Literature DB >> 26587114

Uterine Incarceration: Rare Cause of Urinary Retention in Healthy Pregnant Patients.

Richard Slama1, Mike Barry1, Ken McManus1, Doug Latham1, Matthew Berniard1.   

Abstract

Gravid uterine incarceration (GUI) is a condition that is well discussed in literature; however, there are few acute diagnoses in the emergency department (ED). We present a case series where three multiparous females presented to the ED with non-specific urinary symptoms. On bedside ultrasound, each patient was noted to have a retroverted uterus and inferior bladder entrapment under the sacral promontory. GUI is a rare condition that can lead to uremia, sepsis, peritonitis, and ultimately maternal death. Emergency physicians should include GUI in their differential diagnosis in this patient population and use bedside ultrasound as an adjunct to diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26587114      PMCID: PMC4644058          DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2015.7.27185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Emerg Med        ISSN: 1936-900X


INTRODUCTION

Gravid uterine incarceration (GUI) is a relatively rare condition that results in the uterus becoming trapped between the sacral promontory and the pubic symphysis during pregnancy.1 As the uterus becomes more gravid, the cervix becomes superiorly displaced and can eventually lead to bladder outlet obstruction. We report a case series of uterine incarceration where otherwise-healthy patients presented to the emergency department (ED) between approximately 13 weeks and 21 weeks estimated gestational age with dysuria, urgency, frequency, and low back pain after being recently seen by obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) which could not determine the cause for the patients’ symptoms. In this case series we present three cases of uterine incarceration diagnosed by ultrasound in the ED, discuss previously published cases, and discuss the implications for emergency physicians.

CASE REPORT

Three multiparous patients with pertinent history and symptomatology (Table) presented to the ED with dysuria, urgency, frequency, and low back pain between two and six weeks in duration. Further review of systems was otherwise negative. The patients denied all toxic habits including alcohol, drugs and tobacco, and did not use any medications other than prenatal vitamins.
Table

Multiparous patients with symptoms indicating possible gravid uterine incarceration.

PatientAgeEGAParityPMH/comorbiditiesSymptomsOutcome
13713G6P2122NoneUrinary retention, bilateral costo-vertebral tenderness and thick white discharge on speculum examSelf-catheterization, Pessary
24213G5P3013Infertility, LEEP, salpingectomyUrinary retentionSelf-catheterization, pessary placement
32221G15P5009Multiple spontaneous abortions, clotting disorderUrinary retention, LUQ pain, nauseaPessary placement

EGA, estimated gestational age; PMH, past medical history; LEEP, look electrosurgical excision procedure; LUQ, left upper quadrant

Patient #1 had been seen recently by OBGYN where she underwent evaluation for dysuria/urinary tract infection that was negative. Because of her unremitting symptoms and despite reassurance, she came to the ED for evaluation. Initial laboratory evaluation of the patient revealed only bacterial vaginosis. A bedside ultrasound assessment was performed that showed normal-appearing kidneys, and was negative for free abdominal fluid or pericardial effusion. The inferior bladder pole was entrapped by the gravid uterus, and contained a significant volume of urine (Figure).
Figure

Inferior bladder, containing significant volume of urine, entrapped by gravid uterus.

Upon these findings, the patients underwent straight Foley catheterization with return of 180mL urine that resulted in alleviation of symptoms. Patient #2 presented with progressively increasing difficulty with urination over a period of two weeks. She underwent physical exam and formal laboratory evaluation that was unrevealing for any infectious process. She was evaluated by bedside ultrasound, which again revealed trapping of the bladder pole by the gravid uterus. She also underwent straight catheterization and was instructed on self-catheterization with next-day follow up with OBGYN. Patient #3 had a more acute onset of her retention that developed over a two-day period. She was evaluated in a similar manner to patients #1 and #2 with the only abnormal finding being bacterial vaginosis. Her bedside ultrasound showed a retroflexed uterus and a significant amount of urine in the bladder. Because of her symptoms she was sent for a formal pelvic ultrasound in the ED, which confirmed the diagnosis of uterine incarceration and showed >600mL in the bladder. She underwent straight catheterization with return of 400mL urine. All three patients received formal ultrasounds confirming compression of the inferior pole of the bladder. OBGYN was consulted and examined the patients in the ED, ultimately deciding to discharge the patients with close follow up the next day. The patients were given instruction on self-catheterization, and return precautions should their condition worsen. They were seen the next day in the OBGYN clinic and underwent a trial of pessary placement with successful alleviation of their symptoms. Three weeks later the patients’ symptoms had improved to the point where they no longer required use of the pessary.

