Literature DB >> 26586829

The Role of Motion Extrapolation in Amphibian Prey Capture.

Bart G Borghuis1, Anthony Leonardo2.   

Abstract

Sensorimotor delays decouple behaviors from the events that drive them. The brain compensates for these delays with predictive mechanisms, but the efficacy and timescale over which these mechanisms operate remain poorly understood. Here, we assess how prediction is used to compensate for prey movement that occurs during visuomotor processing. We obtained high-speed video records of freely moving, tongue-projecting salamanders catching walking prey, emulating natural foraging conditions. We found that tongue projections were preceded by a rapid head turn lasting ∼ 130 ms. This motor lag, combined with the ∼ 100 ms phototransduction delay at photopic light levels, gave a ∼ 230 ms visuomotor response delay during which prey typically moved approximately one body length. Tongue projections, however, did not significantly lag prey position but were highly accurate instead. Angular errors in tongue projection accuracy were consistent with a linear extrapolation model that predicted prey position at the time of tongue contact using the average prey motion during a ∼ 175 ms period one visual latency before the head movement. The model explained successful strikes where the tongue hit the fly, and unsuccessful strikes where the fly turned and the tongue hit a phantom location consistent with the fly's earlier trajectory. The model parameters, obtained from the data, agree with the temporal integration and latency of retinal responses proposed to contribute to motion extrapolation. These results show that the salamander predicts future prey position and that prediction significantly improves prey capture success over a broad range of prey speeds and light levels. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Neural processing delays cause actions to lag behind the events that elicit them. To cope with these delays, the brain predicts what will happen in the future. While neural circuits in the retina and beyond have been suggested to participate in such predictions, few behaviors have been explored sufficiently to constrain circuit function. Here we show that salamanders aim their tongues by using extrapolation to estimate future prey position, thereby compensating for internal delays from both visual and motor processing. Predictions made just before a prey turn resulted in the tongue being projected to a position consistent with the prey's pre-turn trajectory. These results define the computations and operating regimen for neural circuits that predict target motion.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3515430-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delays; extrapolation; motion; prediction; prey capture; retina

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26586829      PMCID: PMC4649011          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3189-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  37 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Prey pursuit and interception in dragonflies.

Authors:  R M Olberg; A H Worthington; K R Venator
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  E Brenner; J B Smeets
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina.

Authors:  M J Berry; I H Brivanlou; T A Jordan; M Meister
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-03-25       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball.

Authors:  M F Land; P McLeod
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Chasing a dummy target: smooth pursuit and velocity control in male blowflies.

Authors:  Norbert Boeddeker; Roland Kern; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Romi Nijhawan
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Forward models in visuomotor control.

Authors:  Biren Mehta; Stefan Schaal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Motor control of tongue movement during prey capture in plethodontid salamanders

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  The influence of visual landscape on the free flight behavior of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Lance F Tammero; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  12 in total

1.  Integrated Control of Predatory Hunting by the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala.

Authors:  Wenfei Han; Luis A Tellez; Miguel J Rangel; Simone C Motta; Xiaobing Zhang; Isaac O Perez; Newton S Canteras; Sara J Shammah-Lagnado; Anthony N van den Pol; Ivan E de Araujo
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Rapid assessment of natural visual motion integration across primate species.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Hiu Mei Chow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Context-dependent modulation of natural approach behaviour in mice.

Authors:  Nicole M Procacci; Kelsey M Allen; Gael E Robb; Rebecca Ijekah; Hudson Lynam; Jennifer L Hoy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Learning to make external sensory stimulus predictions using internal correlations in populations of neurons.

Authors:  Audrey J Sederberg; Jason N MacLean; Stephanie E Palmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Neural circuit control of innate behaviors.

Authors:  Wei Xiao; Zhuo-Lei Jiao; Esra Senol; Jiwei Yao; Miao Zhao; Zheng-Dong Zhao; Xiaowei Chen; Peng Cao; Yu Fu; Zhihua Gao; Wei L Shen; Xiao-Hong Xu
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 6.038

6.  An Adaptive Neural Mechanism for Acoustic Motion Perception with Varying Sparsity.

Authors:  Danish Shaikh; Poramate Manoonpong
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Elements of a stochastic 3D prediction engine in larval zebrafish prey capture.

Authors:  Andrew D Bolton; Martin Haesemeyer; Josua Jordi; Ulrich Schaechtle; Feras A Saad; Vikash K Mansinghka; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Florian Engert
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  What the salamander eye has been telling the vision scientist's brain.

Authors:  Fernando Rozenblit; Tim Gollisch
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 7.727

9.  Behavioural movement strategies in cyclic models.

Authors:  B Moura; J Menezes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Flexible prediction of opponent motion with internal representation in interception behavior.

Authors:  Kazushi Tsutsui; Keisuke Fujii; Kazutoshi Kudo; Kazuya Takeda
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.