Literature DB >> 26586730

Health services should collect feedback from inpatients at the point of service: opinions from patients and staff in acute and subacute facilities.

Stephen D Gill1, Jane Redden-Hoare2, Trisha L Dunning3, Andrew J Hughes4, Pamela J Dolley5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Point of service feedback (POSF) enables patients to give health services feedback about their experiences during or immediately after care. Despite the increasing use of POSF, little is known regarding patients' and staffs' opinions of this practice and whether they consider it acceptable or useful. The study aimed to determine patient and staff opinions regarding POSF.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Acute and subacute healthcare facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and forty-seven patients and 221 staff.
RESULTS: Participants indicated that patients should be invited to evaluate health services when they are in hospital or subacute care and improving services was the most important reason for doing so. Staff indicated that: collecting patients' feedback during their stay was an important part of providing care and not an interruption to it (n = 187 of 221, 85%); collecting patients' feedback was best done with a variety of methods; talking directly with patients during their stay was the preferred option (n = 161 of 219, 74%). More patients preferred to: give feedback during their stay (51%) than after discharge from care (15%); give feedback by talking with someone (45%) than completing a questionnaire (31%). Some patients (14%) were concerned about reprisals from staff if they gave negative feedback.
CONCLUSIONS: POSF can be acceptable and useful for evaluating health services and should be incorporated into a person-centred approach that allows patients to choose from a variety of feedback options both during and after their stay. To be most useful, feedback should be incorporated into a quality improvement system.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  healthcare evaluation mechanisms; patient experience; patient participation; patient satisfaction; point of service

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26586730     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  5 in total

Review 1.  Building patient capacity to participate in care during hospitalisation: a scoping review.

Authors:  Donna Goodridge; Meghan McDonald; Lucia New; Murray Scharf; Elizabeth Harrison; Thomas Rotter; Erin Watson; Chrysanthus Henry; Erika D Penz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ).

Authors:  Jeanette Melin; Robin Fornazar; Martin Spångfors; Leslie Pendrill
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 3.  Health system responsiveness: a systematic evidence mapping review of the global literature.

Authors:  Gadija Khan; Nancy Kagwanja; Eleanor Whyle; Lucy Gilson; Sassy Molyneux; Nikki Schaay; Benjamin Tsofa; Edwine Barasa; Jill Olivier
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2021-05-01

4.  Comparison of objective measures and patients' perceptions of quality of services in government health facilities in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Authors:  Janna M Wisniewski; Mark L Diana; Valerie A Yeager; David R Hotchkiss
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Using patient feedback to drive quality improvement in hospitals: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Simone Berger; Ana Maria Saut; Fernando Tobal Berssaneti
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.