| Literature DB >> 26587345 |
Brian K Whitlock1, Joseph A Daniel2, Lisa L Amelse1, Valeria M Tanco3, Kelly A Chameroy1, F Neal Schrick4.
Abstract
Kisspeptin receptor (KISS1R) agonists with increased half-life and similar efficacy to kisspeptin in vitro may provide beneficial applications in breeding management of many species. However, many of these agonists have not been tested in vivo. These studies were designed to test and compare the effects of a KISS1R agonist (FTM080) and kisspeptin on luteinizing hormone (LH) in vivo. In experiment 1 (pilot study), sheep were treated with FTM080 (500 pmol/kg BW) or sterile water (VEH) intravenosuly. Blood was collected every 15 min before (1 h) and after (1 h) treatment. In experiment 2, sheep were treated with KP-10 (human Metastin 45-54; 500 pmol/kg BW), one of three dosages of FTM080 (500 (FTM080:500), 2500 (FTM080:2500), or 5000 (FTM080:5000) pmol/kg BW), or VEH intravenously. Blood was collected every 15 min before (1 h) and after (4 h) treatment. In experiment 1, FTM080:500 increased (P < 0.05) plasma LH concentrations when compared to VEH. The area under the curve (AUC) of LH following FTM080:500 treatment was also increased (P < 0.05). In experiment 2, plasma LH concentrations increased (P < 0.05) following treatment with KP-10 and FTM080:5000 when compared to VEH and FTM080:500. The AUC of LH following KP-10 was greater than (P < 0.05) all other treatments and the AUC of LH following FTM080:5000 was greater than (P < 0.05) all treatments except KP-10. These data provide evidence to suggest that FTM080 stimulates the gonadotropic axis of ruminants in vivo. Any increased half-life and comparable efficacy of FTM080 to KP-10 in vitro does not appear to translate to in vivo in sheep.Entities:
Keywords: Agonist; Kisspeptin; Luteinizing hormone; Sheep
Year: 2015 PMID: 26587345 PMCID: PMC4647575 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1382
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Effect of i.v. KISS1R agonist, FTM080, on plasma LH concentrations in anestrous ewes (n = 3).
(A) Response of circulating concentration of LH (mean ± pooled SEM = 0.13) to i.v. administration of VEH and FTM080 (500 pmol/kg BW; FTM080:500). There was an effect of time (P = 0.0019) and an interaction for FTM080 by time for LH (P = 0.0009). ∗p < 0.05 vs. VEH. (B) Effect of i.v. administration of VEH and FTM080 (500 pmol/kg BW; FTM080:500) on AUC of LH concentrations from −60 to 0 min before (Pre-TRT) and from 0 to 60 min following treatment (Post-TRT) (mean ± pooled SEM = 6.29). AUCs with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Effect of i.v. KP-10 and FTM080, KISS1R agonist, on plasma LH concentrations in anestrous ewes (n = 4).
(A) Response of circulating concentration of LH (mean ± SEM) to i.v. administration of VEH (sterile water), KP-10 (500 pmol/kg), and FTM080 (500 (FTM080:500), 2500 (FTM080:2500), or 5000 (FTM080:5000) pmol/kg BW). There was an effect of time (P < 0.0001) and an interaction of treatment and time (P < 0.0001) on plasma LH concentrations. ∗p < 0.05 vs. VEH. † p < 0.05 vs. FTM080:500. p < 0.05 vs. FTM080:2500. (B) Effect of i.v. administration of VEH (sterile water), KP-10 (500 pmol/kg BW), and FTM080:500, FTM080:2500, or FTM080:5000 on AUC of plasma LH concentrations from −60 to 0 min before (Pre-TRT) and from 0 to 60 min following treatment (1 h Post-TRT) (mean ± SEM). There was an effect of treatment (P < 0.0001), period (pre-treatment (−60 to 0 min); post-treatment (0 to 60 min); P < 0.0001), and an interaction of treatment and period (P < 0.0001) on area under the curve (AUC) of plasma LH concentrations. AUCs with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05).