress was compared between cancer patients and the NC group. Changes in plasma protein carbonyls, 8-OHdG, and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity were compared between groups using repeated-measures ANOVA, and correlations between fitness and oxidative stress changes were evaluated. RESULTS:Baseline antioxidant capacity was significantly lower, and plasma protein carbonyls were significantly higher in cancer patients compared with NC (P = 0.001). EX had a significant increase in antioxidant capacity (P < 0.001) and decrease in protein carbonyls (P = 0.023), whereas CON did not. Improvements in composite arm (41%, P = 0.002) and leg strength (34%, P = 0.008), isometric handgrip strength (11%, P = 0.015), and V˙O2peak (16%, P = 0.018) were significant in EX but not in CON. 8-OHdG changes were significantly correlated with changes in V˙O2peak (r = -0.89, P < 0.001), arm strength (r = -0.67, P = 0.004), and leg strength (r = -0.56, P = 0.019). CONCLUSION:A whole-body exercise intervention for cancer survivors may be an effective method of concurrently increasing muscular strength, CRF, and antioxidant capacity while decreasing markers of oxidative stress.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an exercise intervention (EX) on muscular strength, cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), and oxidative stress in cancer survivors compared with a nonexercising cancer control group (CON). METHODS: Fifteen cancerpatients and seven age-matched individuals with no history of cancer (NC) participated in this study. A blood draw and assessments of muscular strength and CRF were administered to cancer survivors within 6 wk of completing radiation or chemotherapy, and again 10 wk later. Eight cancerpatients completed a 10-wk supervised exercise intervention, whereas seven continued standard care. Baseline oxidative stress was compared between cancerpatients and the NC group. Changes in plasma protein carbonyls, 8-OHdG, and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity were compared between groups using repeated-measures ANOVA, and correlations between fitness and oxidative stress changes were evaluated. RESULTS: Baseline antioxidant capacity was significantly lower, and plasma protein carbonyls were significantly higher in cancerpatients compared with NC (P = 0.001). EX had a significant increase in antioxidant capacity (P < 0.001) and decrease in protein carbonyls (P = 0.023), whereas CON did not. Improvements in composite arm (41%, P = 0.002) and leg strength (34%, P = 0.008), isometric handgrip strength (11%, P = 0.015), and V˙O2peak (16%, P = 0.018) were significant in EX but not in CON. 8-OHdG changes were significantly correlated with changes in V˙O2peak (r = -0.89, P < 0.001), arm strength (r = -0.67, P = 0.004), and leg strength (r = -0.56, P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: A whole-body exercise intervention for cancer survivors may be an effective method of concurrently increasing muscular strength, CRF, and antioxidant capacity while decreasing markers of oxidative stress.
Authors: Ryan J Marker; Emily Cox-Martin; Catherine M Jankowski; W Thomas Purcell; John C Peters Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Emer M Guinan; Suzanne L Doyle; Linda O'Neill; Margaret R Dunne; Emma K Foley; Jacintha O'Sullivan; John V Reynolds; Juliette Hussey Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez; Laura Redondo-Flórez; Alejandro Rubio-Zarapuz; Ismael Martínez-Guardado; Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez; José Francisco Tornero-Aguilera Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: E Venturini; G Iannuzzo; A D'Andrea; M Pacileo; L Tarantini; M L Canale; M Gentile; G Vitale; F M Sarullo; R Vastarella; A Di Lorenzo; C Testa; A Parlato; C Vigorito; F Giallauria Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 4.964