| Literature DB >> 26587470 |
Si Zhang1, Zhaolian Lu2, Hongmei Liang2, Ximei Fu2, Yan Zhang3, Xin Liu4, Genshu Bao2, Tao Jing2, Xuan Wang5, Meng Wang6, Julong Wu7, Gen Chen8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil could lead to a decline in fertility in Caenorhabditis elegans. The aim of this study was to describe the mechanisms underlying such an altered fertility phenotype and to illustrate the specific genes and pathways that are involved in the related phenotypic changes in C. elegans.Entities:
Keywords: 5-Fluorouracil; Caenorhabditis elegans; Digital gene expression
Year: 2015 PMID: 26587470 PMCID: PMC4645726
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
The primers used in this study
| daf-14 | CAAGTGATGAGTGCCGAATGT | TCCAACTGTGTTTCGGATTTGT | NM_001268546 |
| K11D12.6 | TCTTCTTCTCCTTCCCTTCCTTT | AGTTATTCTCATTTCCTCCACATCC | NM_071949 |
| col-165 | GCCACCGAGCAACCATACA | GCGTTTCCGTCCTTTCCA | NM_076346 |
| col-121 | TATTGTCCATCCGATTGTGGAG | TTGCTGATTGGTAGTTGGCTGT | NM_069254 |
| clec-85 | CATACCTCCCTCCAGGCAAA | CTCGGCTCAAACCAATCCA | NM_067861 |
| col-150 | GAAGAAGTTTTGGATGGTGTGAAGA | CGCTTTTGACGGAAGACAGAG | NM_073246 |
| col-131 | CACATGCTCCATCAATCTCTCC | CCCGTGTTTTGTCCCATTTT | NM_070106 |
| col-90 | CTCTGCGTGATGAAGTTGAAGG | AGTTGGGGATTGAAGAACAAGAAG | NM_066328 |
| col-175 | TGAATCTCGTGCTGCTGCTT | CGTCTTTTCCATCCTCTCCATC | NM_077154 |
| col-41 | AACTCCAGGAAACGCTGGTC | TGGGGTTCTGTCGTCTTGTCT | NM_078121 |
| col-38 | CAGGAGGACGTGGAGATCAAG | AGATGATGGGTAACAGCCAGAGA | NM_063409 |
| col-49 | ATCGCAATTGTCGGATTGG | TCTTCCGTTCTCCGCCTTT | NM_058705 |
| col-113 | GGACAAATTGGAATGGTTGGA | GCTGAGAAGTTGATGGTTGTGG | NM_068722 |
| col-124 | CGGATATGCTGCCTTGACTTT | TTGCGAGTGTGATGGATGTAGTT | NM_069466 |
| dpy-5 | CTGCTATCGTTGCTTGCCTTT | AAGATTCCACGAACGTATTGCTC | NM_059194 |
| emb-9 | CAGCAATTCGTCCATACATTTCTC | CCACATACCCGACCATCCTT | NM_001027492 |
| let-2 | GAAACGAGAAATCCCATAACCAAG | TGAAGTCGCAGAACAGGAATG | NM_078262 |
| mec-5 | CGCAATCCAGACAGAAATCAA | TCTACCGCTCATTCCATCCTC | NM_171808 |
| CELE_C24B9.3 | CAATCTCCATCCGTTTCGTGT | AGTAGTGACCAGTGCGAAGGAAG | NM_001028500 |
The comparison of various concentration of 5-fu to control
| 20uM group | 180 | 36.00 |
| 10uM group | 295 | 58.40 |
| 5uM group | 440 | 87.10 |
| Control group | 505 | 100 |
Compared with Control group,
P <0.001.
