| Literature DB >> 26586999 |
Kamlesh Kumar Sahu1, Nozomu Hatakeyama2, Akira Miyamoto2.
Abstract
Interactions in proteins have been studied using several chemical information techniques including quantum chemical methods that are applied to truncated systems composed of the ligand molecule and the surrounding amino acids of the receptor. In this work we adopt an approach to study these interactions accounting for as many as possible explicit solvent molecules and without the need of a fragmented calculation. Furthermore, we embed our quantum chemical calculations within a molecular dynamics framework that enables a fundamentally fast system for quantum molecular dynamic simulations (QCMD). Central to this new system for QCMD is the tight binding QC system, newly developed in our laboratories, and which combined with the MD paradigm results in an ultra accelerated QCMD method for protein-ligand interaction evaluations. We have applied our newly developed method to the Nevirapine (NVP)-Reverse Transcriptase (RT) system. We show how the proposed method leads us to new findings. The advanced QCMD was applied to a system of RT with NVP and it has led to the knowledge of specific groups and atoms that interact with surrounding amino acids of RT and help in drug binding. The information derived from this calculation may be used in designing drugs for NVP resistant virus strains that have binding capability like NVP.Entities:
Keywords: Density function theory; Enzyme; Nevirapine; Quantum chemical molecular dynamics (QCMD) calculation; Reverse Transcriptase
Year: 2014 PMID: 26586999 PMCID: PMC4625139 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Figure 1Nevirapine (shown as space fill model) and protein part falling under 10 Å radii from Nevirapine with water molecules.
Comparison of orbital population of Nevirapine and Tyrosine 188 system from DFT calculation and colors.
| Castep | Colors | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| %s | %p | %s | %p | |
| Hydrogen | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 |
| Carbon | 28.36 | 71.64 | 30.06 | 69.94 |
| Nitrogen | 27.21 | 72.79 | 24.93 | 75.07 |
| Oxygen | 26.98 | 73.02 | 23.21 | 76.79 |
Figure 2Truncated model of NVP–Tyrosine complex on which colors and castep calculations were done for comparison of orbital population.
Bond population, bond energy and distance between Nitrogen atom from the pyridine ring of Nevirapine and hydrogen from Tyrosine 188 residue from RT enzyme.
| Bond | Distance (Å) | Energy (kcal/mol) | BP |
|---|---|---|---|
| N1–H1 | 2.96 | −4.6 | 0.02 |
Figure 3Interaction between Nitrogen atom from the pyridine ring of Nevirapine and hydrogen from Tyrosine 188 residue from RT enzyme.
Bond population, bond energy and distance between hydrogen atom from the cyclopropane ring of Nevirapine and Nitrogen from Tyrosine 181 residue from RT enzyme.
| Bond | Distance (Å) | Energy (kcal/mol) | BP |
|---|---|---|---|
| N2–H2 | 2.99 | −6.8 | 0.042 |
Figure 4Interaction between hydrogen atom from the cyclopropane ring of Nevirapine and Nitrogen from Tyrosine 181 residue from RT enzyme.
Bond population, bond energy and distance between Oxygen (O3) from Nevirapine and Hydrogen (H3) from Valine106.
| Bond | Distance (Å) | Energy (kcal/mol) | BP |
|---|---|---|---|
| H3–O3 | 2.9 | −4.9 | 0.02 |
Figure 5Interactions between Oxygen from Nevirapine and Hydrogen from Valine106.