| Literature DB >> 26587017 |
Dongmei Han1, Yonghui Dai2, Tianlin Han3, Xingyun Dai4.
Abstract
With the rapid development of the internet and information technology, the increasingly diversified portable mobile terminals, online shopping, and social media have facilitated information exchange, social communication, and financial payment for people more and more than ever before. In the meantime, information security and privacy protection have been meeting with new severe challenges. Although we have taken a variety of information security measures in both management and technology, the actual effectiveness depends firstly on people's awareness of information security and the cognition of potential risks. In order to explore the new technology for the objective assessment of people's awareness and cognition on information security, this paper takes the online financial payment as example and conducts an experimental study based on the analysis of electrophysiological signals. Results indicate that left hemisphere and beta rhythms of electroencephalogram (EEG) signal are sensitive to the cognitive degree of risks in the awareness of information security, which may be probably considered as the sign to assess people's cognition of potential risks in online financial payment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26587017 PMCID: PMC4637441 DOI: 10.1155/2015/762403
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Model Human Processor.
Figure 2Cognitive framework for information security awareness.
The frequency and amplitude of basic band.
| Frequency band | Frequency (Hz) | Amplitude ( |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.5~3.5 | 20~200 |
|
| 4~7 | 100~150 |
|
| 8~13 | 20~200 |
|
| 14~30 | 5~20 |
Figure 3The formation process of EEG.
Figure 4EEG electrodes location of international 10–20 system.
Figure 5Sample pictures of trail.
Sample of experimental records.
| Tester | Event | Minutes | Seconds | Channel 1 | Channel 2 | Channel 3 | Channel 4 | Channel 5 | Channel 6 | Channel 7 | Channel 8 | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number 01 | 1 | 3.511 | 210.633 | 33.925 | 10.482 | 36.855 | −1.352 | 5.072 | 7.101 | 47.675 | −135.587 | −738.123 |
| Number 01 | 1 | 3.511 | 210.641 | 25.359 | 5.410 | 41.251 | 11.158 | 12.172 | 17.921 | 74.387 | −129.163 | −738.123 |
| Number 01 | 1 | 3.511 | 210.648 | 35.954 | 31.784 | 50.719 | 32.798 | 27.388 | 29.417 | 64.920 | −93.322 | −738.123 |
| Number 01 | 1 | 3.511 | 210.656 | 6.875 | 41.251 | 32.798 | 43.618 | 26.712 | 36.179 | 81.826 | −66.610 | −738.123 |
| Number 01 | 1 | 3.511 | 210.664 | 53.085 | 70.330 | 78.445 | 78.445 | 66.948 | 59.848 | 120.710 | −34.827 | −738.123 |
| Number 01 | 1 | 3.511 | 210.672 | 63.342 | 68.639 | 74.049 | 66.948 | 65.934 | 61.877 | 113.271 | −3.381 | −738.123 |
| Number 01 | 1 | 3.511 | 210.680 | 84.869 | 104.818 | 130.178 | 125.782 | 113.271 | 113.948 | 159.594 | 29.079 | −738.123 |
| Number 01 | 1 | 3.511 | 210.688 | 168.385 | 151.479 | 197.802 | 160.609 | 167.709 | 138.292 | 180.220 | 51.395 | −738.123 |
| Number 01 | 1 | 3.512 | 210.695 | 194.759 | 149.789 | 201.860 | 160.270 | 192.392 | 152.494 | 207.608 | 104.480 | −738.123 |
| Number 01 | 1 | 3.512 | 210.703 | 257.875 | 200.507 | 253.593 | 218.090 | 234.658 | 196.788 | 234.996 | 143.026 | −738.123 |
| Number 01 | 1 | 3.512 | 210.711 | 238.377 | 187.658 | 207.270 | 184.277 | 180.220 | 170.752 | 183.263 | 123.415 | −738.123 |
| ⋮ | ⋮ | ⋮ | ⋮ | ⋮ | ⋮ | ⋮ | ⋮ | ⋮ | ⋮ | ⋮ | ⋮ | ⋮ |
| Number 12 | 9 | 23.071 | 1384.227 | −28.966 | −75.063 | −11.158 | −52.747 | −1.014 | −29.417 | 26.374 | −7.439 | −738.123 |
Figure 6Contrast of initial EEG signal and denoising EEG signal.
Figure 7The best wavelet decomposition tree.
Figure 8Four types of rhythm signals extracted from wavelet transformation.
Rhythm energy and energy ratio.
| Rhythm energy | Energy ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Task 1 | Task 2 | Task 1 | Task 2 | ||
| FP1 |
| 0.3266 | 0.4593 | 0.4801 | 0.5872 |
|
| 0.1386 | 0.1528 | 0.2037 | 0.1923 | |
|
| 0.0555 | 0.0396 | 0.0817 | 0.0517 | |
|
| 0.1595 | 0.1305 | 0.2345 | 0.1688 | |
|
| |||||
| FP2 |
| 0.3436 | 0.4734 | 0.5021 | 0.5903 |
|
| 0.1525 | 0.1609 | 0.2229 | 0.2007 | |
|
| 0.0444 | 0.0364 | 0.0649 | 0.0454 | |
|
| 0.1437 | 0.1312 | 0.2101 | 0.1636 | |
|
| |||||
| T3 |
| 0.3304 | 0.4834 | 0.4740 | 0.5988 |
|
| 0.1388 | 0.1490 | 0.1991 | 0.1845 | |
|
| 0.0559 | 0.0388 | 0.0802 | 0.0472 | |
|
| 0.1720 | 0.1361 | 0.2467 | 0.1695 | |
|
| |||||
| T4 |
| 0.3278 | 0.4956 | 0.4927 | 0.6129 |
|
| 0.1385 | 0.1523 | 0.2081 | 0.1884 | |
|
| 0.0490 | 0.0337 | 0.0737 | 0.0417 | |
|
| 0.1501 | 0.1270 | 0.2255 | 0.1570 | |
|
| |||||
| C3 |
| 0.3174 | 0.4906 | 0.4572 | 0.6088 |
|
| 0.1402 | 0.1465 | 0.2020 | 0.1818 | |
|
| 0.0569 | 0.0390 | 0.0820 | 0.0384 | |
|
| 0.1797 | 0.1297 | 0.2588 | 0.1710 | |
|
| |||||
| C4 |
| 0.3370 | 0.4873 | 0.5072 | 0.6102 |
|
| 0.1307 | 0.1536 | 0.1968 | 0.1923 | |
|
| 0.0476 | 0.0330 | 0.0717 | 0.0414 | |
|
| 0.1490 | 0.1247 | 0.2243 | 0.1561 | |
|
| |||||
| O1 |
| 0.3126 | 0.4733 | 0.4833 | 0.6001 |
|
| 0.1350 | 0.1472 | 0.2001 | 0.1866 | |
|
| 0.0573 | 0.0378 | 0.0849 | 0.0479 | |
|
| 0.1698 | 0.1304 | 0.2317 | 0.1654 | |
|
| |||||
| O2 |
| 0.3720 | 0.5257 | 0.5014 | 0.6224 |
|
| 0.1482 | 0.1534 | 0.1998 | 0.1816 | |
|
| 0.0592 | 0.0377 | 0.0799 | 0.0447 | |
|
| 0.1624 | 0.1278 | 0.2189 | 0.1513 | |
Figure 9Energy ratio of beta rhythm of two test tasks.