The statistics of DGE in two samples
| Raw Data | Total | 4410363 | 4370074 |
| Distinct Tag | 137741 | 137059 | |
| Clean Tag | Total number | 4207526 | 4167565 |
| Distinct Tag number | 56471 | 56530 | |
| All Tag Mapping to Gene | Total number | 3142157 | 3129666 |
| Total % of clean tag | 74.68% | 75.10% | |
| Distinct Tag number | 40183 | 40578 | |
| Distinct Tag % of clean tag | 71.16% | 71.78% | |
| Unambiguous Tag Mapping to Gene | Total number | 2706754 | 2770479 |
| Total % of clean tag | 64.33% | 66.48% | |
| Distinct Tag number | 38254 | 38753 | |
| Distinct Tag % of clean tag | 67.74% | 68.55% | |
| All Tag-mapped Genes | Number | 12462 | 12397 |
| % of ref genes | 55.74% | 55.45% | |
| Unambiguous Tag mapped Genes | Number | 11638 | 11549 |
| % of ref genes | 52.05% | 51.65% | |
| Mapping to Genome | Total number | 897080 | 914567 |
| Total % of clean tag | 21.32% | 21.94% | |
| Distinct Tag number | 10231 | 10861 | |
| Distinct Tag % of clean tag | 18.12% | 19.21% |
Fig. 1:The distribution of control total clean tags(A)The distribution of control distinct clean tags(B)The distribution of 5-Fu total clean tags(C)The distribution of 5-Fu distinct clean tags(D)
Fig. 2:Distribution of different expressed genes between control and 5-Fu
Upregulated and downregulated genes in selected pathways
| daf-14 | 2.03 | 2.4 | 1.6 | NM_001268546 |
| K11D12.6 | 10.96 | 6.9 | 1.1 | NM_071949 |
| col-165 | 3.02 | 9.4 | 4.7 | NM_076346 |
| col-121 | 2.89 | 8.0 | 3.1 | NM_069254 |
| clec-85 | 1.29 | 1.6 | 2.8 | NM_067861 |
| col-150 | –10.89 | 1.2 | 1.9 | NM_073246 |
| col-131 | –9.15 | 6.7 | 3.8 | NM_070106 |
| col-90 | –5.43 | 10.0 | 1.5 | NM_066328 |
| col-175 | –4.85 | 3.5 | 9.4 | NM_077154 |
| col-41 | –4.39 | 8.8 | 1.4 | NM_078121 |
| col-38 | –4.12 | 7.0 | 7.7 | NM_063409 |
| col-49 | –3.51 | 3.0 | 2.2 | NM_058705 |
| col-113 | –3.36 | 4.4 | 3.4 | NM_068722 |
| col-124 | –2.98 | 3.4 | 5.3 | NM_069466 |
| dpy-5 | –4.36 | 6.5 | 7.8 | NM_059194 |
| emb-9 | –3.01 | 1.6 | 1.4 | NM_001027492 |
| let-2 | –1.61 | 7.9 | 2.9 | NM_078262 |
| mec-5 | –1.23 | 2.1 | 8.6 | NM_171808 |
| CELE_C24B9.3 | –1.62 | 1.2 | 4.4 | NM_001028500 |
The value of log2 Ratio greater than zero means upregulated and vice versa
Fig. 3:the difference among the selected genes
The data from DGE and Quantitative PCR
| daf-14 | 2.03 | 9.653 | TGF-beta signaling |
| K11D12.6 | 10.96 | 5.685 | |
| col-165 | 3.02 | 2.58 | Focal adhesion |
| col-121 | 2.89 | 24.05 | Focal adhesion |
| clec-85 | 1.29 | 1.565 | |
| col-150 | –10.89 | 9.41E-02 | |
| col-131 | –9.15 | 7.67E-03 | |
| col-90 | –5.43 | 3.54E-02 | |
| col-175 | –4.85 | 2.58E-03 | |
| col-41 | –4.39 | 4.45E-2 | |
| col-38 | –4.12 | 2.53E-4 | |
| col-49 | –3.51 | 4.53E-03 | |
| col-113 | –3.36 | 2.74E-03 | |
| col-124 | –2.98 | 1.59E-02 | |
| dpy-5 | –4.36 | 2.79E-03 | |
| emb-9 | –3.01 | 3.66E-01 | |
| let-2 | –1.61 | 7.82E-02 | |
| mec-5 | –1.23 | 9.03E-02 | |
| CELE_C24B9.3 | –1.62 | 5.85E-01 | Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy |
ECM-R*: refers to ECM-receptor interaction pathway