DISCUSSION

The exact mechanism of GUI is believed to be due to trapping of the uterine fundus in a retroverted position, which leads to a progressively elongated cervix that becomes displaced anteriorly and leads to obstructive bladder symptoms.2 Risk factors for this condition include post-surgical adhesions, pelvic inflammatory disease, fibroids, and laxity of supporting tissues.3 The most typical presentation occurs between 14 and 16 weeks of gestation with a variety of symptoms mimicking common gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and musculoskeletal conditions. Physical findings include anterior displacement of the uterus, anterior angulation of the vaginal angle, retroverted uterus, cervical displacement toward cephalad and a low-lying fundal height for gestational age.4 Though urinary tract infections (UTI) are by far the most common cause of dysuria in pregnant patients, a patient with a GUI can easily be misdiagnosed as a UTI even by experienced clinicians. Though these patients’ particular presentations did not appear alarming, they could have easily been disregarded as normal pregnancy pain or Braxton-Hicks contractions if careful attention to detail was not made. The complications of a missed GUI are rare, but could be potentially disastrous and life threatening. These complications include hydronephrosis, UTI, bladder rupture, sepsis, peritonitis, miscarriage, oligohydramnios, fetal growth restriction, and fetal demise.5–7 Even if these immediate complications are not present, delayed complications can include a pregnancy loss of up to 33% in the second trimester.8,9 Because of the potential of these serious complications, this is a diagnosis that should be considered more frequently in the ED, especially in community care settings such as ours, where obstetric patients make up a large portion of the ED census per year. Though GUI has been extensively described in the literature, there are few reports of its actual diagnosis in the ED setting. During a literature search we did find one case report where an ED noted that a patient had a clinically incarcerated uterus; however, there was no ultrasonographic evidence of bladder obstruction in this particular case.10 We believe that our case series is the first known series of GUI diagnosis in the ED using bedside ultrasonography. Although there are no established gold standard tests for GUI, both ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging seem to be acceptable modalities for confirming the diagnosis.11,12 This case demonstrates one of the many utilities of ultrasound in the ED setting, particularly in experienced operators. While no conclusions about statistical significance of testing for GUI can be drawn from this particular test, we emphasize two main points from our experience. The first is that GUI is a rare, potentially fatal, but possible diagnosis in all pregnant women with symptoms of UTI and/or bladder obstruction that should be in the differential diagnosis for emergency physicians. Second, we believe that when used in conjunction with clinical findings, bedside emergency ultrasound is an excellent adjunct to aid in the diagnosis of GUI.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Incarceration of the retroverted gravid uterus--a review.

Authors:  B Jacobsson; D Wide-Swensson
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of incarceration of the gravid uterus.

Authors:  Heleen J van Beekhuizen; Hans W Bodewes; Eveline M Tepe; Herman P Oosterbaan; Roy Kruitwagen; Roel Nijland
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings in uterine incarceration.

Authors:  Dellano D Fernandes; Cheryl A Sadow; Katherine E Economy; Carol B Benson
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Uterine incarceration during the third trimester: a rare complication of pregnancy.

Authors:  J T Van Winter; P L Ogburn; J A Ney; D J Hetzel
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Incarcerated retroverted uterus--a non recurring complication of pregnancy.

Authors:  M P O'Connell; C M Ivory; R W Hunter
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 6.  Colonoscopy-assisted reposition of the incarcerated uterus in mid-pregnancy: a report of four cases and a literature review.

Authors:  I Dierickx; C Van Holsbeke; T Mesens; A Gevers; L Meylaerts; W Voets; E Beckers; W Gyselaers
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Incarceration of a gravid fibroid uterus.

Authors:  A H Feusner; P D Mueller
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  The incarcerated gravid uterus.

Authors:  J M Gibbons; W B Paley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Incarceration of the gravid uterus.

Authors:  L Lettieri; J F Rodis; D A McLean; W A Campbell; A M Vintzileos
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.347

10.  Fever, sacral pain, and pregnancy: an incarcerated uterus.

Authors:  Amy N Sweigart; Michael J Matteucci
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-11
  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Incarceration of the gravid uterus: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Cha Han; Chen Wang; Lulu Han; Guoyan Liu; Huiyang Li; Fuman She; Fengxia Xue; Yingmei Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Acute urinary retention in the first and second-trimester of pregnancy: Three case reports.

Authors:  Lin Zhuang; Xiao-Yin Wang; Yan Sang; Jiao Xu; Xue-Lian He
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Incarcerated gravid uterus: A rare but potentially devastating obstetric complication.

Authors:  Carnot Njutapvoui Ntafam; Bryce D Beutler; Robert D Harris
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-10

4.  Urinary tract obstruction in the second trimester: a report of an incarcerated gravid uterus.

Authors:  Mariana Morais; Mário Moura; Ana Correia; Yida Fan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2022-09-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.